Does anyone miss Zimmy?

suspect he eschews the gals nowadays..have tried to id him but given the level of MONSTRO feral traffic from the worrierites it is remarkably hard to spot him

I think he is VoR.

good grief

hmmn...my second ever post on BF and it seems i have copped a week in the cooler..got an email from a Mr Eagle who it wouls seem is Zimmy informing as follows-

<<Dear Horrorhead,

You have received an infraction at BigFooty.

Reason: 1st Serious
-------
When you post on a team board, you are expected to show respect to the team and abide by that board's rules. This is not optional.

If you plan to continue posting on BigFooty, use your week off to acquaint yourself with the rules of BigFooty.


Quote:
as i noted elsewhere Ms Staker should get 12 months for allowing her son to play with the former drug addled west coast players in the first place and another 12 months for the whinefest...

hall should get 6 weeks (2 for striking staker, 3 for busting the hoarding and 1 for headbutting the fence)

-------

This infraction is worth 5 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.>>

That's pretty gay.

that seems to be the egays way...

i actually watched the match and BBBH does have a bit of a future in boxing if he wants one...can't see willy mason being to keen to get into the ring with him..

stalker however does not have much of a future in that sport, pity as he and his team have little future in the AFL given that limp performance aganist a pretty average swans team

It was a good punch (in terms of decking the bloke he hit) but you've got to remember that in boxing

1. the other bloke is expecting you to swing at him

2. is supposed to be of similar weight and expertise to you

3. is actually looking

4. is guarding himself from being punched

One of the dumbest acts of violence I can remember seeing on a footy field (including country and amateurs)

Agree with your last comment...but not by far the worst act of violence i have seen...deliberate kicking to the head and face, heaps of times I have seen people decked from behind, deliberate elbows to the face...

apparently i once witnessed a kicking at first hand but luckily do not remember it...soon after i gave up footy as i realised i had 3 major deficits -
1 negligible talent
2 a fast mouth
3 slow legs

I've seen worse ...but they were retaliations or in a brawl ...or the bloke was a complete psycho ...

Your second deficit would have been a talent in QBilly football ...

embee wrote:It was a good punch (in terms of decking the bloke he hit) but you've got to remember that in boxing

1. the other bloke is expecting you to swing at him

2. is supposed to be of similar weight and expertise to you

3. is actually looking

4. is guarding himself from being punched

One of the dumbest acts of violence I can remember seeing on a footy field (including country and amateurs)

Aye MB, hard to argue with any of that. It'll be interesting to see how hard the beaks come down on BBBB.

it seems that neither zat not zimmi are even registered as members anymore..

WTF???

They are still on the members' list I just looked up....

not on my list- unless they changed their names

Interesting. If you search by "last visit" you get "Sorry, no user exists" but if you search by "total posts" they both appear. Wonder if that means they have asked to be removed.

If they have asked to be removed then the Heineken Challenge is null and void and they both owe me a Heineken keg ...

embee wrote:If they have asked to be removed then the Heineken Challenge is null and void and they both owe me a Heineken keg ...

phurt...kegs are to be shared

Maybe because they've not posted for ages, they've been timed out by the forum software or Dello even?

Oh FFS people. If you chose the hidden option, you do not appear under "last visit" but strangely enough do appear under "total posts"

Thanks for telling Horrie what's really going on.

taipan wrote:Oh FFS people. If you chose the hidden option, you do not appear under "last visit" but strangely enough do appear under "total posts"

Hehe, they obviously got sick of the "lurking" references.

skully wrote:

taipan wrote:Oh FFS people. If you chose the hidden option, you do not appear under "last visit" but strangely enough do appear under "total posts"

Hehe, they obviously got sick of the "lurking" references.

No, that is how the lurking references came about. They were being tracked under total posts.

meaty, that's what lurking is. They've always been hidden and only appeared on the total posts and alaphabetical members list.

well thank you tech heads - taips and mrs vestral

eowyn wrote:meaty, that's what lurking is. They've always been hidden and only appeared on the total posts and alaphabetical members list.

Ah I see. Thanks Ange.