Tendulkar breaks Bradman's record!!!!

HH_pink wrote:Nuthin serious, get ******* horrie.

Fixed

well thank you taips it seems you and LLL do have a lot in common

horace wrote:well thank you taips it seems you and LLL do have a lot in common

That's just hearsay

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:HH probably wrote that article.

Phurt. It has got SG's stamp all over it.


Also I want to know why is Tac [s]trolling on rediff boards? Brings to mind an adage - Birds of a feather flock together...

Although I need not defend myself against Mr India Times, the above link was posted on another forum.

Amusing mangling of statistics.

I wonder how many international runs against England DGB would have scored if Aus played say 5 ODIs against them every 2nd year between 1929 and 1948. Excluding the war years that would make approximately 30 ODIs. Let's say DGB averaged a Husseyesque 70 odd in ODIs (not unreasonable, given the man's ability), that would be an additional, say, 2000 runs, taking DGB beyond 7000 international runs v England.

SRT has been playing against Aus since 1991. It's taken him 17 years to get this "World Record". At that rate he would need another 7 years to match the hypothetical DGB record v England.

I'm just saying.

skully wrote:Amusing mangling of statistics.

I wonder how many international runs against England DGB would have scored if Aus played say 5 ODIs against them every 2nd year between 1929 and 1948. Excluding the war years that would make approximately 30 ODIs. Let's say DGB averaged a Husseyesque 70 odd in ODIs (not unreasonable, given the man's ability), that would be an additional, say, 2000 runs, taking DGB beyond 7000 international runs v England.

SRT has been playing against Aus since 1991. It's taken him 17 years to get this "World Record". At that rate he would need another 7 years to match the hypothetical DGB record v England.

I'm just saying.

Why do you bother?

Shuttup skull.

tac wrote:

skully wrote:Amusing mangling of statistics.

I wonder how many international runs against England DGB would have scored if Aus played say 5 ODIs against them every 2nd year between 1929 and 1948. Excluding the war years that would make approximately 30 ODIs. Let's say DGB averaged a Husseyesque 70 odd in ODIs (not unreasonable, given the man's ability), that would be an additional, say, 2000 runs, taking DGB beyond 7000 international runs v England.

SRT has been playing against Aus since 1991. It's taken him 17 years to get this "World Record". At that rate he would need another 7 years to match the hypothetical DGB record v England.

I'm just saying.

Why do you bother?

Meh, nothing better to do on a slow Turdsdy night.

You can always give Trev a call . . .

Just look up your teledex for me, will ya.

skully wrote:Amusing mangling of statistics.

I wonder how many international runs against England DGB would have scored if Aus played say 5 ODIs against them every 2nd year between 1929 and 1948. Excluding the war years that would make approximately 30 ODIs. Let's say DGB averaged a Husseyesque 70 odd in ODIs (not unreasonable, given the man's ability), that would be an additional, say, 2000 runs, taking DGB beyond 7000 international runs v England.

SRT has been playing against Aus since 1991. It's taken him 17 years to get this "World Record". At that rate he would need another 7 years to match the hypothetical DGB record v England.

I'm just saying.

Rather than that, skull, if you gave DGB back the war years, imagine how many he would have scored? He lost the best years of his career and he would probably have averaged more than 100 if not for that.

skully wrote:Just look up your teledex for me, will ya.

Just follow the link to www.uptheclacker.com.au and look under "big boys welcome" . . .

tac wrote:

skully wrote:Just look up your teledex for me, will ya.

Just follow the link to www.uptheclacker.com.au and look under "big boys welcome" . . .

tac wrote:

skully wrote:Amusing mangling of statistics.

I wonder how many international runs against England DGB would have scored if Aus played say 5 ODIs against them every 2nd year between 1929 and 1948. Excluding the war years that would make approximately 30 ODIs. Let's say DGB averaged a Husseyesque 70 odd in ODIs (not unreasonable, given the man's ability), that would be an additional, say, 2000 runs, taking DGB beyond 7000 international runs v England.

SRT has been playing against Aus since 1991. It's taken him 17 years to get this "World Record". At that rate he would need another 7 years to match the hypothetical DGB record v England.

I'm just saying.

Rather than that, skull, if you gave DGB back the war years, imagine how many he would have scored? He lost the best years of his career and he would probably have averaged more than 100 if not for that.

Aye. 8 years taken out of his peerless career. He played 52 Tests in his 12 years of Test Cricket. So the missing 8 years could have seen him play another, say, 34 Tests. A rough extrapolation (apologies if that's the wrong word, you pedants) may have seen his career stats look something like:

86 Tests - 137 innings - 27 no - 11,000 runs - 100.00 average (forgive me for giving him the 0.06 extra average to right a 60 year old wrong)

12,000 by 110 dismissals doesn't equal an average of 100, mate.

tac wrote:12,000 by 110 dismissals doesn't equal an average of 100, mate.

What?

Poor old skull, you freakus maximus.

Brass Monkey wrote:Poor old skull, you freakus maximus.

Thanks, thanks very much.

skully wrote:

tac wrote:12,000 by 110 dismissals doesn't equal an average of 100, mate.

What?

137 innings - 27 no, average 100.00 . . . . really?


You devious cunut!

tac wrote:

skully wrote:

tac wrote:12,000 by 110 dismissals doesn't equal an average of 100, mate.

What?

137 innings - 27 no, average 100.00 . . . . really?


You devious cunut!

First rule of the forum pedant - always quote the alleged error!!!

Gabba Dan, Minnesota Fats and Carl Rackeman were right when he called you a snadbagger!

Ah young grasshopper, wise man once said "if edit is faster than sledge, tac look like dick."

skully wrote:Just look up your teledex for me, will ya.

RD surely has the 'contact' details