Re: The i-Gen thread

by skully Tue 07 May 2013, 07:08

Here's one that will rile lardy and BD...

The i-Gen thread - Page 7 H10E5797F

by skully Tue 07 May 2013, 07:15

An i-Gen rocket scientist...

The i-Gen thread - Page 7 HDDCCA734

by skully Tue 14 May 2013, 05:01

by G.Wood Tue 14 May 2013, 05:19

skully wrote:

ten years after wrote:Indeed. They forgot to count year 0. It's really 2014 years old

by skully Tue 14 May 2013, 07:06

by lardbucket Tue 14 May 2013, 23:10

G.Wood wrote:
skully wrote:

ten years after wrote:Indeed. They forgot to count year 0. It's really 2014 years old

Do you recall that he eventually decided that the year before the first year AD, but still somehow in the first millennium AD, was the year -1?

by G.Wood Tue 14 May 2013, 23:21

you're making that up shirley

by lardbucket Tue 14 May 2013, 23:22

I'm afraid not.

by G.Wood Tue 14 May 2013, 23:28

He appeared so sensible otherwise.

It's not like "Hearsay" when you weren't surprised that the perp did not get it

by PeterCS Tue 14 May 2013, 23:43

lardbucket wrote:I'm afraid not.

The i-Gen thread - Page 7 A%20frayed%20knot_thumb%5B7%5D

by PeterCS Tue 14 May 2013, 23:45

skully wrote:

Telling his secrets.

If it were genuine.

by PeterCS Tue 14 May 2013, 23:48

skully wrote:I bet this had them scratching their heads...

Someone could reply without retweeting, print out the evidence, take down (hack) Lardy Lad's account, and claim the reward.

by skully Wed 15 May 2013, 01:39

by embee Wed 15 May 2013, 02:16

PeterCS wrote:
skully wrote:I bet this had them scratching their heads...

Someone could reply without retweeting, print out the evidence, take down (hack) Lardy Lad's account, and claim the reward.

....After setting up their own charity

by lardbucket Wed 15 May 2013, 03:23

PeterCS wrote:
skully wrote:I bet this had them scratching their heads...

Someone could reply without retweeting, print out the evidence, take down (hack) Lardy Lad's account, and claim the reward.

Oi. We are not related.