Re: Howard's End

by bodyline Tue 19 Feb 2008, 03:51

For a start - Hockey doesn't have the balls to call LJH john - it would have been:

Mr Howard - Please sir, may I have another.

by Mick Sawyer Tue 19 Feb 2008, 03:56

bodyline wrote:For a start - Hockey doesn't have the balls to call LJH john - it would have been:

Mr Howard - Please sir, may I have another.

snigger

by Zat Tue 19 Feb 2008, 04:43

It showed up what a shitful job LJH had done of his succession planning.

Glad the liddelmudderfarker's gone tbph.

by Invader Zim Tue 19 Feb 2008, 04:52

Was good to see the Libs all basically saying it was the longevity of the government that farked em...not the policies, not the hubris, but the longevity...so basically we all got it wrong by voting em out. Typical born-to-rule liberal mentality.

by Mick Sawyer Tue 19 Feb 2008, 04:55

Zat wrote:It showed up what a shitful job LJH had done of his succession planning.

Glad the liddelmudderfarker's gone tbph.

Apparently Kirribilli is a snottier postcode than Wolstonecraft & that's the foundation of a spiv centrals self-worth assessment.

I'm baffled why Costello, if he coveted the job as much as we think, didn't call for a spill some short time after the lying, murdering rodent renegged on their deal. OK, so Howard's members may have denied him the numbers initially but he gets to slag off the little shit within the Party room & then sits on the back bench waiting for something to break for him.

by Invader Zim Tue 19 Feb 2008, 04:59

Costello was/is a gutless twat.

Wanted the position handed to him on a plate. No ticker. Typical Victorian.

by G.Wood Tue 19 Feb 2008, 05:06

Invader Zim wrote:so basically we all got it wrong by voting em out.

by Mick Sawyer Tue 19 Feb 2008, 05:08

Costello was/is a gutless twat

.

I'd bet that's how history will judge him.

by Invader Zim Tue 19 Feb 2008, 05:10

G.Wood wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:so basically we all got it wrong by voting em out.

Get ****** Zimmy.

by tac Tue 19 Feb 2008, 05:19

Invader Zim wrote:
G.Wood wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:so basically we all got it wrong by voting em out.
Get ****** Zimmy.

Fark . . . you did that well, zimmy.

by bodyline Tue 19 Feb 2008, 06:11

Invader Zim wrote:Was good to see the Libs all basically saying it was the longevity of the government that farked em...not the policies, not the hubris, but the longevity...so basically we all got it wrong by voting em out. Typical born-to-rule liberal mentality.

A bit like Keating being still in denial.

by horace Tue 19 Feb 2008, 06:13

Invader Zim wrote:There was certainly a bit of re-writing of history going on...especially Hockeys assertion that ‘most of the Cabinet' didn't know what Work Choices would do to workers. Whata crock of shit.

zimmy you have forgotten what a bunch of narrow minded inbred ruling class twits half of the Cabinet was...

by Mick Sawyer Tue 19 Feb 2008, 06:14

A bit like Keating being still in denial.

Only about the gay bit. Other than that, with a little levity for his enormous ego, what he says was how it was.

by horace Tue 19 Feb 2008, 06:25

mudt say i really enjoyed 4c last night ...maybe it was schadenfreude...but the sight of those damaged and dmaging people copping their comeuppance was almost as good as a ritual humiliation of the pomgolian test team

by Mick Sawyer Tue 19 Feb 2008, 06:27

It was fun.

by bodyline Tue 19 Feb 2008, 07:04

I found the 4c program pretty tame - nothing surprised me on it. Every man and his dog would have known that Cossie would dump on LJH. I thought Michin weazelled as well as ever, Downer was non committal, Andrew Robb didn't say that much and Christopher Pyne desverves a weekend in jail with Big Bubba for being himself.

But where was the real shock in the whole thing?

by horace Tue 19 Feb 2008, 07:08

<<But where was the real shock in the whole thing?>>

only shock was that they were dumber and more craven than I imagined...costello never had the numbers and was loathed by the body politic even more than the LLR..

the only one who seemed to possess a modicum of decency was Hockey

by JGK Tue 19 Feb 2008, 07:51

Mick Sawyer wrote:
Paul Keating wrote:That Julie Bishop isn't too bad looker either for someone her age.

phurt, she's a protestant, tory, lawyer ponts. She once allowed her boyfriend at uni to cup her breast with his hand. She didn't like it, so they went back inside to the sherry and gowns.

And she has freaky non-blinking eyes.

by Invader Zim Tue 19 Feb 2008, 08:35

That's cos she's not human. She's a lawyer.

by freddled gruntbuggly Tue 19 Feb 2008, 08:45

horace wrote:zimmy you have forgotten what a bunch of narrow minded inbred ruling class twits half of the Cabinet was...

Only half?

by JGK Tue 19 Feb 2008, 12:44

Had to retch today seeing that revolting Connie Hyphen having a go at Kruddy having a "babysitter" for his 14yo son paid for by the taxpayer after 11 years of the little prick maintaining Kirribilli House because his kids wife didn't want to live in Canberra.

Kruddy was quick to say he'd pay for the "babysitter" meaning that eventually when the Tories get back in they will have a much higher accountability benchmark to meet.

by Fred Nerk Tue 19 Feb 2008, 22:33

JGK, who (or indeed what) is 'the revolting Connie Hyphen'?

by Mick Sawyer Wed 20 Feb 2008, 00:21

bodyline wrote:I found the 4c program pretty tame - nothing surprised me on it. Every man and his dog would have known that Cossie would dump on LJH. I thought Michin weazelled as well as ever, Downer was non committal, Andrew Robb didn't say that much and Christopher Pyne desverves a weekend in jail with Big Bubba for being himself.

But where was the real shock in the whole thing?

The shock was that so many chose to go on public record.

by Guest Wed 20 Feb 2008, 00:28

Do we ever get to see a photo of Howard's end?

by Basil Wed 20 Feb 2008, 00:35

Demelza wrote:Do we ever get to see a photo of Howard's end?

You'd really want to?

by Sponsored content