Re: Well done Mark Boucher

by beamer Wed 03 Oct 2007, 20:40

furriner wrote:They would give Matt Prior, I'm almost sure of it.

Prior, G.Jones, Read, Nixon and Mustard perhaps! Fair swap?

by furriner Wed 03 Oct 2007, 20:50

beamer wrote:
furriner wrote:They would give Matt Prior, I'm almost sure of it.
Prior, G.Jones, Read, Nixon and Mustard perhaps! Fair swap?

From Eng forummers' comments on their keepers, in this case less may be more. Wink

by Brass Monkey Wed 03 Oct 2007, 22:04

'old on a minute. Moutard has done sweet fiddly fuddly all wrong as of yet. Give the wee mackem a chance without all this Notts sh!tey w@nkerella...

by beamer Wed 03 Oct 2007, 22:07

Batfink Begins wrote:'old on a minute. Moutard has done sweet fiddly fuddly all wrong as of yet. Give the wee mackem a chance without all this Notts sh!tey w@nkerella...

Yeah, he deserves a fair chance. But just suggesting we'd swap all the contenders for the England job for one of the top five keeper/batsmen in the world...

by Gary 111 Wed 03 Oct 2007, 22:15

Read is actually a better wicket-keeper than Boucher though.

by LeFromage Wed 03 Oct 2007, 22:19

Gary 111 wrote:Read is actually a better wicket-keeper than Boucher though.

But a worse batsman than Tsolekile...

by Brass Monkey Wed 03 Oct 2007, 22:22

Dello wrote:
But a worse batsman than Tsolekile...

In the words of Alan Partridge: "Back of the net!"

by HH_pink Thu 04 Oct 2007, 01:09

Well done, Poucher.

by Basil Thu 04 Oct 2007, 01:14

Well done Boucher: only 30 years of age, so (in theory) another 5 years-plus as a test cricketer. (subject to the vagaries of SA selectors)

by taipan Thu 04 Oct 2007, 08:31

Makaveli wrote:I wouldn't let those two bother you Henry, all they seem to do is ridicule others and stir sh!t.

Which specific 2, out of the multitudes, are you referring to?

by tac Thu 04 Oct 2007, 08:33

taipan wrote:
Makaveli wrote:I wouldn't let those two bother you Henry, all they seem to do is ridicule others and stir sh!t.

Which specific 2, out of the multitudes, are you referring to?

Us . . .

by taipan Thu 04 Oct 2007, 08:38

so not Zimmy, Zat, Embee or taily?

by tac Thu 04 Oct 2007, 08:40

taipan wrote:so not Zimmy, Zat, Embee or taily?

Not this time, I think . . .

But it was well worth it. Very Happy

by taipan Thu 04 Oct 2007, 08:44

tac wrote:
taipan wrote:so not Zimmy, Zat, Embee or taily?

Not this time, I think . . .

But it was well worth it.

Got a bit too easy towards the end though.

by tac Thu 04 Oct 2007, 08:46

taipan wrote:
tac wrote:
taipan wrote:so not Zimmy, Zat, Embee or taily?

Not this time, I think . . .

But it was well worth it.

Got a bit too easy towards the end though.

Gary jumping in made it too easy, I agree.

by taipan Thu 04 Oct 2007, 08:49

[quote="tac]
Gary jumping in made it too easy, I agree.[/quote]

Was a class post

by tac Thu 04 Oct 2007, 08:57

taipan wrote:[quote="tac]
Gary jumping in made it too easy, I agree.

Was a class post[/quote]

Made me chuckle . . . Very Happy

by Henry Thu 04 Oct 2007, 09:52

Yeah, there's nothing 'tougher' than a group of losers rounding on someone on an internet forum.....

I dont care, but it's a bit sad that you obviously feel a lot 'bigger' having done it.

by taipan Thu 04 Oct 2007, 09:54

Henry wrote:Yeah, there's nothing 'tougher' than a group of losers rounding on someone on an internet forum.....

I dont care, but it's a bit sad that you obviously feel a lot 'bigger' having done it.

Yes, thanks. Actually feeling pretty good.

by lardbucket Thu 04 Oct 2007, 09:56

Is Mushfiqur Rahim the new Joe Dawes?

by Henry Thu 04 Oct 2007, 09:56

Well that's probably because you havent got the guts to say anything like what you say on here in real life.

by Brass Monkey Thu 04 Oct 2007, 09:58

Not sure what physical prowess has anything to do with anything here.

by taipan Thu 04 Oct 2007, 10:00

Henry wrote:Well that's probably because you havent got the guts to say anything like what you say on here in real life.

Ooh, having lost the argument he now turns aggressive. Very mature.

by Makaveli Thu 04 Oct 2007, 11:54

taipan wrote:
Henry wrote:Yeah, there's nothing 'tougher' than a group of losers rounding on someone on an internet forum.....

I dont care, but it's a bit sad that you obviously feel a lot 'bigger' having done it.

Yes, thanks. Actually feeling pretty good.

And bigger?

by taipan Thu 04 Oct 2007, 11:56

Makaveli wrote:
taipan wrote:
Henry wrote:Yeah, there's nothing 'tougher' than a group of losers rounding on someone on an internet forum.....

I dont care, but it's a bit sad that you obviously feel a lot 'bigger' having done it.

Yes, thanks. Actually feeling pretty good.

And bigger?

Very much so.

by Sponsored content