Hair v ICC, employment tribunal, London, Oct 1st to 9th

It's almost double-NSR.

Henry wrote:Tac, to borrow a quote from Glenn Mcgrath, what does Taipan's c*ck taste like?

After the 'bending over' he's just given you Trev ..I'd guess it tastes of your shit

Henry wrote:Tac, to borrow a quote from Glenn Mcgrath, what does Taipan's c*ck taste like?

What's a ctck?

Something different to a c*ck? You tell me.

Cock

Oh, that's easier then.

You've lost me . . .

This would be a big thread to have to close just because a couple of people couldn't keep their cyber-weenies in their pants.

No-one cares about your crap. This thread isn't about you.

Dello wrote:No-one cares about your crap. This thread isn't about you.

That's not what McFly reckon.

Batfink Begins wrote:

Dello wrote:No-one cares about your crap. This thread isn't about you.

That's not what McFly reckon.

What? Who?

I just spotted Billie Doctrove emerging rather sheepishly from a Ladbrokes shop across the street from the Tribunal offices in Holborn ... appears he took the 1/10 on offer for Hair to win his case ...
clearly bullish about the chances then !!

tac wrote:
What? Who?

Some ginchy kids band. Did a song 'its all about you'. Dello knew. He just didn't want to damage his credibility by nodding to the affirmative. Coward.

say even if hair wins, how enforceable would be the decree on the icc? isnt it HQed in dubai now? could they cock a snook at the courts and refuse to pay the fine? conceivably not hold an icc event in the uk again if need be?

Batfink Begins wrote:

tac wrote:
What? Who?

Some ginchy kids band. Did a song 'its all about you'. Dello knew. He just didn't want to damage his credibility by nodding to the affirmative. Coward.

Obviously...

From crocinfo . . .

In the morning ICC associate board member Prince Tunku Imran of Malaysia told the hearing by phone he had been "concerned" because Hair was apparently the man who stood in the way of the match resuming. "I thought that Darrell had exercised bad judgement on that day by failing to consult with the match referee," he said.

Why are we hearing from Prince Tunku Imran?

The One wrote:say even if hair wins, how enforceable would be the decree on the icc? isnt it HQed in dubai now? could they cock a snook at the courts and refuse to pay the fine? conceivably not hold an icc event in the uk again if need be?

Clearly the employment contract between the ICC and Hair must be governed by UK Law for the tribunal to be heard in London.

If the ICC lose, they can appeal - but judging from past high profile cases, it is unlikely they, as employers, will do that.
Unless of course something significant and applicable, not presented here, comes to light.
In general, Tribunal judgements are observed and the findings/proposed settlements areaccepted.

One thing's for certain, if Hair does win, his contract won't be renewed!!
Not that that will bother him if he gets his compensation.

tac wrote:
"I thought that Darrell had exercised bad judgement on that day by failing to consult with the match referee," he said.

In which case the ICC need to go back and look at their own rule book that says the umpires are the sole arbiters on the field of play.

Merlin wrote:

The One wrote:say even if hair wins, how enforceable would be the decree on the icc? isnt it HQed in dubai now? could they cock a snook at the courts and refuse to pay the fine? conceivably not hold an icc event in the uk again if need be?

Clearly the employment contract between the ICC and Hair must be governed by UK Law for the tribunal to be heard in London.

If the ICC lose, they can appeal - but judging from past high profile cases, it is unlikely they, as employers, will do that.
Unless of course something significant and applicable, not presented here, comes to light.
In general, Tribunal judgements are observed and the findings/proposed settlements areaccepted.

One thing's for certain, if Hair does win, his contract won't be renewed!!
Not that that will bother him if he gets his compensation.

yes but what if icc refuse to pay and sook off to dubai? can they do that?

I can't see Hair winning now Prince Tunku Imran has spoken out against him. He's an important voice that should be respected.

The One wrote:

Merlin wrote:

The One wrote:say even if hair wins, how enforceable would be the decree on the icc? isnt it HQed in dubai now? could they cock a snook at the courts and refuse to pay the fine? conceivably not hold an icc event in the uk again if need be?

Clearly the employment contract between the ICC and Hair must be governed by UK Law for the tribunal to be heard in London.

If the ICC lose, they can appeal - but judging from past high profile cases, it is unlikely they, as employers, will do that.
Unless of course something significant and applicable, not presented here, comes to light.
In general, Tribunal judgements are observed and the findings/proposed settlements areaccepted.

One thing's for certain, if Hair does win, his contract won't be renewed!!
Not that that will bother him if he gets his compensation.

yes but what if icc refuse to pay and sook off to dubai? can they do that?

Then they become criminals. Doesn't exactly look good on the CV - a governing body of a sport refusing to pay up. Not good for the sponsors

The One wrote:

Merlin wrote:

The One wrote:say even if hair wins, how enforceable would be the decree on the icc? isnt it HQed in dubai now? could they cock a snook at the courts and refuse to pay the fine? conceivably not hold an icc event in the uk again if need be?

Clearly the employment contract between the ICC and Hair must be governed by UK Law for the tribunal to be heard in London.

If the ICC lose, they can appeal - but judging from past high profile cases, it is unlikely they, as employers, will do that.
Unless of course something significant and applicable, not presented here, comes to light.
In general, Tribunal judgements are observed and the findings/proposed settlements areaccepted.

One thing's for certain, if Hair does win, his contract won't be renewed!!
Not that that will bother him if he gets his compensation.

yes but what if icc refuse to pay and sook off to dubai? can they do that?

Of course they can do whatever they like.

But if Hair chases them through the Courts, then they're farked - as their action to walk away will reflect badly on them.
And should they lose again, it might cost them more.

Apart from which, them walking away from their responsibilities, will fragment the delicate truce that currently exists between the member countries.
Sad day if that happens.

Gary 111 wrote:I can't see Hair winning now Prince Tunku Imran has spoken out against him. He's an important voice that should be respected.

Indeed . . . what role did the good Prince have in Ovalgate BTW? Can anyone refresh my memory?

tac wrote:

Gary 111 wrote:I can't see Hair winning now Prince Tunku Imran has spoken out against him. He's an important voice that should be respected.

Indeed . . . what role did the good Prince have in Ovalgate BTW? Can anyone refresh my memory?

Running a kebab stall outside the ground at the gasometer end.
Why do you ask?
Did you get a bad kebab that day??

Merlin wrote:

tac wrote:

Gary 111 wrote:I can't see Hair winning now Prince Tunku Imran has spoken out against him. He's an important voice that should be respected.

Indeed . . . what role did the good Prince have in Ovalgate BTW? Can anyone refresh my memory?

Running a kebab stall outside the ground at the gasometer end.
Why do you ask?
Did you get a bad kebab that day??

I'm just wondering why he gave evidence at the hearing.

"Running a kebab stall outside the ground at the gasometer end"

Merlo puts in his application to join the ICC...