Is the ICC finally getting off its arse about Zimbabwe?

Invader Zim wrote:

So should an Indian treat it as an abuse and just report it?

Go ahead, ya banal wanker.

Nothing is more despicable, hateful, banal and one eyed a creature as you on this whole earth cockhead. Now go look up your dictionary or a thesaurus if you had difficulty understanding that as well. Your continous posts full of drivel against Indians all the time exposes your sick and demented thinking quite clearly as is. Now fark off.

Brass Monkey wrote:

Zat wrote:Danny, I don't take kindly to anyone suggesting my opinions may be 'fatal'.

Zat, you thought that as much as a genuine threat as someone threatening you with candy floss. FFS, you know this place isn't an episode of Columbo. Get a grip. You just wanted to kick something off.

King Qunt Vikas makes the post, and it's my fault? You're weird, man.

Batman wrote:Nothing is more despicable, hateful, banal and one eyed a creature as you on this whole earth cockhead. Now go look up your dictionary or a thesaurus if you had difficulty understanding that as well. Your continous posts full of drivel against Indians all the time exposes your sick and demented thinking quite clearly as is. Now fark off.

Wow, I think I broke it's brain. Cool.

holcs wrote:

The One wrote:

holcs wrote:They are alo quite happy to accpet that financial regularities unearthed by a neutral large global auditing firm were never released at the vote of India.

the votes must be distributed by population in the icc. i always thought it was one member one vote

And you know as it is well documented TO, that whatever the BCCI vote for, so do ZIM, PAK, BANG, SL, WINDIES - that makes 6 votes = majority.

Its all to do with money. If your ignorant enough to think otherwise well, you really do not have much of an idea!

Why would India want to make sure that irregularities were not shown? Maybe because they would lose a vote?

Thats just spiffing for world cricket isn't it!!

oh so 5 independent countries agree with us. you forgot to add the saffies, they usually vote with us. so do the aussies. oh and sometimes the ecb. do countries vote for resolutions that are in their best interests? thats astounding, totally illogical. sounds just like the UN. or FIFA. or any democratic organisation where everyone has a vote

My, he's a true vulgarian.

Zat wrote:
King Qunt Vikas makes the post, and it's my fault? You're weird, man.

He made a post meaning nothing like how you 'construed' it and you've continued to go down that line, even when pointed in the right direction. And probably will do for months now. I, for one, hope Vikas can continually side-step these attempts to make him explode on here. This way of being is not healthy for the forum.

Okay, who are you and what have you done with the real Danny!??!

Brass Monkey wrote:

Zat wrote:
King Qunt Vikas makes the post, and it's my fault? You're weird, man.

He made a post meaning nothing like how you 'construed' it and you've continued to go down that line, even when pointed in the right direction. And probably will do for months now. I, for one, hope Vikas can continually side-step these attempts to make him explode on here. This way of being is not healthy for the forum.

He made the accusation that I was starting threads left, right, and centre on this issue. So to say I provoked him is very rich.

He is as dumb as dog crap.

I had only recently cleared my 'ignore' list. I have now rectified this oversight.

Oh so Zat thinks that it is worth for someone like me going to so much trouble to travel all the way to Aus just to slug out a pathetic piece of worm who isn't even worth the thought in the first place?

Either you are too paranoid or you are a greater w@nk than I gave you credit for.

I am afraid the BCCI obsession has already proven too fatal for you - mentally. You have lost your mind completely now, engulfed in selective about paranoia regarding me that is........

If you feel threatened on an internet forum by strangers, than I would think it is time you met your shrink!

Invader Zim wrote:Okay, who are you and what have you done with the real Danny!??!

What?

The One wrote:

holcs wrote:

The One wrote:

holcs wrote:They are alo quite happy to accpet that financial regularities unearthed by a neutral large global auditing firm were never released at the vote of India.

the votes must be distributed by population in the icc. i always thought it was one member one vote

And you know as it is well documented TO, that whatever the BCCI vote for, so do ZIM, PAK, BANG, SL, WINDIES - that makes 6 votes = majority.

Its all to do with money. If your ignorant enough to think otherwise well, you really do not have much of an idea!

Why would India want to make sure that irregularities were not shown? Maybe because they would lose a vote?

Thats just spiffing for world cricket isn't it!!

oh so 5 independent countries agree with us. you forgot to add the saffies, they usually vote with us. so do the aussies. oh and sometimes the ecb. do countries vote for resolutions that are in their best interests? thats astounding, totally illogical. sounds just like the UN. or FIFA. or any democratic organisation where everyone has a vote

You have just equated the word logical to the ICC! Silly man!

5 independant governing bodies my backside. Very good to see you like to use the BCCI rules world cricket because of our money chat when it suits you, and yet then decide that there are bn5 independant countries when it doesn't.

Wind it in.

You know as well as I do that those 5 countries vote with India for purely financial reasons no other. It does them no good not too, because the immoral feckers who run the BCCI and who have no interest in what is good for world cricket wouldn't give a feck about them if they didn't vote!

Strange how the Saffies who normally vote with you - they are the closest neighbours to the depote's land and they have decided its unacceptable now?

I still see your happy for Crickets governing body in your country to allow $11million to be donated to Mugabe's regime, and be syphoned off!?

Just seems a little odd that one of the chief shit stirrers is calling for calm...

Zat wrote:
He made the accusation that I was starting threads left, right, and centre on this issue. So to say I provoked him is very rich.

He is as dumb as dog crap.

I had only recently cleared my 'ignore' list. I have now rectified this oversight.

Uhhhh...mmmmmmmmmmm........

Yes, he did accuse you of starting threads l,r&c. Still, that's not we're on about. You keep on going on about his threat. There wasn't one.

Invader Zim wrote:Just seems a little odd that one of the chief shit stirrers is calling for calm...

My shit usually has some truth involved.

And I don't get on some hick 'pitchfork session'.

Brass Monkey wrote:

Invader Zim wrote:Just seems a little odd that one of the chief shit stirrers is calling for calm...

My shit usually has some truth involved.

And I don't get on some hick 'pitchfork session'.

Oh, an Alasdair MacLean allusion. A very appropriate one, too.

so they are 5 independent countries that vote with india as its in their interests? sounds like any other organisation then. south africa if they voted against today, then they did so in their own interests today as they didnt want a player revolt. the acb voted with india in the last vote as it was in their interests as well then

as for the $11 million, i'm not happy, i expected that to be the bit where zim is squeezed. i will wait for final thoughts till all details are out though

Brass Monkey wrote:

Zat wrote:
He made the accusation that I was starting threads left, right, and centre on this issue. So to say I provoked him is very rich.

He is as dumb as dog crap.

I had only recently cleared my 'ignore' list. I have now rectified this oversight.

Uhhhh...mmmmmmmmmmm........

Yes, he did accuse you of starting threads l,r&c. Still, that's not we're on about. You keep on going on about his threat. There wasn't one.

Now we've got the 'who started it' bit sorted, there are several ways to interpret what he said, and the implied threat is something that someone else could pick up on. That's my point, and I'm not the only one who read it that way.

As I said, I have corrected the oversight I made earlier, and am leaving it at that.

Zat wrote:
Now we've got the 'who started it' bit sorted, there are several ways to interpret what he said, and the implied threat is something that someone else could pick up on. That's my point, and I'm not the only one who read it that way.

As I said, I have corrected the oversight I made earlier, and am leaving it at that.

Oh f*ck.

Shit....

Now, going back and reading it again I can see it.

I feel so stupid.

Run mate. Run for your life.

Or I suppose you could phone the police - you know his full name.

Because, if you don't watch out, Vikas is coming to get you. He's going to find out where you live from your exposing name of 'Zat', buy a plane ticket and come to cut you up. All because you and he disagreed about something on an internet forum.

Brass Monkey wrote:

Zat wrote:
Now we've got the 'who started it' bit sorted, there are several ways to interpret what he said, and the implied threat is something that someone else could pick up on. That's my point, and I'm not the only one who read it that way.

As I said, I have corrected the oversight I made earlier, and am leaving it at that.

Oh f*ck.

Shit....

Now, going back and reading it again I can see it.

I feel so stupid.

Run mate. Run for your life.

Or I suppose you could phone the police - you know his full name.

Because, if you don't watch out, Vikas is coming to get you. He's going to find out where you live from your exposing name of 'Zat', buy a plane ticket and come to cut you up. All because you and he disagreed about something on an internet forum.

I will sidestep this thread now Danny. It is obvious to everyone here what my 'threat' post meant except this softc--k who deliberately reported it since he had made up his mind to 'fix' me. And this from someone who kept posting sheep screwing icons for months, abused some Subis left right and center and when he got some back, he put up a huge whinge about it. He then quit the forum and then comes crawling back with his tail between his legs. I suppose there is wisdom in your words. This troll is not worth anymore posting time simply. Fark him and his delusions of persecution. I am hoping now that he keeps thinking more of BCCI and ends up in some funny farm for the paranoid and the phobic with his phobias about me and BCCI. I pray for it.

If you think this post was a 'threat' to you as well Zat than you know who to report it too!
:arrow:

You're just pissed off a shit fight started without you...c'mon, admit it...

Brass Monkey wrote:

Zat wrote:
Now we've got the 'who started it' bit sorted, there are several ways to interpret what he said, and the implied threat is something that someone else could pick up on. That's my point, and I'm not the only one who read it that way.

As I said, I have corrected the oversight I made earlier, and am leaving it at that.

Oh f*ck.

Shit....

Now, going back and reading it again I can see it.

I feel so stupid.

Run mate. Run for your life.

Or I suppose you could phone the police - you know his full name.

Because, if you don't watch out, Vikas is coming to get you. He's going to find out where you live from your exposing name of 'Zat', buy a plane ticket and come to cut you up. All because you and he disagreed about something on an internet forum.

Thanks Danny, I knew you'd get it in the end. While you exaggerate to a large degree, someone a bit off the hook could decide to act on it.

Think for a minute how much you know about some other posters. It might be one of the mad subis who lives in Australia.

Shame tac is not here.

He'd love this.

Shame tac is not here.

I've got a cough...does that count?

I am hoping now that he keeps thinking more of BCCI and ends up in some funny farm for the paranoid and the phobic with his phobias about me and BCCI. I pray for it.

I construe that sentence as a treat ... whoops ... sorry ... threat.

PS - WTF happened to the "line through word" function ??

Ah ,,, found it !!
Sorted