Flaming Bails
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

World Series Cricket II?

+9
horace
brockley
Henry
Blackadder
beamer
tricycle
PeterCS
Brass Monkey
JGK
13 posters

Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty World Series Cricket II?

Post by JGK Thu 30 Apr 2015, 15:12

Michael Clarke and David Warner $50 million targets of new rebel cricket league

April 30, 2015 - 11:00PM
Chris Barrett
Sports Writer

Michael Clarke and David Warner would be offered $50 million contracts as part of a plan hatched by an Indian conglomerate to take on the cricket establishment in a plot that has been likened to Kerry Packer's creation of World Series Cricket nearly 40 years ago.

The Essel Group's owner, Indian billionaire Subhash Chandra, has confirmed ambitions to launch a cricket venture since Fairfax Media revealed last week the business giant had registered company names in Australia and other nations in an apparent bid to launch a rival world governing body and a rich, new global Twenty20 league.

They would need to flex their financial muscle in an extraordinary way to coax the world's leading and best-paid players away from their national boards but it has since emerged their plans included targeting Australian captain Clarke and opener Warner, among other stars. Sources say the plan devised was to lure Clarke and Warner into the rebel structure as priority acquisitions with 10-year contracts worth a staggering $50 million.

Essel's potential raid on cricketers has left the International Cricket Council and aligned bodies such as Cricket Australia on high alert about a pending split in the game, and Fairfax Media can reveal the Indian company is not the only entity which has entertained a challenge to the game's structure.

Former world players' union chief Tim May said on Thursday he had been sounded out by several other organisations about the feasibility of them entering the cricket market in a similar fashion, and pointed to disillusion with the recently restructured ICC financial model that heavily favoured India, Australia and England as a factor.

"There is a general dissatisfaction with the game's governance, how it's run and the inequity of the game's finances and there are other bodies around that would believe they can globalise the game of cricket in a more equitable fashion than the current administration," May said.

Cricket Australia's board will assemble in Melbourne on Friday. The meeting was scheduled before news of Essel's potential power play emerged but directors are expected to be briefed on an ICC investigation into the Essel project and discuss the matter at length.

What exactly Essel has in mind has not been confirmed by Chandra but sources say a global, franchise-based T20 tournament, encompassing established cricket countries as well as new territories such as the United States and China, has been the centrepiece of their plans. The London Telegraph reported this week that a website domain, globalt20.com, was registered by Essel in April and among 249 domains registered around countries that could be tied to a new governing body. One source said Essel, which owns the broadcaster Zee TV and its subsidiary Ten Sports, also planned to maintain longer-form cricket between major countries if the project got off the ground, as well as a Rest of the World team made up of players from other nations. Several billion dollars are said to have been made available to pull it off.

It's yet to be seen how tempting potential offers for the likes of Clarke and Warner would be. Clarke earned $4 million, including endorsements last year according to the Business Review Weekly Top 50 Sports Earners list and while at the age of 34 and on the finishing stretch in his international career a 10-year contract would appear nonsensical his signing would be a coup in itself. Warner, 28, pocketed $3.8 million last year, according to BRW.

Essel's track record in cricket is poor, having still failed to pay out $2m in wages to players including Australians from the shortlived Indian Cricket League it ran from 2007 to 2009. The ICL was also the subject of corruption admissions made by former New Zealand batsman Lou Vincent.

Whether CA will have to look at fortifying its player base in the face of potential approaches is a subject that may need addressing. Australia generally contracts its leading players on an annual basis - there are 19 including Clarke and Warner on the 2015/2016 list. However, as of Thursday they had not been sent their contracts and while they remain unsigned they are technically free agents when their existing contracts expire on June 30.

The founder of the Indian Premier League, Lalit Modi, and his associate Dean Kino, the ex-CA lawyer and formerly a key player in establishing the T20 Champions League, have been strongly linked to the Essel project. Modi admits he was approached about it but denies involvement, as does Kino.

US-based May, the former Australian spinner, is not surprised at the emergence of potential rivals to the ICC on the scene. "If the current administration really wants to protect the game they should look within to see how they can improve their own administration rather than blaming others who merely want to be competitive," he said.

"Any organisation that doesn't meet the highest standards, whether it's in corporate world or sporting world, if there are doubts about the integrity of thier leaders, if they're doubts about how they distribute finances, they're always going to be up for some sort of battle against someone who wants to do the right thing and that is probably what's happening in cricket at the moment."

Who is Subhash Chandra?
Subhash Chandra, 64, is a billionaire media mogul who owns the Essel Group, which controls the TV network Zee Entertainment. The network reaches 730 million viewers in 169 countries.

Chandra is best known for setting up the Indian Cricket League in 2007, mainly because he was annoyed that Zee Entertainment was unable to secure the lucrative television rights to international and domestic cricket in India.

The league gained rebel status because it was not recognised by the International Cricket Council. It targeted older players, including Australians Jason Gillespie, Michael Kasprowicz and Damien Martyn, but instead of being a viable alternative to the Indian Premier League, the ICL crashed into a defunct tournament poisoned by match-fixing and reports of players being underpaid. Chandra is based in Mumbai and, according to Forbes, has a net worth of $3.9 billion, which puts him at number 21 on India's rich list. Among other investments he also owns a newspaper chain and theme parks.

Tom Decent

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by Brass Monkey Thu 30 Apr 2015, 15:27

"Sources say the plan devised was to lure Clarke and Warner into the rebel structure as priority acquisitions with 10-year contracts worth a staggering $50 million. "

Michael Clarke would hardly last a season. 10 years? Shit, they may as well sign me up...
Brass Monkey
Brass Monkey


Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : afg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjWhbVWj9wQ

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by PeterCS Thu 30 Apr 2015, 15:28

YOU CAN NOT BE SERIES.

The Indian League of Leagues - dedicated to digging in, blocking it and proper cricket?
PeterCS
PeterCS


Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background : ire

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by tricycle Thu 30 Apr 2015, 15:38

So Subhash Chandra's still pissed at being f*cked over by the BCCI for the television rights.

tricycle


Number of posts : 13349
Age : 24
Reputation : 54
Registration date : 2011-12-17
Flag/Background : none

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by beamer Thu 30 Apr 2015, 17:52

Yeah, more ICL 2 than WSC 2 I suspect.

beamer


Number of posts : 15399
Reputation : 74
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by Blackadder Thu 30 Apr 2015, 23:47

No way that sort of money can be sustained long term.

Blackadder

World Series Cricket II? ZY4L4DZ

Number of posts : 3959
Age : 49
Reputation : 12
Registration date : 2008-12-27
Flag/Background : nsw

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by Henry Fri 01 May 2015, 00:59

"Essel's track record in cricket is poor, having still failed to pay out $2m in wages to players including Australians from the shortlived Indian Cricket League it ran from 2007 to 2009. The ICL was also the subject of corruption admissions made by former New Zealand batsman Lou Vincent."

Who would trust them after that? And if they are able to pay $50 million contracts, why not just resolve the ICL player wages (comparatively loose change) immediately to restore credibility?
Henry
Henry


Number of posts : 32891
Reputation : 100
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by brockley Fri 01 May 2015, 02:08

With a 10 team World Cup and t20 World cup 10 teams thats the associates gone.
looking at the boards windies owe 42 million,Zimbabwe in debt,south africa quotas 6 non white players,srilanka interim board icc witholding their funds of 10 mill,pakistan no one will play them at home.
The big 3 have a big pay rise so the other boards take a cut and so do the associates.
I think its ripe for a takeover.

brockley


Number of posts : 1158
Reputation : 1
Registration date : 2007-09-09
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by horace Fri 01 May 2015, 04:12

Banindia
horace
horace


Number of posts : 42573
Age : 114
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : ire

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by skully Fri 01 May 2015, 08:19

Henry wrote:"Essel's track record in cricket is poor, having still failed to pay out $2m in wages to players including Australians from the shortlived Indian Cricket League it ran from 2007 to 2009. The ICL was also the subject of corruption admissions made by former New Zealand batsman Lou Vincent."

Who would trust them after that? And if they are able to pay $50 million contracts, why not just resolve the ICL player wages (comparatively loose change) immediately to restore credibility?

Aye. Gilly was on the Nooz saying steer clear of this clown.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105969
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by taipan Fri 01 May 2015, 08:48

brockley wrote:With a 10 team World Cup and t20 World cup 10 teams thats the associates gone.
looking at the boards windies owe 42 million,Zimbabwe in debt,south africa quotas 6 non white players,srilanka interim board icc witholding their funds of 10 mill,pakistan no one will play them at home.
The big 3 have a big pay rise so the other boards take a cut and so do the associates.
I think its ripe for a takeover.

Zim are touring Pak later this month.
taipan
taipan


Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : saf

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by Nath Fri 01 May 2015, 10:29

the new Stanford
Nath
Nath


Number of posts : 11974
Age : 44
Reputation : 52
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by Ethics? The Gall! Sun 03 May 2015, 00:01

to me that translates as "money money money..."
Ethics? The Gall!
Ethics? The Gall!


Number of posts : 1911
Reputation : 10
Registration date : 2012-08-23
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by tricycle Tue 23 Jun 2015, 09:24

taipan wrote:
brockley wrote:With a 10 team World Cup and t20 World cup 10 teams thats the associates gone.
looking at the boards windies owe 42 million,Zimbabwe in debt,south africa quotas 6 non white players,srilanka interim board icc witholding their funds of 10 mill,pakistan no one will play them at home.
The big 3 have a big pay rise so the other boards take a cut and so do the associates.
I think its ripe for a takeover.

Zim are touring Pak later this month.
In a weird way, Zimbabwe are caught in the eye of this storm. India's tour to Zimbabwe may be postponed to next year as the essel group are the rights holders for Zimbabwean cricket. They also hold the rights for Sri Lanka, Pakistan, South Africa and West Indies.

In the end, just hope that they're not put completely out of the sport telecast business. Their golf channel is good.

tricycle


Number of posts : 13349
Age : 24
Reputation : 54
Registration date : 2011-12-17
Flag/Background : none

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by Nath Tue 23 Jun 2015, 10:48

demand cash up front.
Nath
Nath


Number of posts : 11974
Age : 44
Reputation : 52
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by brockley Wed 24 Jun 2015, 04:15

According to the Age Essel spoke to Aussie players at IPL,CA and BCCI sleeping at the wheel.

brockley


Number of posts : 1158
Reputation : 1
Registration date : 2007-09-09
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

World Series Cricket II? Empty Re: World Series Cricket II?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum