Calling Minnesota Fats . . .

embee wrote:

taipan wrote:Actually I was blameless on this one for once.

Didn't you ask him something along the lines of 'what sort of name is Barry?'?

Well if he got the hump over that, we are better off without him.

My name has been slagged all over the place and I'm still here.

"taips, zimmy, embee, horrie and G.wood."

Complete this sentence: Their treatment of MF differed from their treatment of each other in that.....?

. . . there was no anal sex involved.

tac wrote:. . . there was no anal sex involved.

so you had it off with him?

taipan wrote:

embee wrote:

taipan wrote:Actually I was blameless on this one for once.

Didn't you ask him something along the lines of 'what sort of name is Barry?'?

Well if he got the hump over that, we are better off without him.

My name has been slagged all over the place and I'm still here.

It was one of the straws on the camel's back....

Weak bloody straw

taipan wrote:Define some of us.

What do they say? If the cap fits......

Hey, I don't have a problem with teasing people and winding people up, I do it all the time but if the people you do it and don't get responce in kind, leave it be. I forum for fun not having fun from someone in responce doesn't work, so I leave it be with those people.

Some of you don't seem to realise that sometimes less is more. Not responding to someone doesn't give them anything to fight against and an ignored post or thread soon disappears into the ether.

And yes, tac did name the most likely suspects, though there are others. Most of those suspects also know I get them and like them and that this isn't a personal attack on them, only a reiteration of things I've said before about how they go about things sometimes.

Fred Nerk wrote:"taips, zimmy, embee, horrie and G.wood."

Complete this sentence: Their treatment of MF differed from their treatment of each other in that.....?

...it didn't , Fred

However he obviously wasnt taking it well ...and we kept going ...it doesn't make me feel good to know we've driven someone away from the forum ...

eowyn wrote:

taipan wrote:Define some of us.

What do they say? If the cap fits......

Hey, I don't have a problem with teasing people and winding people up, I do it all the time but if the people you do it and don't get responce in kind, leave it be. I forum for fun not having fun from someone in responce doesn't work, so I leave it be with those people.

Some of you don't seem to realise that sometimes less is more. Not responding to someone doesn't give them anything to fight against and an ignored post or thread soon disappears into the ether.

And yes, tac did name the most likely suspects, though there are others. Most of those suspects also know I get them and like them and that this isn't a personal attack on them, only a reiteration of things I've said before about how they go about things sometimes.

Blimey, don't she waffle on.
Blah bla bla......

"Most of those suspects also know I get them and like them and that this isn't a personal attack on them, only a reiteration of things I've said before about how they go about things sometimes."

Well said ...

Thanks, Marty.

embee wrote:

Fred Nerk wrote:"taips, zimmy, embee, horrie and G.wood."

Complete this sentence: Their treatment of MF differed from their treatment of each other in that.....?

...it didn't , Fred

However he obviously wasnt taking it well ...and we kept going ...it doesn't make me feel good to know we've driven someone away from the forum ...

embee, you obviously realize that his leaving was mainly over the stuff in that PM you sent today. He couldn't get other forummers to join in his attack on me, so he was pissed off.

It's done, let's move on . . . . he'll be back, anyway.

Blimey, don't she waffle on.
Blah bla bla......

At least I give kind of a damn about other people and their feelings.

tac

I know you'd like to think this was all about you ...and it mostly is ....but it was other people who caused the final dummy spit .

He may be back ...if he is let's hope we've all learnt something (and he has too)

Pople on this forum need to grow up a bit.
Get over it, FFS.

embee wrote:tac

I know you'd like to think this was all about you ...and it mostly is ....but it was other people who caused the final dummy spit .

He may be back ...if he is let's hope we've all learnt something (and he has too)

Actually, I would like to share the blame, embee. Maybe the PM attack was a symptom not the cause.

Demelza wrote:Pople on this forum need to grow up a bit.
Get over it, FFS.

Well you don't care how your behaviour effects other people, others do.

My behaviour is impeccable at all times.

MB,

People are always coming and going for all kinds of reasons. I took a break myself not long ago, basically because the forum was giving me the sh1ts. And then I came back. At every point in that process the choices were mine. It was his choice to log on, his choice to post, his choice to behave on the forum the way he did.

Taips was right upthread. This is not the place to be if you get the hump too easy. Don't like country music? Best you avoid Tamworth.

Ha! ha!

Fred Nerk wrote:Taips was right upthread.

The voice of reason

Two presses on the caps key were all that stood between you and a visit from my lawyers.....

Fred Nerk wrote:MB,

People are always coming and going for all kinds of reasons. I took a break myself not long ago, basically because the forum was giving me the sh1ts. And then I came back. At every point in that process the choices were mine. It was his choice to log on, his choice to post, his choice to behave on the forum the way he did.

Taips was right upthread. This is not the place to be if you get the hump too easy. Don't like country music? Best you avoid Tamworth.

The forum is without moderation because we didn't like moderation ...but if we all take the "get thicker skin" approach it will just become complete chaos ...

Give abuse to those who can take it ....don't to those who can't ....and stay out of it if you can't take it ...(Barry was told these things too )....but it's something we could all benefit from following

Fred Nerk wrote:Two presses on the caps key were all that stood between you and a visit from my lawyers.....

eowyn wrote:

taipan wrote:Define some of us.

What do they say? If the cap fits......

Hey, I don't have a problem with teasing people and winding people up, I do it all the time but if the people you do it and don't get responce in kind, leave it be. I forum for fun not having fun from someone in responce doesn't work, so I leave it be with those people.

Some of you don't seem to realise that sometimes less is more. Not responding to someone doesn't give them anything to fight against and an ignored post or thread soon disappears into the ether.

And yes, tac did name the most likely suspects, though there are others. Most of those suspects also know I get them and like them and that this isn't a personal attack on them, only a reiteration of things I've said before about how they go about things sometimes.

Does all this refer to Trevor as well?
I think people are often unecassarily harsh on him, yourself included.