The Royal Wedding

Page 5 of 9 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by lardbucket on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 09:28

is that a 'read my lips' moment? L-A-W?

lardbucket


Number of posts : 31972
Reputation : 155
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by skully on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 09:40

JGK wrote:
skully wrote:
JGK wrote:
skully wrote:Pinkos still sooking. Cool


{snigger @ Tories who are more than happy to bring up "the recession we had to have" at the drop of a hat}
You are farkin kidding, aren't you? All you pinkos ever do is whinge about LJH, when you never had it so good while he was in power. Dear God in Heaven, what a bunch of pink coloured glasses wearing frauds you all are. Mad

Have a look back at your own whinging in the last 2 pages. Bwahahahahahahaha. Pinkos need an irony transplant because they clearly don't know the meaning. Laughing


Tell you what then - I won't mention or implictly refer to Howard's abysmal performance as Treasurer ever again and you don't get to mention etc "the recession we had to have".

First one to fail does a naked cyber run through the forum.
Deal if we can include horrie in the bet.












































You'll have no farkin chance. Cool
avatar
skully


Number of posts : 91202
Age : 106
Reputation : 199
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by JGK on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:15

You'll have no farkin chance.

Agreed. Doubly so if we include qmy...

JGK


Number of posts : 37395
Reputation : 122
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by skully on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:29

Meh, I can tolerate qmy's Banjoesque no-teethed roob ramblings (mainly because he bursts into tears at the first anti-pinko jibe, which highly amuses me Cool) and Mick's nightly sooks, but horrie's ad nauseum repetitive diarrhoea just clogs up the place with his smelly and decaying brain dandruff.
avatar
skully


Number of posts : 91202
Age : 106
Reputation : 199
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Allan D on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:49

Nice putdown by Krudd as he deals with one of the most obnoxious interviewers on the most obnoxious programme on the most obnoxious station in GB as the latter pushes the agenda of keeping Gaddafi and getting rid of the Royals (sound needed):

"William's a good bloke"
avatar
Allan D


Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by lardbucket on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:59

can't see anything special about that interviewer ... seems a fairly average Pom

lardbucket


Number of posts : 31972
Reputation : 155
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Allan D on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 11:27

That's because you don't listen to him every morning - he's an aggravating little s---t who used to be the Baghdad Broadcasting Company's Seppo correspondent and was then recalled to partner John Humphries on R4's "Socialism Today" morning programme which is bit like listening to Radio Moscow in the Brezhnev era although slightly less entertaining.

However I suppose you consider all Poms to be aggravating s--ts so on that basis I suppose Webb does rate as "fairly average" in your view nevertheless I thought Krudd was masterfully dismissive despite being constantly interrupted by Webb's insistence on putting words in his mouth and wanting to interpret his views on both the Middle East and the monarchy.
avatar
Allan D


Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Brass Monkey on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 12:35

Basil wrote:
I am going to get slaughtered as it's my birthday.

How insensitive of those Royal tossers, didn't they know it clashed? I hope they visited you and apologised?
avatar
Brass Monkey


Number of posts : 44858
Age : 108
Reputation : 413
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : afg

View user profile http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjWhbVWj9wQ

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Paul Keating on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 13:13

hey skully

can we broker a deal? You stop referring to pink batts/BER and i stop bringing up middle class welfare and taking the knife to health during the howard years.
avatar
Paul Keating



Number of posts : 4646
Reputation : 8
Registration date : 2007-10-25
Flag/Background : wi

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by eowyn on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 17:25

Allan D wrote:That's because you don't listen to him every morning - he's an aggravating little s---t who used to be the Baghdad Broadcasting Company's Seppo correspondent and was then recalled to partner John Humphries on R4's "Socialism Today" morning programme which is bit like listening to Radio Moscow in the Brezhnev era although slightly less entertaining.

However I suppose you consider all Poms to be aggravating s--ts so on that basis I suppose Webb does rate as "fairly average" in your view nevertheless I thought Krudd was masterfully dismissive despite being constantly interrupted by Webb's insistence on putting words in his mouth and wanting to interpret his views on both the Middle East and the monarchy.

Your hatred of the BBC is truly amazing. BBC Radio 4 the home of socialism, do the ladies who listen to Women's Hour know that? You'll be calling the jam and cake making members of the WI followers of Mao Zadong next. You are the most amusing person on here. Don't stop giving, Allan.
avatar
eowyn


Number of posts : 11115
Age : 117
Reputation : 65
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : yrk

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Gary 111 on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 17:45

Al's parents didn't go without bananas for six years so that the Women's Hour could indoctrinate us with their socialist propaganda. He's been to the studios and knows they're all really red under the bed, sandal-wearing, Castro worshipping types.
avatar
Gary 111


Number of posts : 5717
Reputation : 29
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile http://www.flamingbails.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by skully on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 18:21

Paul Keating wrote:hey skully

can we broker a deal? You stop referring to pink batts/BER and i stop bringing up middle class welfare and taking the knife to health during the howard years.
Ponts, me ol' cobber, I'm happy not to talk about politics at all, but it is truly the one thing that is guaranteed to fire us all up. With horrie in the mix, we'll never have a situation where politics is not brought up on a daily basis.

Back in the old days of ABC as a very green forummer, I used to get uncomfortable when we had interstate sledging going on, and made several suggestions that we "all just get along". That was an abysmal failure, so I just joined in the fun. Politics is no different.
avatar
skully


Number of posts : 91202
Age : 106
Reputation : 199
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by taipan on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 19:37

skully wrote:but it is truly the one thing that is guaranteed to fire us all up.

Not really.

Some of us don't give a flying fark about Aussie politics.

But then again, that could be just me.
avatar
taipan


Number of posts : 46173
Age : 116
Reputation : 116
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : saf

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Winkle Spinner on Thu 28 Apr 2011, 20:17

avatar
Winkle Spinner


Number of posts : 953
Age : 27
Reputation : 6
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by skully on Fri 29 Apr 2011, 00:49

taipan wrote:
skully wrote:but it is truly the one thing that is guaranteed to fire us all up.

Not really.

Some of us don't give a flying fark about Aussie politics.

But then again, that could be just me.
"Us" being Aussies, thanks taips. tongue-out
avatar
skully


Number of posts : 91202
Age : 106
Reputation : 199
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by lardbucket on Fri 29 Apr 2011, 01:37

Gary 111 wrote:Al's parents didn't go without bananas for six years so that the Women's Hour could indoctrinate us with their socialist propaganda. He's been to the studios and knows they're all really red under the bed, sandal-wearing, Castro worshipping types.

Don't mention the shipping report. Unadulterated Trotskyite sedition.

lardbucket


Number of posts : 31972
Reputation : 155
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by horace on Fri 29 Apr 2011, 02:54

Paul Keating wrote:hey skully

can we broker a deal? You stop referring to pink batts/BER and i stop bringing up middle class welfare and taking the knife to health during the howard years.

hmmn...I see I was mentioned in earlier despatches...I have no truck with either the ALP or the Libs (let alone abhorrent Greens)...I tend to be critical of both...but in the interests of peace tho I expect it is temporary I won't comment on ljh, bronnie, NSW ALP, costello, the mad monk, juliar for awhile
avatar
horace


Number of posts : 34497
Age : 108
Reputation : 66
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : ire

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by skully on Fri 29 Apr 2011, 03:56

Well, JGK and Ponts, it seems we have a deal. But I bet h is first to do a nudie cyber run. Mad

This is, of course, barring any outrages trolls from the likes of qmy, Mick, RD, BD etc from either sides of politics. Cool
avatar
skully


Number of posts : 91202
Age : 106
Reputation : 199
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Mick Sawyer on Fri 29 Apr 2011, 04:09

Hass wrote:
Mick Sawyer wrote:
lardbucket wrote:yes, that was a decision validated in spades soon after by the entire voting population


You don't see a problem with a foreigner dismissing our government? You can't see a time when that foreigner might have a conflict of interest?

That is utter bulltwang Mick.

A foreigner did not dismiss the Australian government. The Queen has no power to dismiss an Australian government. The Governor-General is the only person who can do that.

The Statute of Westminster ensures that the Governor-General is appointed and dismissed on the advice of the Australian Prime Minister. The Queen has the right to advise, warn and counsel on this decision, but she must ultimately accept the Prime Minister's advice.

My statement was delivered with my tongue planted firmly in my cheek & in that same spirit the following comes from our constitution;

"2.


A Governor-General appointed by the Queen shall be Her Majesty's representative in the Commonwealth, and shall have and may exercise in the Commonwealth during the Queen's pleasure, but subject to this Constitution, such powers and functions of the Queen as Her Majesty may be pleased to assign to him.................


61.


The executive power of the Commonwealth is vested in the Queen and is exercisable by the Governor-General as the Queen's representative, and extends to the execution and maintenance of this Constitution, and of the laws of the Commonwealth."


The Queen's representative - acting for and on behalf of the Queen of Australia, acting for and on behalf of a foreigner.

As a by the way, Clyde Cameron was of the belief that the US administration blugeoned Kerr after Cairns, Cameron (& maybe others) slated Nixon over the bombing of Hanoi & civilian deaths. Cameron also believed the septics to perceive a strong risk of nationalisation of the Australian subsidiaries of US companies.
avatar
Mick Sawyer


Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by G.Wood on Fri 29 Apr 2011, 04:18

skully wrote:Well, JGK and Ponts, it seems we have a deal. But I bet h is first to do a nudie cyber run. Mad

This is, of course, barring any outrages trolls from the likes of qmy, Mick, RD, BD etc from either sides of politics. Cool

outrageous
avatar
G.Wood


Number of posts : 12070
Reputation : 99
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : none

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by skully on Fri 29 Apr 2011, 05:01

trolls that cause outrages - outrages trolls. tongue-out
avatar
skully


Number of posts : 91202
Age : 106
Reputation : 199
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by G.Wood on Fri 29 Apr 2011, 05:10

I was merely suggesting that it was outrageous that you accused myself and ??? of being trolls. Mick and BD sure, but us 2!!! Ridiculous
avatar
G.Wood


Number of posts : 12070
Reputation : 99
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : none

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by horace on Fri 29 Apr 2011, 05:21

absurd Twisted Evil
avatar
horace


Number of posts : 34497
Age : 108
Reputation : 66
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : ire

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by skully on Fri 29 Apr 2011, 05:35

Outragus.
avatar
skully


Number of posts : 91202
Age : 106
Reputation : 199
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by taipan on Fri 29 Apr 2011, 07:40

skully wrote:Well, JGK and Ponts, it seems we have a deal. But I bet h is first to do a nudie cyber run. Mad

This is, of course, barring any outrages trolls from the likes of qmy, Mick, RD, BD etc from either sides of politics. Cool

Is ths the end of the forum as we know it?
avatar
taipan


Number of posts : 46173
Age : 116
Reputation : 116
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : saf

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 5 of 9 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum