Tait "I was buggered after one over!"

For those thinking he might come back into the test side, don't hold your breath. When interviewed after the game on ABC radio regarding how quickly he was bowling, he said only for one over and he was buggered after that. He then went on to say "Thank God it wasn't a test match"

If the NSP ever picks Spud for a Test match again, I will personally drive down and kick them.

Clearly, he is only any value in the short forms of the game.

I did wonder why his pace was so down after that blistering first over.

Maybe Five5 is his game.

JGK wrote:I did wonder why his pace was so down after that blistering first over.

Maybe Five5 is his game.

Yep, maximum of one over per bowler. And nobody will bowl a quicker over than him.

That ball that hit AB was a freaking thunderbolt.

Any word on him? It looked like it could have damaged his hip.

Hip bone connected to the heart bone.

{snigger} Jackie didn't look too impressed when he got back on strike.

JGK wrote:{snigger} Jackie didn't look too impressed when he got back on strike.

The fat qunt was out first ball caught off the glove from a Spud thunderqunt.

Out of Tait, Kallis, and DeVilliers, who was the one who gave up cricket for 6 months and sooked off because he couldn't hack it?

JGK wrote:That ball that hit AB was a freaking thunderbolt.

Any word on him? It looked like it could have damaged his hip.

Meh, cross batted swivel swat to a no-ball (chuck) that kept low. Only himself to blame ...
LMAO when his bat knocked the leg stump an inch further into the ground!

You hard-hearted Arse supporter, Merls.

Of course, Tait could be suggesting that Mark Nicholas got hold of him down on the fine leg boundary after that first over....

Henry wrote:Of course, Tait could be suggesting that Mark Nicholas got hold of him down on the fine leg boundary after that first over....

Or Sooky, had he been still in town.

certainly a bit of a shame

why is he so weak?

Probably because he gave up for 6 months. What a delicate flower he is...

Nice sig PP... E=mc^2 is a fascinating law...

It's a pity Tait looks like he isn't going to make it - his fielding at the Oval was some of the most comedic i've seen from an Aussie

Clamson wrote:Probably because he gave up for 6 months. What a delicate flower he is...

Nice sig PP... E=mc^2 is a fascinating law...

yeah its quite amazing!

I remember Rich telling us how he and his mates were giving it to Tait on the boundary in that 2005 oval ashes test, and it looked like he was about to cry.

PlanetPakistan wrote:

Clamson wrote:Probably because he gave up for 6 months. What a delicate flower he is...

yeah its quite amazing!

If you know that, then how can you even suggest him for test cricket?

http://content-ind.cricinfo.com/magazine/content/quote/magazine/index.html

"Built like Tarzan, plays like Jane" is how Ponting assesses Tait!!!

Tait was pretty good tonight.

He was surprisingly accurate at good pace as well.

Agree he was good. Brilliant ball to Boucher.

Shame about the lazy effort at fielding which cost four runs. Game was gone at that stage though.

And the wides is not helping.

Yeah, Bracken and Tait in the field are absolute liabilities.

Atleast Bracken is a decent bowler.