I just got offered a job in Japan.....

tac wrote:

taipan wrote:

tac wrote:Still changing the subject?

Nah, actually it is you changing the subject about your pm's asking me to help you with Danny.

The discussion was on the theme of lying and irony . . . I thought that point most apt . . .

Doesn't make you any less of a liar.

Going to answer my question of why you didn't email dello now? Or don't you have the balls?

He needs some cool tunes
Not just any will suffice
But they didn't have Ice Cube
So he bought Vanilla Ice
Now cruising in his Pinto,
He sees homies as he pass
But if he looks twice
They're gonna kick his lily ass

So don't debate, a player straight
you know he really doesn't get it anyway
gonna play the field, and keep it real
But for you no way, for you no way
So if you don't rate, just overcompensate
At least you'll know you can always go on Ricki Lake
The world loves wannabees, so (hey, hey)
Do that brand new thing


Now he's getting a tattoo, yeah
He's gettin' ink done
He asked for a "13" but they drew a "31"
Friends say he's trying too hard
And he's not quite hip
But in his own mind
He's the, he's the dopest trip

Give it to me baby,
Uh-huh uh-huh
Give it to me baby,
Uh-huh uh-huh
Give it to me baby
Uh-huh uh-huh

Uno, dos, tres, cuatro, cinco, cinco, seis

So don't debate, a player straight
you know he really doesn't get it anyway
gonna play the field, and keep it real
For you no way, for you no way
So if you don't rate, just overcompensate
At least you'll know you can always go on Ricki Lake
The world needs wannabes
The world loves wannabes
Let's get some more wannabes (hey, hey)
Do that brand new thing

taipan wrote:

tac wrote:

taipan wrote:

tac wrote:Still changing the subject?

Nah, actually it is you changing the subject about your pm's asking me to help you with Danny.

The discussion was on the theme of lying and irony . . . I thought that point most apt . . .

Doesn't make you any less of a liar.

Going to answer my question of why you didn't email dello now? Or don't you have the balls?

Answering you will show balls? Are you trying to goad me by questioning my "testicular fortitude"? I'd much rather talk about the courage you show in not telling your wife about your sordid little jerk-off sessions with Dem?

tac wrote:

taipan wrote:

tac wrote:

taipan wrote:

tac wrote:Still changing the subject?

Nah, actually it is you changing the subject about your pm's asking me to help you with Danny.

The discussion was on the theme of lying and irony . . . I thought that point most apt . . .

Doesn't make you any less of a liar.

Going to answer my question of why you didn't email dello now? Or don't you have the balls?

Answering you will show balls? Are you trying to goad me by questioning my "testicular fortitude"? I'd much rather talk about the courage you show in not telling your wife about your sordid little jerk-off sessions with Dem?

I'll take that as a no then.

Thought your fellow forummers might be interested in why you risked getting the forum binned to try and win a forum skirmish with Danny and Laura.

Nigel, that last post shows you have no farkin idea what you're talking about . . . again . . .

tac wrote:Nigel, that last post shows you have no farkin idea what you're talking about . . . again . . .

No jack, it just proves you are ducking and diving as usual.

I don't understand why taipan is so scared of tac. I make one innocuous remark by pm to someone and he cries and blubs about "libel" for months on end on the forum. Tac says worse stuff about him every day and he lets it slide.

Pretty strange. Come on Nigel, accuse him of libel if he's lying. Grow some balls.

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:I don't understand why taipan is so scared of tac. I make one innocuous remark by pm to someone and he cries and blubs about "libel" for months on end on the forum. Tac says worse stuff about him every day and he lets it slide.

Pretty strange. Come on Nigel, accuse him of libel if he's lying. Grow some balls.

Nigel knows that what I've said is all true . . . pretty hard to cry libel . . .

tac wrote:
Nigel knows that what I've said is all true . . . pretty hard to cry libel . . .

you've actually said anything on the past 3 pages?

All I can see is 'yo my cyber bitch was dissing your cyber-bitch' blah blah....

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:I don't understand why taipan is so scared of tac. I make one innocuous remark by pm to someone and he cries and blubs about "libel" for months on end on the forum. Tac says worse stuff about him every day and he lets it slide.

Pretty strange. Come on Nigel, accuse him of libel if he's lying. Grow some balls.

I've called him for a liar just as I did you. There is no difference between the 2 of you as you also saw a mail proving you to be a liar.

tac wrote:

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:I don't understand why taipan is so scared of tac. I make one innocuous remark by pm to someone and he cries and blubs about "libel" for months on end on the forum. Tac says worse stuff about him every day and he lets it slide.

Pretty strange. Come on Nigel, accuse him of libel if he's lying. Grow some balls.

Nigel knows that what I've said is all true . . . pretty hard to cry libel . . .

So Eowyn, here is another chance to set the record straight.

Going to do it or not?

JKLever wrote:

tac wrote:
Nigel knows that what I've said is all true . . . pretty hard to cry libel . . .

you've actually said anything on the past 3 pages?

All I can see is 'yo my cyber bitch was dissing your cyber-bitch' blah blah....

Thank god . . . I thought for a minute you had me ignore again . . .

Is it Armistice Day yet?

Bugger .... 5 months 24 days and 20 hours (central universe time) yet to go .....

Merlin wrote:Is it Armistice Day yet?

Bugger .... 5 months 24 days and 20 hours (central universe time) yet to go .....

You farkin started it . . .

Me ???
Moi???

HTF did you figure that?

taipan wrote:

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:I don't understand why taipan is so scared of tac. I make one innocuous remark by pm to someone and he cries and blubs about "libel" for months on end on the forum. Tac says worse stuff about him every day and he lets it slide.

Pretty strange. Come on Nigel, accuse him of libel if he's lying. Grow some balls.

I've called him for a liar just as I did you. There is no difference between the 2 of you as you also saw a mail proving you to be a liar.

No, you followed me around the forum crying about libel. Why don't you do that to tac? Why don't you answer each of his points about your so called affair? You just say "liar" and run off.

And I didn't get any email proving me to be a liar.

PS - Ah, I almost forgot ... the reference to the bending tailbender earlier ...
Okay ... all my fault.
Mea maxima culpa.

Merlin wrote:Me ???
Moi???

HTF did you figure that?

Umm . . . you made Nigel look like a dick so he trotted out his "NSR?/ You don't understand irony" defence to which I responded by asking whether his pathetic life of lies to his wife and family whilst claiming the moral high-ground consituted irony . . .

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:

taipan wrote:

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:I don't understand why taipan is so scared of tac. I make one innocuous remark by pm to someone and he cries and blubs about "libel" for months on end on the forum. Tac says worse stuff about him every day and he lets it slide.

Pretty strange. Come on Nigel, accuse him of libel if he's lying. Grow some balls.

I've called him for a liar just as I did you. There is no difference between the 2 of you as you also saw a mail proving you to be a liar.

No, you followed me around the forum crying about libel. Why don't you do that to tac? Why don't you answer each of his points about your so called affair? You just say "liar" and run off.

And I didn't get any email proving me to be a liar.

No sunshine, I pm'ed you to try and keep the crap off the board and you whinged and got on your high horse, "Never pm me again" were your words.

Want me to pm you the email?

tac wrote:

Merlin wrote:Me ???
Moi???

HTF did you figure that?

Umm . . . you made Nigel look like a dick so he trotted out his "NSR?/ You don't understand irony" defence to which I responded by asking whether his pathetic life of lies to his wife and family whilst claiming the moral high-ground consituted irony . . .

THAT as well.
Sh!t .. it really is my fault!!

** finds a corner to have a chuckle **

Merlin wrote:

tac wrote:

Merlin wrote:Me ???
Moi???

HTF did you figure that?

Umm . . . you made Nigel look like a dick so he trotted out his "NSR?/ You don't understand irony" defence to which I responded by asking whether his pathetic life of lies to his wife and family whilst claiming the moral high-ground consituted irony . . .

THAT as well.
Sh!t .. it really is my fault!!

** finds a corner to have a chuckle **

hey, it was worth it . . .

taipan wrote:

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:

taipan wrote:

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:I don't understand why taipan is so scared of tac. I make one innocuous remark by pm to someone and he cries and blubs about "libel" for months on end on the forum. Tac says worse stuff about him every day and he lets it slide.

Pretty strange. Come on Nigel, accuse him of libel if he's lying. Grow some balls.

I've called him for a liar just as I did you. There is no difference between the 2 of you as you also saw a mail proving you to be a liar.

No, you followed me around the forum crying about libel. Why don't you do that to tac? Why don't you answer each of his points about your so called affair? You just say "liar" and run off.

And I didn't get any email proving me to be a liar.

No sunshine, I pm'ed you to try and keep the crap off the board and you whinged and got on your high horse, "Never pm me again" were your words.

Want me to pm you the email?

No, I think you'll find you followed me around the forum first screaming libel and then once I was bored, you pmed me and I told you to go away.

If you're talking about the email I think you're talking about, I've already told you she was telling you something different to your face.

Answer the question. Why don't you argue with tac like you did with me? Go through his points and tell him why they're aren't true. Or are they true?

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:

taipan wrote:

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:

taipan wrote:

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:I don't understand why taipan is so scared of tac. I make one innocuous remark by pm to someone and he cries and blubs about "libel" for months on end on the forum. Tac says worse stuff about him every day and he lets it slide.

Pretty strange. Come on Nigel, accuse him of libel if he's lying. Grow some balls.

I've called him for a liar just as I did you. There is no difference between the 2 of you as you also saw a mail proving you to be a liar.

No, you followed me around the forum crying about libel. Why don't you do that to tac? Why don't you answer each of his points about your so called affair? You just say "liar" and run off.

And I didn't get any email proving me to be a liar.

No sunshine, I pm'ed you to try and keep the crap off the board and you whinged and got on your high horse, "Never pm me again" were your words.

Want me to pm you the email?

No, I think you'll find you followed me around the forum first screaming libel and then once I was bored, you pmed me and I told you to go away.

If you're talking about the email I think you're talking about, I've already told you she was telling you something different to your face.

Answer the question. Why don't you argue with tac like you did with me? Go through his points and tell him why they're aren't true. Or are they true?

nah, it was after I pm'ed you.

Oh. now you remember the mail. Convenient excuse isn't it. One wonders why she would lie to me, she had no reason.

Of course it's all true. Dem told me all (and more) one day when she was crying about Nigel's bullying and neglect . . . now she denies the story . . .