FAO Jay, our illustrious leader.

Dello,

Please...

In the name of humanity...

Can you lock (or better yet, delete) the 'What is going on?' thread. It hasn't done anything new since about the second or third post on the first page.

Or install an 'It's just not cricket' thread, where shite like that can be discussed, and the lunatic fringe can expound their conspiracy theories ad nauseam without getting in the way of the cricket.

Thanks.

just ignore the thread...it keeps the raving barker out of the other threads

Can you lock (or better yet, delete) the 'What is going on?' thread.

because it causes you discomfort ?

Can we get an ignore thread button

buckSH wrote:Can you lock (or better yet, delete) the 'What is going on?' thread.

because it causes you discomfort ?

Because it has nothing to do with cricket. And this is a cricket forum.

taipan wrote:Can we get an ignore thread button

Only on condition that those who ignore a thread be prevented from posting in it.

else every second post will be made by some punter who claims to ignore that thread.

Aren't the Indian students in Aus to further their cricket education?

Zat wrote:

buckSH wrote:Can you lock (or better yet, delete) the 'What is going on?' thread.

because it causes you discomfort ?

Because it has nothing to do with cricket. And this is a cricket forum.

why didn't you raise this question when tons of non-cricket threads were being opened ?

buckSH wrote:

taipan wrote:Can we get an ignore thread button

Only on condition that those who ignore a thread be prevented from posting in it.

else every second post will be made by some punter who claims to ignore that thread.

Ponting is a forummer?

Zat wrote:

buckSH wrote:Can you lock (or better yet, delete) the 'What is going on?' thread.

because it causes you discomfort ?

Because it has nothing to do with cricket. And this is a cricket forum.

he would probably have to cull more than half the forum then

taipan wrote:

buckSH wrote:

taipan wrote:Can we get an ignore thread button

Only on condition that those who ignore a thread be prevented from posting in it.

else every second post will be made by some punter who claims to ignore that thread.

Ponting is a forummer?

punter means opportunist.

buckSH wrote:

taipan wrote:

buckSH wrote:

taipan wrote:Can we get an ignore thread button

Only on condition that those who ignore a thread be prevented from posting in it.

else every second post will be made by some punter who claims to ignore that thread.

Ponting is a forummer?

punter means opportunist.

And I was making a pun you twat. Going to look up the meaning of that as well?

>> And I was making a pun you twat. Going to look up the meaning of that as well?

I don't know the level of your education to be able to judge what you know and what you don't know.

Well most here have judged your level of education.

in similar fashion I judged yours.

Make up your mind. In consecutive posts you have contradicted yourself. As I thought logic is'nt your strongest point.

buckSH wrote:

taipan wrote:Can we get an ignore thread button

Only on condition that those who ignore a thread be prevented from posting in it.

else every second post will be made by some punter who claims to ignore that thread.

fair point

The One wrote:

Zat wrote:

buckSH wrote:Can you lock (or better yet, delete) the 'What is going on?' thread.

because it causes you discomfort ?

Because it has nothing to do with cricket. And this is a cricket forum.

he would probably have to cull more than half the forum then

Most reasonable people probably wouldn't have a problem with that.

FFS, Zog, give us a merciful topbottom to fark that sookin' subi thread off the front page.

I'm sure Dello will gratefully give you a Buckys daily whinge thread......

on the IPL forum.

Would be a merciful thing.

skully wrote:FFS, Zog, give us a merciful topbottom to fark that sookin' subi thread off the front page.

skulls, I went for a virtual double TB a few days ago, only for some little qunt to drag it back up again.

Ah, then there's that.

He'll be upset that I used the word little...

shortarse-ist.