Yeah Butt no Butt

He said,
"There is loud and clear talk in bookie circles that some English players were paid enormous amounts of money to lose. No wonder there was total collapse of the English side."

And now claims,
"I never intended to question the behaviour and integrity of the England players nor the ECB."

So, just the small matter of explaining the underlined part Ijaz, and then we can all move on...

The PCB needs to answer that underlined part with no ijaz, no butts.

Ijaz Butt . . . something Trev can only dream of . . .

Isn't Tony Yeah Butt the bloke skully puts up to all of us as a potential lord and saviour?

ever hopeful wrote:. No wonder there was total collapse of the English side."[/b]



So, just the small matter of explaining the underlined part Ijaz, and then we can all move on...

England are sh!t


EXPLAINED

More specifically then, he needs to explain the underlined part, coming as it did after what he'd just said:

"English players were paid enormous amounts of money to lose. No wonder there was total collapse of the English side."

He not only said Eng were paid to lose, but he then lied about the fact that he'd said it. He won't apologise about either thing, so he needs to resign. Why is the lying mudslinger still there?

ever hopeful wrote:More specifically then, he needs to explain the underlined part, coming as it did after what he'd just said:

"English players were paid enormous amounts of money to lose. No wonder there was total collapse of the English side."

He not only said Eng were paid to lose, but he then lied about the fact that he'd said it. He won't apologise about either thing, so he needs to resign. Why is the lying mudslinger still there?

... racist

ever hopeful wrote:More specifically then, he needs to explain the underlined part, coming as it did after what he'd just said:

"English players were paid enormous amounts of money to lose. No wonder there was total collapse of the English side."

He not only said Eng were paid to lose, but he then lied about the fact that he'd said it. He won't apologise about either thing, so he needs to resign. Why is the lying mudslinger still there?

Rhetorical?

No, I'd really like to know.

tac wrote:Ijizz Butt . . . something Trev can only dream of . . .

Convivial exchanges on the forum, circa 2010.

Zat wrote:Isn't Tony Yeah Butt the bloke skully puts up to all of us as a potential lord and saviour?

LOL.

This was back in the day when our good mate Emperor Zog refused to confess that he was a raving Pinko Lefty, long after it was obvious that I was a raving Bluey Righty.