This is pretty crude, I know...

There's pretty much a new star/medal/something I haven't uploaded yet but is bound to be a big hit every 500 posts.

G.Wood wrote:

tac wrote:Ho, ho, farkin ho. You sandbaggers!

Check it out! 3 medals!

Imagine how many medals you would have if you included your posts as GD/MF/Carl as well.

The clique of dingos start to circle again.

tac wrote:

G.Wood wrote:

tac wrote:Ho, ho, farkin ho. You sandbaggers!

Check it out! 3 medals!

Imagine how many medals you would have if you included your posts as GD/MF/Carl as well.

The clique of dingos start to circle again.

I'm just trying to figure out a way to get you to drive you away (after you have gotten rid of horace first)

I'd like to know how jackoff watches from hapanje too.

Oh and Mudge's post was sage as a mothafookin sage patch. Just sweep everything it's never worked before it won't will work again.

Batfink Begins wrote:I'd like to know how jackoff watches from hapanje too.

Oh and Mudge's post was sage as a mothafookin sage patch. Just sweep everything it's never worked before it won't will work again.

It's called technology, ’ｆinkstein.

If you've got an internet connection and know of dodgy links you can watch cricket in Siberia.

JKLever wrote:If you've got an internet connection and know of dodgy links you can watch cricket in Siberia.

Finky certainly knows a lot of "dodgy" links, but maybe not cricket related.

Pretty low of you for making crude remarks of his appearance, Dello.

Hopefully, he breaks his wrist going for a caught-and-bowled early on in his first spell and has to retire. That'll prevent him from taking a record from a man who deserved it.

No doubt it's racism that blinds me, making me dare voice such an opinion. Nothing at all to do with detesting somebody because they do something contrary to the rules of something.

(Something's used to avoid lawsuits).

Dello wrote:Aye, it was just a bit of a laugh rather than a stringent scientific test.

Can't believe his action does come in at anywhere near the accepted limit, though.

Your test was nigh perfection.... nothing wrong with the angles and horizontals.

The reason you cannot believe etc etc etc ... is because the bugger THROWS the ball.
It really is as simple as that.
Throws, chucks (not vomit), projects, flings, shot-puts, jerks-off...
Permutate one from about a dozen descriptions of that action.

BOWLING IT AIN'T.

Early in his first spell? Still not sure he won't have the record already.

Augustus wrote:Hopefully, he breaks his wrist going for a caught-and-bowled early on in his first spell and has to retire. That'll prevent him from taking a record from a man who deserved it.

No doubt it's racism that blinds me, making me dare voice such an opinion. Nothing at all to do with detesting somebody because they do something contrary to the rules of something.

(Something's used to avoid lawsuits).

God, that is such a racist remark Auggie, you ought to be ashamed of yerself.
What rules??? Don't let science and the rule book blind you.
Racism - that's all it is.
Terrible ....

Science and the rule bok seemed to think he didn't chuck. Rule book says 15 degrees, Science measures flex is <15 degrees.

doremi wrote:Science and the rule bok seemed to think he didn't chuck. Rule book says 15 degrees, Science measures flex is <15 degrees.

I really look forward to the day when science has progressed enough to film him DURING a match and without his knowledge - and with all the "angles" in place on the camera ..... just make sure he doesn't get an opportunity to fudge the results as he would be able to in a "controlled environment"..

THEN, I am convinced, he will be shown up for the real chucker he is.

There are times when "science" and the rule book are absolute arses doremi - "assessing" the Murali "action" is one such example.

A total travesty when compared to the fluid and smooth Warne action ... ...

Anniyan wrote:Pretty low of you for making crude remarks of his appearance, Dello.

He's got boggly eyes. What's crude about stating that?

He's got rubbish teeth too, but I'm letting that pass.

I don't care either way. I'm an agnostic as far as the Murali chucking thing is concerned.

Dello wrote:

Anniyan wrote:Pretty low of you for making crude remarks of his appearance, Dello.

He's got boggly eyes. What's crude about stating that?

He's got rubbish teeth too, but I'm letting that pass.

No doubt the latter because of the traditional 'association' between the English and bad teeth. Must be too close to home.

To me it looks like he straightens the arm after the ball is released. Interesting video anyway.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5i8CdcjCQ8k

furriner wrote:

Dello wrote:

Anniyan wrote:Pretty low of you for making crude remarks of his appearance, Dello.

He's got boggly eyes. What's crude about stating that?

He's got rubbish teeth too, but I'm letting that pass.

No doubt the latter because of the traditional 'association' between the English and bad teeth. Must be too close to home.

I've got nice teeth, thanks.

Man for man, I bet the current England team have better teeth than Sri Lanka, too.

British dentistry is pretty good, all told. But expensive. The dregs of society have to make do with rubbish NHS dentistry, but the people who actually matter are well catered for in top-class private dental practices up and down the country.

doremi wrote:I don't care either way. I'm an agnostic as far as the Murali chucking thing is concerned.

Yep, only SRT is god

taipan wrote:

doremi wrote:I don't care either way. I'm an agnostic as far as the Murali chucking thing is concerned.

Yep, only SRT is god

Amen.

doremi wrote:

taipan wrote:

doremi wrote:I don't care either way. I'm an agnostic as far as the Murali chucking thing is concerned.

Yep, only SRT is god

Amen.

To agnostics

Dello wrote:

furriner wrote:

Dello wrote:

Anniyan wrote:Pretty low of you for making crude remarks of his appearance, Dello.

He's got boggly eyes. What's crude about stating that?

He's got rubbish teeth too, but I'm letting that pass.

No doubt the latter because of the traditional 'association' between the English and bad teeth. Must be too close to home.

I've got nice teeth, thanks.

Well done, that man.

Dello wrote:Man for man, I bet the current England team have better teeth than Sri Lanka, too.

I concur.

Unfortunately, they'll be playing cricket there, so unless Prior bares his teeth at the oppo, ...

Dello wrote:British dentistry is pretty good, all told. But expensive. The dregs of society have to make do with rubbish NHS dentistry, but the people who actually matter are well catered for in top-class private dental practices up and down the country.

So, Britain is like exactly India, except the people in India who actually matter also have rubbish teeth.

The england team can't have good teeth, they eat too many jelly babies or jelly beans or whatever that is called. They don't make for good teeth or good relations with opposition batsmen.

doremi wrote:The england team can't have good teeth, they eat too many jelly babies or jelly beans or whatever that is called. They don't make for good teeth or good relations with opposition batsmen.

But I'm sure they brush their teeth afterwards.

In fact, I'd imagine Kevin Pietersen has a kit bag full of 'product' - probably left behind an extra bat to fit in more hair gel and some fake tan.