Hair v ICC, employment tribunal, London, Oct 1st to 9th

filosofee wrote:
And a 'coloured' person would fare better against a, mainly, white establishment? I doubt many, regardless of who they are, would beat the establishment who have the money and the power to lie, cheat and buy off the Judges.

My honest opinion?
Yes he/she would.

But you are right in addressing the "Establishment" involvement.
Winners against the big E are as hard to come by as they were for me at Ascot last Saturday! Five, yes FIVE seconds ....

Buying off judges at a UK Tribunal will be a lot harder though .. if not impossible.

filosofee wrote:

tac wrote:Shaoib and Asif did . . .

In a tribunal in England?

You never specified an English tribunal . . .

she did say mainly white establishment though

The One wrote:she did say mainly white establishment though

Let's look shall we?

And a 'coloured' person would fare better against a, mainly, white establishment? I doubt many, regardless of who they are, would beat the establishment who have the money and the power to lie, cheat and buy off the Judges.

Not terribly clear what she meant, is it? But once you start talking about cheating and buying off judges, then the Shoiab/Asif case is relevant.

yeah, coherrence does not seem to be a strong point. maybe she can use the 'malik' defence

The One wrote:yeah, coherrence does not seem to be a strong point. maybe she can use the 'malik' defence

Well, English isn't her first language . . .

tac wrote:

The One wrote:she did say mainly white establishment though

Let's look shall we?

And a 'coloured' person would fare better against a, mainly, white establishment? I doubt many, regardless of who they are, would beat the establishment who have the money and the power to lie, cheat and buy off the Judges.

Not terribly clear what she meant, is it? But once you start talking about cheating and buying off judges, then the Shoiab/Asif case is relevant.

Is Hair's case being heard in Pakistan or England?

[quote="Merlin"]

My honest opinion?
Yes he/she would.

It's an opinion not a fact

Buying off judges at a UK Tribunal will be a lot harder though .. if not impossible.

Not impossible Merlin, it's been done.

At an Employment Tribunal in High Holborn, London.

filosofee wrote:

tac wrote:

The One wrote:she did say mainly white establishment though

Let's look shall we?

And a 'coloured' person would fare better against a, mainly, white establishment? I doubt many, regardless of who they are, would beat the establishment who have the money and the power to lie, cheat and buy off the Judges.

Not terribly clear what she meant, is it? But once you start talking about cheating and buying off judges, then the Shoiab/Asif case is relevant.

Is Hair's case being heard in Pakistan or England?

Again, it's not clear if you are speaking of Hair specifically or racism cases in general.

If you can't make yourself clear, don't blame other people for not understanding you.

Just out of interest...why is October considered to be a boring month for cricket? There is 20 days of cricket on TV alone, as well as the first chance to see some live cricket since last summer.

Odd thing to say.

Invader Zim wrote:Just out of interest...why is October considered to be a boring month for cricket? There is 20 days of cricket on TV alone, as well as the first chance to see some live cricket since last summer.

Odd thing to say.

You expect fluffy to make sense?

Invader Zim wrote:Just out of interest...why is October considered to be a boring month for cricket? There is 20 days of cricket on TV alone, as well as the first chance to see some live cricket since last summer.

Odd thing to say.

Suppose it's relative to where you live, you Aussie-centric nutsucker.

Soap dodger.

Invader Zim wrote:Soap dodger.

Nonsense! I washed my willy with soap this morning. It smelt like a seafood platter.

Well it is the 1st of the month...

Invader Zim wrote:Well it is the 1st of the month...

Your menstrual cycle started? Apparently Tena have some supersoaking thong-liners. Get in there.

Batfink Begins wrote:

Invader Zim wrote:Well it is the 1st of the month...

Your menstrual cycle started? Apparently Tena have some supersoaking thong-liners. Get in there.

Do they stop foot odour as well?

tac wrote:Do they stop foot odour as well?

Nah, that's what odour eaters are for. Suppose he could whack one of them down there too. He's got room so I've heard - he's a big cnut.

Batfink Begins wrote:Your menstrual cycle started? Apparently Tena have some supersoaking thong-liners. Get in there.

I understood everything in that para apart from 'menstrual', 'Tena', and 'thong-liners'.

Invader Zim wrote:Just out of interest...why is October considered to be a boring month for cricket? There is 20 days of cricket on TV alone, as well as the first chance to see some live cricket since last summer.

Odd thing to say.

It's what the author of the article suggested:

It will never take over from Twenty20 but this tribunal hearing, if the mud starts to be thrown, will save October from being cricket's month of anti-climax.

Full piece in first page, this thread

Luddite. You'll understand at some point.

The One wrote:use the 'malik' defence

You're still stuck like a broken record on that one - hasn't Malik apologised on TV, what do you want, blood?

Batfink Begins wrote:Luddite. You'll understand at some point.

Just googled the term...so it's another name for 'red todger week'?

filosofee wrote:

The One wrote:use the 'malik' defence

You're still stuck like a broken record on that one - hasn't Malik apologised on TV, what do you want, blood?

Please, don't you know about thong-liners?