Re: Should Dello close the terrorist thread?

by taipan Thu 11 Dec 2008, 07:09

tac wrote:Oh dear, Nigel chasing cheap points off Bucky again . . .

At least he's a bit tougher than Filo.

by Batman Thu 11 Dec 2008, 07:37

taipan wrote:

No, I called you a qunt, personally, for propagating your ludricous, unproven theories about Pakistani involvement whilst the attacks were still underaway.

To be fair to Bucks, most Indians just KNEW it was a Pakistani operation when it started. We have the most experience in being terrorist targets for 25 years now to know who is capable of such a strike and the moment it started we knew it was LeT and knew it was from Pak. The local Indian traitors like SIMI etc. don't have such a strike capability beyond assembling bombs and planting them. Second there was live TV coverage when it started and there were sufficient clues reported even as the operations started. You need to be an Indian living in India to know where Buck was mouthing off and there is no need to propogate 'ludricious' statements about Pak behind any terror strike because documented fact is that Pak's ISI is involved directly or indirectly - either sending terrorists or establishing sleeper cells to help terrorists in most strikes in many ways then one.

by Guest Thu 11 Dec 2008, 08:05

Invader Zim wrote:
Demelza wrote:
*Buckaroo* wrote:just take a look at zimmy and taips, probably the two biggest insensitive rascist c**ts on this forum
Sorry Bucky but can you give me an example of taips being rascist?
Thanks for your support

Erm . . . remind me who you voted for on the hug thread . . .

by taipan Thu 11 Dec 2008, 08:13

Batman wrote:
taipan wrote:

No, I called you a qunt, personally, for propagating your ludricous, unproven theories about Pakistani involvement whilst the attacks were still underaway.

To be fair to Bucks, most Indians just KNEW it was a Pakistani operation when it started. We have the most experience in being terrorist targets for 25 years now to know who is capable of such a strike and the moment it started we knew it was LeT and knew it was from Pak. The local Indian traitors like SIMI etc. don't have such a strike capability beyond assembling bombs and planting them. Second there was live TV coverage when it started and there were sufficient clues reported even as the operations started. You need to be an Indian living in India to know where Buck was mouthing off and there is no need to propogate 'ludricious' statements about Pak behind any terror strike because documented fact is that Pak's ISI is involved directly or indirectly - either sending terrorists or establishing sleeper cells to help terrorists in most strikes in many ways then one.

I have no problem with that but even you have to admit it was not the time or the place to start mouthing off until the dust had settled.

by *Buckaroo* Thu 11 Dec 2008, 08:15

You are correct, we must start by giving Mugabe the benefit of doubt.

by taipan Thu 11 Dec 2008, 08:18

India always has.

by *Buckaroo* Thu 11 Dec 2008, 08:20

we just emulate those ahead of us in the game.

by taipan Thu 11 Dec 2008, 08:22

*Buckaroo* wrote:we just emulate those ahead of us in the game.

Ah the Nuremburg defence.

by Invader Zim Thu 11 Dec 2008, 23:14

Demelza wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:
Demelza wrote:
*Buckaroo* wrote:just take a look at zimmy and taips, probably the two biggest insensitive rascist c**ts on this forum
Sorry Bucky but can you give me an example of taips being rascist?
Thanks for your support
Erm . . . remind me who you voted for on the hug thread . . .

Well that doesn't make any sense.

by PeterCS Thu 11 Dec 2008, 23:19

You're mebbe looking in the wrong place for sense ... Smile

by Invader Zim Thu 11 Dec 2008, 23:23

Very true

There are some around here with 'a few kangaroos loose in the top paddock', as they say...

by Guest Fri 12 Dec 2008, 05:15

Invader Zim wrote:
Demelza wrote:
Invader Zim wrote:
Demelza wrote:
*Buckaroo* wrote:just take a look at zimmy and taips, probably the two biggest insensitive rascist c**ts on this forum
Sorry Bucky but can you give me an example of taips being rascist?
Thanks for your support
Erm . . . remind me who you voted for on the hug thread . . .
Well that doesn't make any sense.

You made it very clear that you didn't vote for me so why should I support you?

by Zat Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:08

I can't be bothered flicking through 10 pages. Did Dello actually say why he didn't want to lock the terrorist thread?

I can understand why he would n't want to set up an 'off topic' or 'It's just not cricket' sub-forum, because that would mean work. Still think it's a good idea, but.

by Basil Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:12

He probably just thinks it's load of old bollocks

by LeFromage Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:13

And I don't want Bucky to come around to my house and blow me up.

by Zat Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:13

The terrorist thread is a load of old bollocks.

by Basil Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:14

Talking of old bollocks - where's Horrie?

by Zat Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:15

Who cares?

by tac Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:16

Bas, it's Sunday morning . . .why are you thinking about horrie's bollocks?

by Zat Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:17

Bas is channeling Trev?

by PeterCS Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:17

You should be thinking about horlicks.

by Basil Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:23

tac wrote:Bas, it's Sunday morning . . .why are you thinking about horrie's bollocks?

I was thinking more about the crap he usually spouts rather than anything remotely connected to his genitalia, which is making me rather ill as I type this.

by PeterCS Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:24

tac has only one genitalia now?

by Zat Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:25

Wouldn't that be a genitalium?

by Basil Sun 14 Dec 2008, 00:27

PeterCS wrote:tac has only one genitalia now?

......And Himmler's were rather small

by Sponsored content