Re: West Indies v New Zealand, 3rd Test, Bridgetown, 26-30 June, 2014

by PeterCS Sun 29 Jun 2014, 19:47

WIndies getting Kaned.

by Brass Monkey Sun 29 Jun 2014, 21:38

Windies getting Willyupbum'd.

by skully Sun 29 Jun 2014, 21:40

Well done to Kane Williamson. He's been quite prolific of late.

So a drawn series then, unless the Ganjas can get a bag quickly and Crystal goes nuts on Day 5.

by Big Dog Mon 30 Jun 2014, 08:20

Presumably the snoozers will declare overnight. Should make for a tight finish.

by Red Mon 30 Jun 2014, 09:24

Big Dog wrote:Presumably the snoozers will declare overnight. Should make for a tight finish.

Unless they fear the Gayle factor. On the other hand the Windies have a propensity to collapse so they should be brave and go for the win.

by Red Mon 30 Jun 2014, 15:12

Windies in early trouble after the kiwi declaration.

by tricycle Mon 30 Jun 2014, 15:21

Gayle gone and an extended tail.

Williamson has really come leaps and bounds since settling in as the number 3

by Brass Monkey Mon 30 Jun 2014, 16:18

tricycle wrote:
Williamson has really come leaps and bounds since settling in as the number 3

He's like a non-shit, non-FIGJAM version of Joe 'Shitty FIGJAM' Root.

by beamer Mon 30 Jun 2014, 17:52

If Cook was Snoozer captain they would still be batting.

by Brass Monkey Mon 30 Jun 2014, 19:19

Oh dear Windies... 138/6. Doesn't look good!

by taipan Mon 30 Jun 2014, 19:28

Probably all over.

by lardbucket Mon 30 Jun 2014, 21:36

9 down; the umpire gives Taylor out lbw; on review the ball has hit nothing but bat

by Brass Monkey Mon 30 Jun 2014, 21:38

lardbucket wrote:9 down; the umpire gives Taylor out lbw; on review the ball has hit nothing but bat

Nay... Wagner reviewed, the umpire had given it not out. You're lucky - I'm watching both the cricket and the football, so I'm FB's sports correspondent for the night.

by Brass Monkey Mon 30 Jun 2014, 21:41

Shame the Windies haven't a couple more wickets, they need 59 @ 3.68 rpo.

by lardbucket Mon 30 Jun 2014, 21:41

Meh. That's what it says on Cricinfo now, too.

And now the new ball, or have they got that wrong, too?

by Brass Monkey Mon 30 Jun 2014, 21:43

Jerome was going the tonk against the dibblers and the old ball - most likely to get a wicket with Boult and Southee and a new cherry.

by Brass Monkey Mon 30 Jun 2014, 21:44

lardbucket wrote:Meh. That's what it says on Cricinfo now, too.

And now the new ball, or have they got that wrong, too?

I answered you in the form of commentary. FIGJAM.

by skully Mon 30 Jun 2014, 21:50

Welly well well, the Snoozies are gonna win the match and the series. Not a bad effort.

by skully Mon 30 Jun 2014, 21:52

Unless, of course, Shillingford and Taylor can survive 8 overs. Another cracking Test finish.

A rare double failure for Shiv.

by Brass Monkey Mon 30 Jun 2014, 21:53

Review for the sake of it. NZ win. Quite a comeback from them. Great series. Go on Test cricket - shake your rump-ah.

by skully Mon 30 Jun 2014, 21:58

All over. Well played Snoozies. Excellent declaration.

by Brass Monkey Mon 30 Jun 2014, 21:59

Kin ell... Kiwis first non-minnow win away since 2002.

First time Shivnarine has been stumped in Test cricket.

Gosh I wish McCullum was the England captain, as beamer said, we'd probably still be batting.

by skully Mon 30 Jun 2014, 23:59

Aye, great stuff from Mukka.

by PeterCS Tue 01 Jul 2014, 01:07

We might take the Kane toad and Boult too. Wink

by PeterCS Tue 01 Jul 2014, 01:08

Brass Monkey wrote:Kin ell... Kiwis first non-minnow win away since 2002.

First time Shivnarine has been stumped in Test cricket.

Gosh I wish McCullum was the England captain, as beamer said, we'd probably still be batting.

No chance.

198 ao.

by Sponsored content