Poor baby :-(

Here's a question for all you God fearing people..........WHY does he allow things like this to happen?

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-1312228,00.html

That is awesome. I wish I had 2 faces.

Thank god they have not taken the it is an incarnation of the devil / satan stand.

Maybe someone else knows better, but I don't remember Durga having two faces, or even more than one head in any of her forms.

Trev could make twice as much money from the sailors

He's already sewn a pair of tits to his back . . .

Demelza wrote:Here's a question for all you God fearing people..........WHY does he allow things like this to happen?

Because He just doesn't care anymore. The human race hasn't worked out, so he's just hanging back until the inevitable demise of the world, universe, stratosphere or whatever it is he's supposed to be keeping a keen eye on - then he'll go and do something else. Probably write a novel. Have a shave. Who knows?

It's spookily similar to the story of the Flaming Bails.

G.Wood wrote:Trev could make twice as much money from the sailors

I need to get the "laughing on the other side of his face" pun out of the way cos I'm bursting here.
And now I feel really bad.

Dello, are you saying that Dem is a two-faced baby?

Well, looking at last night's effort . . .

Dello wrote:

Demelza wrote:Here's a question for all you God fearing people..........WHY does he allow things like this to happen?

Because He just doesn't care anymore. The human race hasn't worked out, so he's just hanging back until the inevitable demise of the world, universe, stratosphere or whatever it is he's supposed to be keeping a keen eye on - then he'll go and do something else. Probably write a novel. Have a shave. Who knows?

It's spookily similar to the story of the Flaming Bails.

Unless my brother was right all along and this IS hell that we're living in.
We are being punished.

If this was hell God wouldn't have given us the English cricket side

tac wrote:Dello, are you saying that Dem is a two-faced baby?

Well, looking at last night's effort . . .

Seriously though Jack, for the sake of all of those around us, and the animals........ don't you think it's time we stopped this banter?
Or maybe we could just confine it to one thread???

Demelza wrote:

tac wrote:Dello, are you saying that Dem is a two-faced baby?

Well, looking at last night's effort . . .

Seriously though Jack, for the sake of all of those around us, and the animals........ don't you think it's time we stopped this banter?
Or maybe we could just confine it to one thread???

You just need to apologize to eowyn for your cunutish act last night and all will stop . . .

Hell will freeze over before I do that, unless she apologises to me for all her incorrect accusations and to Nigel for betraying his friendship.

Anyway, I thought she wasn't phased by it. That's what you said.

Demelza wrote:Hell will freeze over before I do that, unless she apologises to me for all her incorrect accusations and to Nigel for betraying his friendship.

Anyway, I thought she wasn't phased by it. That's what you said.

It has nowt to do with how she feels . . . I just think that you should apologize. But you can continue to be a cunut if you really want to . . .

tac wrote:But you can continue to be a cunut if you really want to . . .

That's big of you, Jack.

Perhaps that's why they call you Big Jack.

Dello wrote:

tac wrote:But you can continue to be a cunut if you really want to . . .

That's big of you, Jack.

Perhaps that's why they call you Big Jack.

Maybe . . . who knows?

I was brought up to believe that you shouldn't call a woman a c*nt no matter how much you dislike her.

Yoiks, what fun did I miss last night? In one short sentence would be nice. Don't want to flare up hostilities again.

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:I was brought up to believe that you shouldn't call a woman a c*nt no matter how much you dislike her.

C*ntish behaviour is c*ntish behaviour . . . whether by a man or a woman . . . it is offensive to differentiate insults on the basis of sex.

skully wrote:Yoiks, what fun did I miss last night? In one short sentence would be nice. Don't want to flare up hostilities again.

I poked Dem and Dem thought she would get me back by being a cunut to eowyn . . . .

I see. Unfortunate.

tac wrote:

skully wrote:Yoiks, what fun did I miss last night? In one short sentence would be nice. Don't want to flare up hostilities again.

I poked Dem and Dem thought she would get me back by being a cunut to eowyn . . . .

Can I just take you back to the beginning?
Remember that PM that you suggested she show me where you say that you used me to get at Nigel?
Try and remember who actually started all this and who started using other people to get back at someone else and then try and think who it is that should apologise.

Demelza wrote:

tac wrote:

skully wrote:Yoiks, what fun did I miss last night? In one short sentence would be nice. Don't want to flare up hostilities again.

I poked Dem and Dem thought she would get me back by being a cunut to eowyn . . . .

Can I just take you back to the beginning?
Remember that PM that you suggested she show me where you say that you used me to get at Nigel?
Try and remember who actually started all this and who started using other people to get back at someone else and then try and think who it is that should apologise.

Now you're just making stuff up . . .

tac wrote:

skully wrote:Yoiks, what fun did I miss last night? In one short sentence would be nice. Don't want to flare up hostilities again.

I poked Dem and Dem thought she would get me back by being a cunut to eowyn . . . .

You forgot to mention how St eowyn betrayed Nigel's privacy by showing you his emails....... to get back at me for something I hadn't even done.
See you keep missing out the TRUTH.