The Royal Wedding

Page 6 of 9 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by horace on Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:51 pm

nah we are moving our usual erudite debates about politics to saffieville - ie your joint and Perth
avatar
horace


Number of posts : 34391
Age : 107
Reputation : 66
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : ire

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Big Dog on Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:03 pm

Well, this Troll would like to get back to the topic in hand & wish the Duke & Duchess of Cambridge all the best on their big day.
avatar
Big Dog


Number of posts : 13692
Age : 27
Reputation : 76
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background : tig

View user profile http://bigdog.bigblog.com.au/index.do

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Chivalry Augustus on Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:20 pm

The only thing that would make this wedding worthwhile is if the bride didn't turn up. Real car crash entertainment that would be.
avatar
Chivalry Augustus



Number of posts : 4849
Age : 29
Reputation : 6
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Zat on Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:21 pm

I'll second that BD. Especially as I'll be watching Carlton get their annual flogging at the hands of the Swannies while the countdown for the next eagerly anticipated royal divorce begins.

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 83
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Mick Sawyer on Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:02 pm

Big Dog wrote:Well, this Troll would like to get back to the topic in hand & wish the Duke & Duchess of Cambridge all the best on their big day.

That telegram from Betty must have been a very special moment in a very long life.
avatar
Mick Sawyer


Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Allan D on Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:45 pm

Went off rather well, I thought. No Gary Godsmith, though. Border Agency must have ben told to keep an eye out for him and stop him entering the country at all costs.
avatar
Allan D


Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-09-01
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by eowyn on Sat Apr 30, 2011 3:04 am

I enjoyed today. Pomp, ceremony and a bit of humour with the Aston Martin. I hope it works, like I'd hope it for anyone getting married.
avatar
eowyn


Number of posts : 11115
Age : 117
Reputation : 65
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background : yrk

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by JKLever on Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:15 am

Caught it on the news. Looked lovely she did and Pippa is a nice piece of arse too Wink

Im in london atm at a friends, place is full of northeners
avatar
JKLever


Number of posts : 27232
Reputation : 153
Registration date : 2007-08-07
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by LeFromage on Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:55 am

JKLever wrote:Caught it on the news. Looked lovely she did and Pippa is a nice piece of arse too Wink

Defty brought on-topic - she (Pippa) is stepping out with former unconvincing cricketer Alex Loudon.

He must've bowled her over with his doosra. Or, I don't know, something posh and foppy. Who knows how they woo each other.

Perhaps a secret handshake is involved. He can make his go the other way.
avatar
LeFromage


Number of posts : 26195
Reputation : 425
Registration date : 2007-08-04
Flag/Background : fra

View user profile http://www.flamingbails.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by JKLever on Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:22 am

Lucky farqer!

Mummy Middleton was very presentable too...
avatar
JKLever


Number of posts : 27232
Reputation : 153
Registration date : 2007-08-07
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Big Dog on Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:20 am

JKLever wrote:Lucky farqer!

Mummy Middleton was very presentable too...

I thought so too. She looked like she could have been Kate's sister.
avatar
Big Dog


Number of posts : 13692
Age : 27
Reputation : 76
Registration date : 2007-09-05
Flag/Background : tig

View user profile http://bigdog.bigblog.com.au/index.do

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by LeFromage on Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:23 am

With these inbred toffs, it's a possibility that she was.
avatar
LeFromage


Number of posts : 26195
Reputation : 425
Registration date : 2007-08-04
Flag/Background : fra

View user profile http://www.flamingbails.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by skully on Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:57 am

And then some rampant British sex was had:

avatar
skully


Number of posts : 91035
Age : 105
Reputation : 199
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Allan D on Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:31 am

Mummy Middleton isn't a toff but a former BA trolley dolly but Berkshire air must be good for breeding nonetheless:



Wonder if Prince Harry will give Chelsy Davey the bum's rush and pull rank on Loudon (who is a fellow Etonian, I believe) and have a crack at the sister-in-law?
avatar
Allan D


Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-09-01
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by skully on Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:24 pm

Yoiks, very doable MILF material!! Shocked
avatar
skully


Number of posts : 91035
Age : 105
Reputation : 199
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by JGK on Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:33 pm

That's the sister, not the mum.

JGK


Number of posts : 37333
Reputation : 122
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by skully on Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:27 pm

Ah. Even more doable. Cool

And I don't know whether to be impressed, or disgusted with your royal knowledge. Very Happy
avatar
skully


Number of posts : 91035
Age : 105
Reputation : 199
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Red on Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:06 pm

Dello wrote:
JKLever wrote:Caught it on the news. Looked lovely she did and Pippa is a nice piece of arse too Wink

Defty brought on-topic - she (Pippa) is stepping out with former unconvincing cricketer Alex Loudon.

He must've bowled her over with his doosra. Or, I don't know, something posh and foppy. Who knows how they woo each other.

Perhaps a secret handshake is involved. He can make his go the other way.

To win Pippa, you reportedly have to have a title, house in Kensington and an estate in the sticks. That's social climbing for a girl with modest looks.

Michael Vaughan on twitter encouraged Harry to make a move on the girl with the slitty eyes though.

Former England cricket captain Michael Vaughan jokingly took to Twitter to urge: "Make a move this afternoon, Harry."


At least Kate, who is no classical beauty but an improvement on other females in the royal family might improve the gene pool. With ugly ducklings like Anne, and Andrews daughters, that would be a relief to royal watchers.

William's baldness at such a young age is a worry. He used to be a bit of a hunk.

Harry of course is downright ugly, even if he has a cheeky personality.
avatar
Red


Number of posts : 14899
Reputation : 13
Registration date : 2007-10-28
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Allan D on Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:43 pm

Harry has James Hewitt's jeans which he carelessly left behind after one of his riding lessons with Diana.

(I think that's the right spelling - Wink )
avatar
Allan D


Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-09-01
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by taipan on Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:18 pm

Red wrote:
Dello wrote:
JKLever wrote:Caught it on the news. Looked lovely she did and Pippa is a nice piece of arse too Wink

Defty brought on-topic - she (Pippa) is stepping out with former unconvincing cricketer Alex Loudon.

He must've bowled her over with his doosra. Or, I don't know, something posh and foppy. Who knows how they woo each other.

Perhaps a secret handshake is involved. He can make his go the other way.

To win Pippa, you reportedly have to have a title, house in Kensington and an estate in the sticks. That's social climbing for a girl with modest looks.

Michael Vaughan on twitter encouraged Harry to make a move on the girl with the slitty eyes though.

Former England cricket captain Michael Vaughan jokingly took to Twitter to urge: "Make a move this afternoon, Harry."


At least Kate, who is no classical beauty but an improvement on other females in the royal family might improve the gene pool. With ugly ducklings like Anne, and Andrews daughters, that would be a relief to royal watchers.

William's baldness at such a young age is a worry. He used to be a bit of a hunk.

Harry of course is downright ugly, even if he has a cheeky personality.

Jealousy is a terrible emotion.
avatar
taipan


Number of posts : 46096
Age : 116
Reputation : 116
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : saf

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Henry on Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:22 pm

I find Kate Middleton quite attractive in a 'posh English lass' kind of way. Not much in the way of breasts but her nipple outline was on full display yesterday.

Princess Beatrice is hideous. Like a deformed horse. Kamran Akmal's love child. And i'm sure she's a real slut. Just yuck.
avatar
Henry


Number of posts : 32668
Reputation : 99
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Allan D on Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:48 pm

For those who prefer something more substantial than the Middleton sisters there's always Wills & Harry's first cousin, Kitty Spencer (not the one involved in the brawl in the Cape Town Macdonald's - that's her younger sister, Amelia):


avatar
Allan D


Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-09-01
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by skully on Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:16 pm

Henry wrote:I find Kate Middleton quite attractive in a 'posh English lass' kind of way. Not much in the way of breasts but her nipple outline was on full display yesterday.

Princess Beatrice is hideous. Like a deformed horse. Kamran Akmal's love child. And i'm sure she's a real slut. Just yuck.
Hehehe. Trev, now free to judge openly, telling it like it is. Cool

Gotta say though, that there is some tidy genes running through the Middleton chickybabes.

For Trev:

demotivational posters - PROGRAMMING
see more Very Demotivational
avatar
skully


Number of posts : 91035
Age : 105
Reputation : 199
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by skully on Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:29 pm

Another "set" for Trev, cos I'm feeling generous. Cool....

avatar
skully


Number of posts : 91035
Age : 105
Reputation : 199
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Allan D on Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:31 pm

Try using the image downloader rather than pasting the url straight on the page. Just a jumble of letters and numbers this end.
avatar
Allan D


Number of posts : 6635
Reputation : 16
Registration date : 2007-09-01
Flag/Background : eng

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Royal Wedding

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 6 of 9 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum