taipan and Zimmy.....Please change your avatars!

if you're using Firefox, download the AdBlock Plus add-on and add whoever's picture url to it.

That's what happens when you work for "Archie and Jughead Double Digest," Vikas. Get a proper job if you want to keep forumming from work.

Just do what i do: block every single image on this forum. Simple.

Henry Nolonga wrote:Just do what i do: block every single image on this forum. Simple.

Can you see your own avatar?

Nath wrote:if you're using Firefox, download the AdBlock Plus add-on and add whoever's picture url to it.

Thats within admin rights and I will need to put in work request and specify why it needs to be done on intranet. No thanks. That would be seeking trouble.

Not sure which one to change to:

Who's the scrumpet in your current one?

bliksem wrote:Who's the scrumpet in your current one?

Google 'RAYLENE A met art'...

When forumming from work, I just resize the window and scroll right so I bypass all the avatars.

Although I still haven't found a way around Zim's signature.

Vikas ain't that sharp.

skully wrote:Vikas ain't that sharp.

Guess I am not the only one or the suggestion would have come a lot before. Resized windows is frustrating having to scroll all over to track the topic and page area and all, everytime you open a page. It is a plain pain. But I guess it is a better option than ignoring people.

Also it still doesn't help with signatures like Zimmy's. So he stays on Ignore.

So he stays on Ignore.

If I was on ignore before, WTF is the purpose of this thread

Invader Zim wrote:

So he stays on Ignore.

If I was on ignore before, WTF is the purpose of this thread

Dunno about you but my posts are fun.

taipan wrote:

Invader Zim wrote:

So he stays on Ignore.

If I was on ignore before, WTF is the purpose of this thread

Dunno about you but my posts are fun.

In response to Zimmy quote, You were put on Ignore only today left with no option because of your avatars and signatures. No other option of blocking the offensive pictures from public view at office.....


And taips, only a couple of your posts can be sometimes fun. The rest of them border between mildly bearable, bearable, mildly irritating and very irritating.

Paul Keating wrote:When forumming from work, I just resize the window and scroll right so I bypass all the avatars.

Although I still haven't found a way around Zim's signature.

Yep, that's all I do too. It's a bit strange really - surely your work would be a bit miffed that you're forumming and you're worried about naked birds?

If the women colleagues are so thick that they can't recognise an outlay of a forum and hence avatars they deserve all the 'shocking' they get.

FWIW, I like taips' avatar more than Zim's.

Brass Monkey wrote:

Paul Keating wrote:When forumming from work, I just resize the window and scroll right so I bypass all the avatars.

Although I still haven't found a way around Zim's signature.

Yep, that's all I do too. It's a bit strange really - surely your work would be a bit miffed that you're forumming and you're worried about naked birds?

If the women colleagues are so thick that they can't recognise an outlay of a forum and hence avatars they deserve all the 'shocking' they get.

Dude, it's got to with office regulations dealing with surfing offensive sites and offensive pictures and this includes nudity. I can't help it. Someone can just report it as pornography and it would be an issue explaining it to the bosses......

Batman wrote:Dude, it's got to with office regulations dealing with surfing offensive sites and offensive pictures and this includes nudity. I can't help it. Someone can just report it as pornography and it would be an issue explaining it to the bosses......

Here's how you explain it:

"Boss, soz, it's actually a cricket forum - I can show you it if you like - and two cockchuggers on there like to post semi-nude horndogs as their avatars. My hands are tied."

semi-nude horndogs

And on that theme....

The problem is they might not think his hands were tied.

spangler wrote:The problem is they might not think his hands were tied.

He'll be right in front of them. He can show them.

Boys will be boys . . .

Demelza wrote:Boys will be boys . . .

Surely the forum females are just as able to post 'horndog' pics?

I wouldn't merely go for a crotch shot (euw) but topless would be ok. Moobs ok too, presumably. Wonder what Batman's co-workers would think to that?

What I don't understand is how does someone working for McDonalds have access to the net at work?

Is this today's "hot" thread?