Re: New Zealand v India, 2nd test, Napier, March 26-30

by HH_pink Thu 26 Mar 2009, 23:05

All your c*ntish accents are annoying. All are equally whiny. But I like them. Yes, I like being annoyed. Thank you.

by HH_pink Thu 26 Mar 2009, 23:06

Bl00dy road! Kiwi groundsmen gone mad.

by Ross Thu 26 Mar 2009, 23:08

Cricinfo headline: "Ryder and Franklin in century stand"

Current partnership: 99 runs

Rolling Eyes

by HH_pink Thu 26 Mar 2009, 23:09

The headline in the US just says, "Ryder and Franklin slowly gnaw away".

by Guest Thu 26 Mar 2009, 23:39

Franklin was wrong to hisitate there.

by HH_pink Fri 27 Mar 2009, 01:13

The Wairararararapa boy gets his 200! F*ck me.

And now he gets out.

by horace Fri 27 Mar 2009, 01:33

HH_pink wrote:Bl00dy road! Kiwi groundsmen gone mad.

....not so ..just inept the Indian attack

by DJ_Smerk Fri 27 Mar 2009, 01:35

Ban New Zealand and India?

by horace Fri 27 Mar 2009, 01:38

nah...I want the snoozies to have a good win here...to prove yet again how woeful banindia is when not playing on their doctored wickets

by OP Tipping Fri 27 Mar 2009, 01:48

This is NZ's second highest total against India, only behind that monster at Mohali some years back.

I dare say the draw is the most likely outcome.

by Bradman Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:17

Bat the qunts into the ground and when they pop their heads up leave the heads there as they may provide good movement off the pitch.

by tac Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:18

bat all day and keep going tomorrow . . . make 750+

by Bradman Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:19

Fark! Agreement if only by accident.

by tac Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:20

even a stopped clock is right twice a day, bradders . . . you were bound to talk sense at some point . . .

by Henry Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:26

New Zealand could still lose this. If Sehwag gets going India could overhaul NZ's total by lunch on day 4, and despite NZ's huge score in this first innings, their batting remains fragile imo so anything could happen.

by Henry Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:28

And as for Taylor and Ryder- Well f*ck me if NZ haven't found 2 world class batsmen. scratch

by Bradman Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:35

I normally only post twice a day (on a good day) so that's a pretty good average.

What's your excuse for the other 23 hrs and 58 minutes worth of crap you post?

by HH_pink Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:38

You take a minute to make a post, on average? Gazork.

by horace Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:38

teehee...qm3 v tacster is one of the more ntertaining jousts on the forum...keep it up guys Very Happy

by HH_pink Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:41

chumble spuzz horrie

by tac Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:42

Bradman wrote:I normally only post twice a day (on a good day) so that's a pretty good average.

What's your excuse for the other 23 hrs and 58 minutes worth of crap you post?

Good to see you have an excuse for the crap you post. As for me . . . there's nowt to excuse . . .

by Bradman Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:42

Well it seems the only thing tac and I can agree on is the declaration was hasty.

If you're batting on a road bat as long as you can and hope it juices up.

by tac Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:44

Declaration? The silly shaggers haven't declared, have they?

by Bradman Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:47

Farking looked that way to be when I turned around. Going off after the century.

by horace Fri 27 Mar 2009, 02:47

lol..<>

by Sponsored content