Flaming Bails
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

+3
taipan
skully
lardbucket
7 posters

Go down

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch Empty relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

Post by lardbucket Tue 18 Jan 2011, 08:37

It pains me to say this, as a 40 year fan of the immensity of chappelli's innate and hitherto supreme quntishness, but I fear the World Standard Quntometer may have been seriously decalibrated in recent times, or even irreparably broken.

Simmo's Nepotistically Appointed and Tenured Chief Honcho (SNATCH) has excelled himself on this occasion. Before this sustained display of illogical quntishness I thought the chappelli scale was more robust than the open-ended Richter scale, more certain than the conservation of matter ... now I move forward quite timidly in a universe where even this has been called into question.

lardbucket


Number of posts : 38123
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch Empty Re: relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

Post by skully Tue 18 Jan 2011, 08:58

Hehehe, noice. Cool
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105983
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch Empty Re: relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

Post by taipan Tue 18 Jan 2011, 10:37

I think we have to create a mini scale of Hudsonitis. This resulted in the dropping of the doughty Boucher and the handing of the gloves to AB de Villiers in order to create space for a specialist batsman. This stroke of genius has allowed the previously unknown masterblaster to take over at 7.
taipan
taipan


Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : saf

Back to top Go down

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch Empty Re: relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

Post by Mick Sawyer Tue 18 Jan 2011, 23:41

lardbucket wrote:It pains me to say this, as a 40 year fan of the immensity of chappelli's innate and hitherto supreme quntishness, but I fear the World Standard Quntometer may have been seriously decalibrated in recent times, or even irreparably broken.

Simmo's Nepotistically Appointed and Tenured Chief Honcho (SNATCH) has excelled himself on this occasion. Before this sustained display of illogical quntishness I thought the chappelli scale was more robust than the open-ended Richter scale, more certain than the conservation of matter ... now I move forward quite timidly in a universe where even this has been called into question.

snorfle!

SNATCH will stick like a .............
Mick Sawyer
Mick Sawyer


Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch Empty Re: relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

Post by Zat Wed 19 Jan 2011, 00:20

I'll email the international bureau for wiights and measures immediately to see if they can have the new standard measure of RGI calibrated in Hilditches.

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch Empty Re: relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

Post by taipan Wed 19 Jan 2011, 06:21

Might I suggest changing RGI to a Gynaecological Immensity Table?
taipan
taipan


Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : saf

Back to top Go down

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch Empty Re: relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

Post by Zat Wed 19 Jan 2011, 07:18

Well, the GIT would be what you use to determine the extent of RGI.

Zat


Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch Empty Re: relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

Post by horace Wed 19 Jan 2011, 22:34

suspect the respective noggins of bollybogan, haddit and clarke would fill any gap
horace
horace


Number of posts : 42573
Age : 114
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : ire

Back to top Go down

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch Empty Re: relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

Post by lardbucket Sun 23 Jan 2011, 00:06

turn it up, even with all 3 mentioned it'd be like dropping small pebbles into the crater of Mauna Kiloa

lardbucket


Number of posts : 38123
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch Empty Re: relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

Post by tac Sun 23 Jan 2011, 00:07

Or Trev's arse . . .
tac
tac


Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : pon

Back to top Go down

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch Empty Re: relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

Post by lardbucket Sat 29 Jan 2011, 21:10

Mick Sawyer wrote:
lardbucket wrote:It pains me to say this, as a 40 year fan of the immensity of chappelli's innate and hitherto supreme quntishness, but I fear the World Standard Quntometer may have been seriously decalibrated in recent times, or even irreparably broken.

Simmo's Nepotistically Appointed and Tenured Chief Honcho (SNATCH) has excelled himself on this occasion. Before this sustained display of illogical quntishness I thought the chappelli scale was more robust than the open-ended Richter scale, more certain than the conservation of matter ... now I move forward quite timidly in a universe where even this has been called into question.

snorfle!

SNATCH will stick like a .............

He's immense, dry, and barren. He's a fat nun with proccidentia.

lardbucket


Number of posts : 38123
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch Empty Re: relative gynaecological immensity - chappelli v Hilditch

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum