India v Australia, 6th ODI, Nagpur, 30 October, 2013

Maybe a dry match?

FFS, the only tournaments that should have anything greater than "5th" in game titles are World Cup type events, not some half-arsed, who cares JAMODI event between 2 nations.

melb media has been doing puff pieces on Schoolgirl...great reviews of what a help he has been to Bailey on the Bannie tour...again being cited as being in the running to replace Clarke as skipper in the long term

Almost forgot this was on. Weather is looking good. Should get a full game in.

Ton up to Bailey. Nailed on for the Ashes?

I didn't think Bailey had it in him to produce a run of scores like this. Good on him for doing so though. Can he transfer it to test cricket? We'll see....

India will chase down 350+ here.

WTF were the Aust openers doing for the first 10 overs?

Pretty wow from Bailey but these grounds do the bowlers no favours. India won't be easy to contain either.

351 the target. India clear faves.

JGK wrote:351 the target.  India clear faves.

esp with lightning fast outfield, possibly erratic MJ and possibly ineffective McKay & Faulkner on this pitch.

India paying 3.10s.

Bannies pissing it in.

Dawawn - Gawn

Aus have a stranglehold on this.

India pissing it away.

This series is the essence of clown cricket.

Raina looks a class below in this Indian batting lineup.

Kohli does it again.

You have to be all kinds of gash if you can't defend 350.

England wouldn't have defended 400.

The top five highest run chases in ODI history all have Australia as the bowling side.

PeterCS wrote:England wouldn't have defended 400.

England would've got around 280ao on that pitch.

Nah, 245, with a 'brave' 60 off 75 balls from Trott holding them together in between the soft chips to short cover. India being even braver, getting them in the 30th over for the loss of one wicket.

Only the second time there's been four hundreds in a JAMODI. Wouldn't want to be a bowler in this series.

Henry wrote:Nah, 245, with a 'brave' 60 off 75 balls from Trott holding them together in between the soft chips to short cover. India being even braver, getting them in the 30th over for the loss of one wicket.

I was factoring in the 1 in 8 times Jos Buttler half pays off.

MoH wrote:Only the second time there's been four hundreds in a JAMODI. Wouldn't want to be a bowler in this series.

Or you'd want to be a bowler wasn't completely shithouse.

Not a bad record for Aus. Beaten twice in a series after making 350+ (can they make it 3 times in the last game?). Watching the end of the Aus innings last night as Vague struggled to get the ball off the square in the last 15, I thought 360 was a minimum requirement. We didn't make it.

Well done to the Bannies.

So a decider in Game 700.

why do they keep playing wobblies? Vague is more a red ball batsman