Re: The ICC is funny

by Brass Monkey Thu 17 Apr 2008, 11:41

Whatever f*ckerpoo, you'll only come up with some Rothchilds to the Mayans to kill Loki, the Norse God of mischief or something along those lines.

by *Buckaroo* Thu 17 Apr 2008, 11:41

holcs wrote:
Brass Monkey wrote:
*Buckaroo* wrote:truth hurts .. but facts remain.

Get your facts out then, you little shitweasel. All you do is whinge like some spoilt little bitch with a persecution complex. And I want unequivocal evidence, not some smacked-arse aspersions being cast by you through a cloud of conspiracy theory shit.

All gone quiet since we asked for facts.

He's got himself in a right tizz I bet. Sat at his PC pulling his hair out, with 50 internet tabs open trying to find out some cr@p sorry facts, and then realising that his brain has warped the facts and actual he is living in an alternate reality created by his over zealous perscution complex.

Don't you DARE, fling my question back at me as an argument.

I have asked for ONE INSTANCE when ICC has supported a subi team against Aus/Eng or SA.

the bunch of sad mother-farkers.

by taipan Thu 17 Apr 2008, 11:43

*Buckaroo* wrote:
holcs wrote:
Brass Monkey wrote:
*Buckaroo* wrote:truth hurts .. but facts remain.

Get your facts out then, you little shitweasel. All you do is whinge like some spoilt little bitch with a persecution complex. And I want unequivocal evidence, not some smacked-arse aspersions being cast by you through a cloud of conspiracy theory shit.

All gone quiet since we asked for facts.

He's got himself in a right tizz I bet. Sat at his PC pulling his hair out, with 50 internet tabs open trying to find out some cr@p sorry facts, and then realising that his brain has warped the facts and actual he is living in an alternate reality created by his over zealous perscution complex.

Don't you DARE, fling my question back at me as an argument.

I have asked for ONE INSTANCE when ICC has supported a subi team against Aus/Eng or SA.

the bunch of sad mother-farkers.

Well I suppose a breaking of the rules is a first requirement.

by Batman Thu 17 Apr 2008, 11:43

holcs wrote:
taipan wrote:So I ask again, why allocate tests.

Because its a corrupt state as Batty says, so they can bribe the curator! Duh?!?!

The Govt machinary sure. But I wouldn't blame the poor curator who is usually a temporary worker most times. They have no expertise of making pitches in these small B and C class centers.

Taipan: BCCI will give most small centers matches on rotation basis to win votes at the AGM. Plain and simple. There are many maliases all well documented on the way the BCCI works.

by taipan Thu 17 Apr 2008, 11:47

Sorry, maybe I am missing something.

Firstly you said it cannot be removed from the roster as it is the largest, most populous state.

Now it is a B/C class centre.

by furriner Thu 17 Apr 2008, 11:47

Batman wrote:....Dhoni's Jharkhand was also a part of UP cricket once before it was separated from UP state.

Bihar.

by holcs Thu 17 Apr 2008, 11:47

*Buckaroo* wrote:
holcs wrote:
Brass Monkey wrote:
*Buckaroo* wrote:truth hurts .. but facts remain.

Get your facts out then, you little shitweasel. All you do is whinge like some spoilt little bitch with a persecution complex. And I want unequivocal evidence, not some smacked-arse aspersions being cast by you through a cloud of conspiracy theory shit.

All gone quiet since we asked for facts.

He's got himself in a right tizz I bet. Sat at his PC pulling his hair out, with 50 internet tabs open trying to find out some cr@p sorry facts, and then realising that his brain has warped the facts and actual he is living in an alternate reality created by his over zealous perscution complex.

Don't you DARE, fling my question back at me as an argument.

I have asked for ONE INSTANCE when ICC has supported a subi team against Aus/Eng or SA.

the bunch of sad mother-farkers.

Oh Bucky you really are in a Tizz.

As I have said before, due to my lack of persecution complex I don't keep a running spreadsheet on these things. I have my opinions on where and I quote 'ICC has supported a subi team against Aus/Eng or SA'. However I'm not the one that thinks the ICC is a biased organisation. Incompetant yes, but not biased.

by holcs Thu 17 Apr 2008, 11:48

Batman wrote:
holcs wrote:
taipan wrote:So I ask again, why allocate tests.

Because its a corrupt state as Batty says, so they can bribe the curator! Duh?!?!

The Govt machinary sure. But I wouldn'tblame the poor curator who is usually a temporary worker most times. They have no expertise of making pitches in these small B and C class centers.

Taipan: BCCI will give most small centers matches on rotation basis to win votes at the AGM. Plain and simple. There are many maliases all well documented on the way the BCCI works.

NSR Batty.

by Brass Monkey Thu 17 Apr 2008, 11:48

*Buckaroo* wrote:Don't you DARE, fling my question back at me as an argument.

I have asked for ONE INSTANCE when ICC has supported a subi team against Aus/Eng or SA.

the bunch of sad mother-farkers.

Go on then, you little arseclown - itemise the different discrepancies that have occurred within the ICC - name the laws that have been broken and how the ICC dealt with it, how they should've dealt with it through the rules and regulations and vice versa.

Either that or stop spouting speculative, judgemental shit.

by taipan Thu 17 Apr 2008, 12:09

Of course the fact that, if England, Aus or SA get nailed by the ICC, it doesn't turn into a major sookathon, might have something to do with it.

by holcs Thu 17 Apr 2008, 12:13

taipan wrote:Of course the fact that, if England, Aus or SA get nailed by the ICC, it doesn't turn into a major sookathon, might have something to do with it.

BINGO!!!

by Batman Thu 17 Apr 2008, 13:37

taipan wrote:Sorry, maybe I am missing something.

Firstly you said it cannot be removed from the roster as it is the largest, most populous state.

Now it is a B/C class centre.

You didn't miss anything. It is a large state yes, but not an A class venue for cricket, not much different from those countless venues in all parts of India like Nagpur, Pune, Cuttack, Jaipur, Kochi, Goa etc. Probably fit in C Class venues. A'bad, Chennai and even Delhi is probably B Class and it is India's capital. These venues are not classy enough like say Brabourne, Eden Gardens, Mohali etc where you can expect knowledgeable crowd not decieved by 4s and 6s game, great facilities, good cricket and where pitch preparation is superior comparatively. BCCI rotates matches for all states to win votes. Ever wonder why grounds like Mohali and Kolkotta don't get a test every series?

BCCI does not believe in having test cricket in proper selective venues all year round like in case of England or Aus. It believes in rotation where turn by turn every venue gets to have a match in that order even if that venue is 30 kms outside a city with no toilet facilities.

by taipan Thu 17 Apr 2008, 13:43

Batman wrote:
taipan wrote:Sorry, maybe I am missing something.

Firstly you said it cannot be removed from the roster as it is the largest, most populous state.

Now it is a B/C class centre.

You didn't miss anything. It is a large state yes, but not an A class venue for cricket, not much different from those countless venues in all parts of India like Nagpur, Pune, Cuttack, Jaipur, Goa etc. Probably fit in C Class venues. Delhi is probably B Class and it is India's capital. These venues are not classy enough like say Brabourne, Eden Gardens, Mohali etc where you can expect knowledgeable crowd not decieved by 4s and 6s game, great facilities, good cricket and where facilities and cricket will be good. BCCI needs to rotate matches for all states to win votes. ever wonder why grounds like Mohali and Kolkotta don't get a test every series?

BCCI does not believe in having test cricket in selective venues all year round like in case of England or Aus. It believes in rotation where turn by turn every venue gets to have a match in that order even if that venue is 30 kms outside a city with no toilet facilities.

Fair enough, in future touring teams should refude to accept the itinerary.

I believe the players accomodation was also shocking.

by taipan Thu 17 Apr 2008, 13:46

duplicate post

by Batman Thu 17 Apr 2008, 13:47

Here is a list of Venues in India. Barring Mohali and Kolkotta, most venues are always either flat batting paradises or downright sub-standard turners -

Cricket venues

The worst ones are usually Kochi, Goa, Jaipur, Cuttack, Delhi and Kanpur.

by Basil Thu 17 Apr 2008, 18:58

The only surprise is that people are surprised that the pitch in Kanpur was prepared to suit India.

If the habit of giving a groundsman a token of appreciation becomes widespread, there will be a few minus kneecaps by the end of the year!

by Josh Carney Thu 17 Apr 2008, 23:15

Not the best pitch but it was the same for both teams and the visitors also batted first. SA need to introspect on the way they folded under pressure on Day 3 instead of barking about the pitch.

If Indian players feel sorry for the curators then they should use their influence with BCCI to get them paid better. Dhoni giving money to the curator does not go well whatever the underlying intentions may have been.

by Batman Fri 18 Apr 2008, 06:12

Josh Carney wrote:Not the best pitch but it was the same for both teams and the visitors also batted first. SA need to introspect on the way they folded under pressure on Day 3 instead of barking about the pitch.

If Indian players feel sorry for the curators then they should use their influence with BCCI to get them paid better. Dhoni giving money to the curator does not go well whatever the underlying intentions may have been.

Like I said this 'Bakshish' [giving away to celebrate something'] is not merely confined to Dhoni alone. It's happened here for ages in most matches both domestic and international. It happens in every spere of the society. The sweeper sweeping your building compound, your housemaid cleaning your vessels and home, The Municipality workers working in the sewers, the postmen, The Govt telephone mechanic attending your complaints.....You name it and every person working in labour on low wages expects it all the time. The person fixing your telephone expecting Rs 20 after attending your complain, the sweeper looking forward to a reward of Rs 5 per household, its all par for ages now. You haven't lived here long enough to understand I suppose. It's the mentality of these deprived lots and the feeling of being poor that makes them expect and reach out all the time. People giving away such token actually believe they have done something good for the day.

by horace Fri 18 Apr 2008, 06:28

time for some radical socialism in this country

by Sponsored content