Calling Minnesota Fats . . .

Henry can give as good as he gets. He's been posting for years and years and never gone off in a huff, he knows what's what.

taipan wrote:
My name has been slagged all over the place and I'm still here.

Masochism takes several forms.

Merlin wrote:

taipan wrote:
My name has been slagged all over the place and I'm still here.

Masochism takes several forms.

No it's because i know that I am better than the likes of you.

taipan wrote:

Merlin wrote:

taipan wrote:
My name has been slagged all over the place and I'm still here.

Masochism takes several forms.

No it's because i know that I am better than the likes of you.

:laule:
Masochistic AND self-righteous AND self-opinionated.
I'd add "self-made", but that might be wristing risking it a tad.

Are there no end to your 'talents'?

Merlin wrote:

taipan wrote:

Merlin wrote:

taipan wrote:
My name has been slagged all over the place and I'm still here.

Masochism takes several forms.

No it's because i know that I am better than the likes of you.

:laule:
Masochistic AND self-righteous AND self-opinionated.
I'd add "self-made", but that might be wristing risking it a tad.

Are there no end to your 'talents'?

At least jealousy is not one of them. It is one of your specialities.

This gets even better! Jealousy ... FFS!
Gawd, you really are such a drama queen!

Jeez you have a go at me and I am the drama queen. Something has snapped in the perversion you call a mind.

taipan wrote:Jeez you have a go at me and I am the drama queen. Something has snapped in the perversion you call a mind.

Ok I promise not to mention the word "masochism" ever again in your presence.
Clearly it upsets you.

I wasn't going to enter into this, but what the hell...

MF was a first cass goose who carried on with a load of old bollocks and was waaaaaaaaay to sensitive to use a board like this. Holy zarking fardwarks! He was asking for it. I am perfectly happy to share some of the blame - even take all of it - for driving him out, but really, he's no great loss to this board, he contributed nothing.

While I take shots at Trev, and he gives as good as he gets, at least I understand where he;s coming from, and he has an appreciation for cricket. A sad, demented ant twisted interpretation of the universe, but an appreciation of cricket.

MF, on the other hand, was a useless waste of cyberspace and a dickhead.

I asked this on another thread that blew up.

Does it make you feel better abusing someone on a faceless cyberspace internet website?

You think he wasn't hiding behind his keyboard as well? If he carried on in RL the way he behaved here, somebody sooner or later would have taken matters in hand.

Strange ...but I consider Chandan to be too sensitive to use a board like this ...but no one seems to say anything more harsh than the occasional ffs when she asks a seemingly obvious question ...

embee wrote:Strange ...but I consider Chandan to be too sensitive to use a board like this ...but no one seems to say anything more harsh than the occasional ffs when she asks a seemingly obvious question ...

Like you I am surprised she has lasted this long. But I think people realise there is no malice in her

Paul Keating wrote:I asked this on another thread that blew up.

Does it make you feel better abusing someone on a faceless cyberspace internet website?

It does turn on a group of people here, this forum has really good posters but they hardly post anymore all you get is 100% drivel and abuse from the "gang" everyday, sad thing is even when someone new comes in they get jumped on like a pack of wolves and never come back again.

She does ask some farkin obvious questions . . .　

FFS. Tac is a wriggly bugger. Tries to mete out the blame. If Filosofee was driven out by my single comment on her choice of religion(which at the same time wasn't aimed at her), one name-calling of 'clown' and 5 or 6 'Answer the questions, don't bring opinions into fact' then I fear for her in 'the real world'.

She left because she was consistantly pulled up as wrong by many a person and because we didn't agree she decided to go somewhere where her overtly inherent religious train of thought and racially divisive views were shared.

Batfink Begins wrote:FFS. Tac is a wriggly bugger. Tries to mete out the blame. If Filosofee was driven out by my single comment on her choice of religion(which at the same time wasn't aimed at her), one name-calling of 'clown' and 5 or 6 'Answer the questions, don't bring opinions into fact' then I fear for her in 'the real world'.

She left because she was consistantly pulled up as wrong by many a person and because we didn't agree she decided to go somewhere where her overtly inherent religious train of thought and racially divisive views were shared.

Aw diddums . . . I did say you and others.

Makaveli wrote:

Paul Keating wrote:I asked this on another thread that blew up.

Does it make you feel better abusing someone on a faceless cyberspace internet website?

It does turn on a group of people here, this forum has really good posters but they hardly post anymore all you get is 100% drivel and abuse from the "gang" everyday, sad thing is even when someone new comes in they get jumped on like a pack of wolves and never come back again.

And who is this mythical gang supposed to be?

Batfink Begins wrote:FFS. Tac is a wriggly bugger. Tries to mete out the blame. If Filosofee was driven out by my single comment on her choice of religion(which at the same time wasn't aimed at her), one name-calling of 'clown' and 5 or 6 'Answer the questions, don't bring opinions into fact' then I fear for her in 'the real world'.

She left because she was consistantly pulled up as wrong by many a person and because we didn't agree she decided to go somewhere where her overtly inherent religious train of thought and racially divisive views were shared.

I don't think she's left.

taipan wrote:

Makaveli wrote:

Paul Keating wrote:I asked this on another thread that blew up.

Does it make you feel better abusing someone on a faceless cyberspace internet website?

It does turn on a group of people here, this forum has really good posters but they hardly post anymore all you get is 100% drivel and abuse from the "gang" everyday, sad thing is even when someone new comes in they get jumped on like a pack of wolves and never come back again.

And who is this mythical gang supposed to be?

You and tac mostly I suppose.

doremi wrote:

Batfink Begins wrote:FFS. Tac is a wriggly bugger. Tries to mete out the blame. If Filosofee was driven out by my single comment on her choice of religion(which at the same time wasn't aimed at her), one name-calling of 'clown' and 5 or 6 'Answer the questions, don't bring opinions into fact' then I fear for her in 'the real world'.

She left because she was consistantly pulled up as wrong by many a person and because we didn't agree she decided to go somewhere where her overtly inherent religious train of thought and racially divisive views were shared.

I don't think she's left.

No, she comes back to call me a "bitter old man" every now and then.

doremi wrote:

taipan wrote:

Makaveli wrote:

Paul Keating wrote:I asked this on another thread that blew up.

Does it make you feel better abusing someone on a faceless cyberspace internet website?

It does turn on a group of people here, this forum has really good posters but they hardly post anymore all you get is 100% drivel and abuse from the "gang" everyday, sad thing is even when someone new comes in they get jumped on like a pack of wolves and never come back again.

And who is this mythical gang supposed to be?

You and tac mostly I suppose.

So the 2 of us terrorise the entire board. Not sure whether to be proud or not.

Mate, you could terrorize this board with a farkin balloon on a stick. Never seen so many farkin limp-wristed sooks.

tac wrote:
Aw diddums . . . I did say you and others.

Yeah, notice you singled me out. Which is hand-wringing bullsh!t is all. I'm not going to cry and leave. I just think that in that sh!tstorm no-one deserves singling out. Not that I mind. Just seeing your back-tracking "what? what?" coming to the fore and surmising you're a sh!tbag.

Batfink Begins wrote:

tac wrote:
Aw diddums . . . I did say you and others.

Yeah, notice you singled me out. Which is hand-wringing bullsh!t is all. I'm not going to cry and leave. I just think that in that sh!tstorm no-one deserves singling out. Not that I mind. Just seeing your back-tracking "what? what?" coming to the fore and surmising you're a sh!tbag.

Finky, it was just that your posts were so farkin incredibly cutting that I remember you from that thread. I also admit that I was to blame in a small way.