Does anyone miss Zimmy?

Errrrrr ... what did Fink just say?

Anyone ..............

Merlin wrote:Errrrrr ... what did Fink just say?

Anyone ..............

He's been playing hard to get and the chance is still there if you care to take up his offer . . . I think

No.

Merlin wrote:Anyway - to continue ... Fink doesn't need me as back-up ... and vice versa ...
Unlike some weaklings on here, we don't hunt in packs.

If you say so.

skully wrote:I know it's been done before (*ahem*), but posting someone's PM seems a bit p!ssweak.

I didn't post his PM. I just quoted his earlier post.

I'm not bang up to speed with the wrong'uns on this forum, but wasn't Zat just a truly massive w*nker?

Eric Air Emu wrote:I'm not bang up to speed with the wrong'uns on this forum, but wasn't Zat just a truly massive w*nker?

I thought Zat was fine myself. He's just gone through a phase of can give but not take. It's a stage in life for all Australians apparently...

Eric Air Emu wrote:I'm not bang up to speed with the wrong'uns on this forum, but wasn't Zat just a truly massive w*nker?

No he was aight. Just a wee bit short tempered the last few days he was here.

JKLever wrote:

Eric Air Emu wrote:I'm not bang up to speed with the wrong'uns on this forum, but wasn't Zat just a truly massive w*nker?

I thought Zat was fine myself. He's just gone through a phase of can give but not take. It's a stage in life for all Australians apparently...

I might be getting him mixed up with Tac, but I don't think so- my only experiences of him were him being a charmless piranha of a forummer.

Guess the problem is the Aussie contingent keeps this forum ticking over- nearly 7000 posts from Tac. I sincerley hope it's because he has a job that involves nothing but sitting in front of a computer with unrestricted internet access. I had one of those once.

I thought Zat was OK-ish.

Zim was the really sour and unpleasant character.

Eric Air Emu wrote:I might be getting him mixed up with Tac, but I don't think so- my only experiences of him were him being a charmless piranha of a forummer.

Guess the problem is the Aussie contingent keeps this forum ticking over- nearly 7000 posts from Tac. I sincerley hope it's because he has a job that involves nothing but sitting in front of a computer with unrestricted internet access. I had one of those once.

Out of interest, exactly what did you have?

Nothing but sitting?
A computer?
Unrestricted internet access?
A job?

I too had one each of those once, but not necessarily at the same time!

skully wrote:

taipan wrote:Well we now have 3 pages of missing Zimmy.

He'll be chuffed.

he actually spat the dummy because it took someone so long to notice he was a gone.

What a gay sook

JKLever wrote:

Eric Air Emu wrote:I'm not bang up to speed with the wrong'uns on this forum, but wasn't Zat just a truly massive w*nker?

I thought Zat was fine myself. He's just gone through a phase of can give but not take. It's a stage in life for all Australians apparently...

Valid point, at least with Trev as the example we know that poms enjoy both giving and receiving

Merlin wrote:

Eric Air Emu wrote:I might be getting him mixed up with Tac, but I don't think so- my only experiences of him were him being a charmless piranha of a forummer.

Guess the problem is the Aussie contingent keeps this forum ticking over- nearly 7000 posts from Tac. I sincerley hope it's because he has a job that involves nothing but sitting in front of a computer with unrestricted internet access. I had one of those once.

Out of interest, exactly what did you have?

Nothing but sitting?
A computer?
Unrestricted internet access?
A job?

I too had one each of those once, but not necessarily at the same time!

I had the whole shebang many moons ago now and my god did I forum. I forummed and I forummed and I forummed. It wasn't all it was cracked up to be- you get detached from reality after a while.

Eric Air Emu wrote:I might be getting him mixed up with Tac, but I don't think so- my only experiences of him were him being a charmless piranha of a forummer.

Guess the problem is the Aussie contingent keeps this forum ticking over- nearly 7000 posts from Tac. I sincerley hope it's because he has a job that involves nothing but sitting in front of a computer with unrestricted internet access. I had one of those once.

Eric, thanks for the concern, old son, most touching.

taipan wrote:

skully wrote:

taipan wrote:

horace wrote:most of us have promised to be nice to both zat and zimmy

Speak for yourself

Indeed.

Any second now he will want us to promise to be nice to tac.

You are already very so, aren't you?

HH_pink wrote:

taipan wrote:

skully wrote:

taipan wrote:

horace wrote:most of us have promised to be nice to both zat and zimmy

Speak for yourself

Indeed.

Any second now he will want us to promise to be nice to tac.

You are already very so, aren't you?

Despite all evidence to the contrary, taips insists on thinking me a friend.

What a an odd thread. Men are bigger gossips and more paranoid than women.

There aren't too many "men" on this thread so how would you know?

eowyn wrote:What a an odd thread. Men are bigger gossips and more paranoid women.

Assuming any of these people are men...

skully wrote:

G.Wood wrote:Apparently Zat is in tears (the great sook) that nobody has not not missed him enough to start a thread about him.

It was nice of JD to post Zat's sign-off PM. The lad was fired up.

I didn't.

I bet Pete and you would like to see more Lois on the internet, Mr Lever.

I know nowt, Porky, other than they profess to be men.

skully wrote:

horace wrote:cripes ...i recall reading that ...and so zat has not posted since??..must say that the interchange between JD and Zat was out of character for both

I agree horrie, and no, Zat hasn't posted since.

But he's been online as recently as today, so he still cares...