The climb continues

And there I was a few days ago thinking that it'll be a while. I certainly have a life, clearly.

I can't comment.

At your current posting rate of a modest 15 per day, you will crack 5,000 and a place in the low 30s within 125 days (4 months) and in just over a year, you'll sail past 10,000 and approach the top 20.

Given PeterCS was once posting at a sizeable rate of 50 posts a day (but alas no longer since the red, soppy, smelly one bullied him out of here), the challenge has been laid down.

Jebus, more stats?

15 meaningless posts a day is fine enough

Meaningless stats is what I do best.

What happened to peterCS??

He got jack of a certain crabby hairyback badgering him.

hairyback as in a South African?

Paul Keating wrote:hairyback as in a South African?

As in RD.

Oh okay thanks

I was thinking of the hairybacked South African that Warney had an affair with.

FFS Ponts

as if a dubber would use the term hairyback against anyone other than a Saffie ...and why would you think a saffie (and basically the only one who post regurlarly enough to drive anyone away) would admit it was him that skully was referring to

stoopid dubber pinko twit

hahahah

i will get my coat

embee wrote:FFS Ponts

as if a dubber would use the term hairyback against anyone other than a Saffie ...and why would you think a saffie (and basically the only one who post regurlarly enough to drive anyone away) would admit it was him that skully was referring to

stoopid dubber pinko twit

RD has claimed credit.

skully was referring to you

and surely PCS is the sole judge of the dingo/meerkat/badger combo that drove him away

embee wrote:skully was referring to you

and surely PCS is the sole judge of the dingo/meerkat/badger combo that drove him away

Skully is mistaken as per usual. And as far as I know PCS has remained silent on the topic.

he may be mistaken ...but Ponts question was about the hairyback that skully referred to and not about who had claimed the credit for PCS getting a life

We could go in circles all day on this.

I could just agree with you and we'd both be wrong ...

Do two wrongs make a right?

Wrong as always, tamps. You clearly have no clue on a number of issues.

But carry on being you. It's so sweet.

Your fascination with a woman's certain bodily function is a touch disturbing though.



What does your analyst make of it?

I'll leave the anal fascination to you.

No originality agian. You must try and lighten up.

I'm sure everyone is bored with tampon's puss and bile (retail stocktaking is such a bitch) so back to the matters at hand.

46th is now t's to his own.

skully wrote:I'm sure everyone is bored with tampon's puss and bile (retail stocktaking is such a bitch) so back to the matters at hand.

46th is now t's to his own.

Back to the female anatomy. You are so predictable..



Retail stocktaking? WTF are you on about?