Forummers you don't know the first name of...

skully wrote:

eowyn wrote:Please.

Very well. I share the same christian name as the CEO of Apple, a famous dead crocodile hunter, and my hero on the cricket field (the most successful Aus captain ever - excluding those pretenders who captained only a handful of matches).

Have you ever thought about changing your name to skully? It seems more appropriate.

*Buckaroo* wrote:I'm not rascist .. not by any stretch or leap of imagination. I just speak up for the downtrodden and underdog.

Is that wrong ?

Um, you keep separating people on the basis of race. You have a superiority complex about your race. Which is nothing like speaking up for the underdog and downtrodden. It's an incorrect and arrogant boast of nothingness all the time, whilst trying to segregate 2-10 groups of human beings as much as possible.

My original statement holds true to this rationale.

So, in essence, suck my balls, you racist piece of sh!t.

But you said the greatest ever Aussie captain? Steve Border?

JGK wrote:

skully wrote:

eowyn wrote:Please.

Very well. I share the same christian name as the CEO of Apple, a famous dead crocodile hunter, and my hero on the cricket field (the most successful Aus captain ever - excluding those pretenders who captained only a handful of matches).

Have you ever thought about changing your name to skully? It seems more appropriate.

Sage.

eowyn wrote:

Kumquats are tiny.....

But highly molestable.

tac wrote:But you said the greatest ever Aussie captain? Steve Border?

No, I said most successful ever. "Greatest" is subjective, "most successful" is objective.

Batfink Begins wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:I'm not rascist .. not by any stretch or leap of imagination. I just speak up for the downtrodden and underdog.

Is that wrong ?

Um, you keep separating people on the basis of race. You have a superiority complex about your race. Which is nothing like speaking up for the underdog and downtrodden. It's an incorrect and arrogant boast of nothingness all the time, whilst trying to segregate 2-10 groups of human beings as much as possible.

My original statement holds true to this rationale.

So, in essence, suck my balls, you racist piece of sh!t.

You're wrong again.

I'm proud of my heritage. And I'm dharmic and I do not believe in discriminating between humans. I'm just having fun.

I ask again .. is it wrong ?

spangler wrote:

eowyn wrote:

Kumquats are tiny.....

But highly molestable.

If you say so.....

*Buckaroo* wrote:
You're wrong again.

I'm proud of my heritage. And I'm dharmic and I do not believe in discriminating between humans. I'm just having fun.

I ask again .. is it wrong ?

Um, for starters, half or more of your posts are all about separating humans of different ethnic origins, so you aren't 'dharmic'. Furthermore, 'having fun' as an excuse is sh!t - it's still posts that are racially segregating.

So, yes, it is wrong to be a trolling racist tw@t.

Go ahead though, there's already 80-90% disdain for your utter tripe of a persona. Maybe you can keep increasing it by carrying on.

Unfortunately for the forum on a whole, that's exactly what you'll do, Yank.

Batfink Begins wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:
You're wrong again.

I'm proud of my heritage. And I'm dharmic and I do not believe in discriminating between humans. I'm just having fun.

I ask again .. is it wrong ?

Um, for starters, half or more of your posts are all about separating humans of different ethnic origins, so you aren't 'dharmic'. Furthermore, 'having fun' as an excuse is sh!t - it's still posts that are racially segregating.

So, yes, it is wrong to be a trolling racist tw@t.

Go ahead though, there's already 80-90% disdain for your utter tripe of a persona. Maybe you can keep increasing it by carrying on.

Unfortunately for the forum on a whole, that's exactly what you'll do, Yank.

hmm..sadly you mistake the wood for the trees.

I haven't posted anything that hasn't been posted by the Aus postors.

But the Aus 'Ange fans club' (AFC from now) seems to be mighty pissed off with me,

At each of their 'fark subi' crusades they ask her to ignore me.

Well then go ahead and ignore me Ange, make their day.

One more subi sacrificed is no big deal.

Ange, isn't going to 'ignore' anyone. Why have you brought me into this?

I know that .. but whose gonna convince those aussies it's pointless to try again and again ?

Not you, dear.

*Buckaroo* wrote:

hmm..sadly you mistake the wood for the trees.

I haven't posted anything that hasn't been posted by the Aus postors.

But the Aus 'Ange fans club' (AFC from now) seems to be mighty pissed off with me,

At each of their 'fark subi' crusades they ask her to ignore me.

Well then go ahead and ignore me Ange, make their day.

One more subi sacrificed is no big deal.

Ooh yeah, poor you. I'll let you in on a little secret - when the Aussies post their divisive knuckle-dragging bullsh!t, it's inbetween their normal conversational style about cricket or something else. You're just pure racism, with a bit of tw@ttishness mixed in :- no substance, bar some lengthy post about some ridiculous paranoid conspiracy theory. Therein lies the inherent difference.

Just quit it boys .. eowyn is not going to 'ignore' me


the reason is ... hair


if I don't put oil on it for two days together ...



they turn red



yes .. I must admit with much trepedition

..


yes


I'm a ginga

Batfink Begins wrote:

Henry Nolonga wrote:This may come as a surprise to come of you guys but my real name isn't Henry Nolonga.

No, but you're a bit shy.

How can you tell?

Henry Nolonga wrote:
How can you tell?

You got flustered by the fact I'm a Love Albatross and you don't mention much about yourself. Shy.

Batfink Begins wrote:Ooh yeah, poor you.I'll let you in on a little secret - when the Aussies post their divisive knuckle-dragging bullsh!t, it's inbetween their normal conversational style about cricket or something else. You're just pure racism, ...

bah .. you yourself subscribe unconsciouly to the 'dhimmi subi' theory.

And you have the guts to call me a rascist .. what an oxy-moron.

*Buckaroo* wrote:
bah .. you yourself subscribe unconsciouly to the 'dhimmi subi' theory.

And you have the guts to call me a rascist .. what an oxy-moron.

Go for it - search for a post I've made with 'Subi' in. I'd love to see my derision. What's that? You wont be able to? Oh dear, you look like a bullsh!tting little c*nt now? Oh dear.

Batfink Begins wrote:

*Buckaroo* wrote:
bah .. you yourself subscribe unconsciouly to the 'dhimmi subi' theory.

And you have the guts to call me a rascist .. what an oxy-moron.

Go for it - search for a post I've made with 'Subi' in. I'd love to see my derision. What's that? You wont be able to? Oh dear, you look like a bullsh!tting little c*nt now? Oh dear.

What I highlighted above (your statements) was exactly the reason the whole fuss in Australia was about. that is applying two different yardstick to different groups of people.

What were you doing when India toured the Aus .. sleeping ?

skully wrote:

eowyn wrote:Please.

Very well. I share the same christian name as the CEO of Apple, a famous dead crocodile hunter, and my hero on the cricket field (the most successful Aus captain ever - excluding those pretenders who captained only a handful of matches).

Hi there Kim!

Batfink Begins wrote:

Henry Nolonga wrote:
How can you tell?

You got flustered by the fact I'm a Love Albatross and you don't mention much about yourself. Shy.

Ah, very good.

Jesus, this thread is expanding pretty quickly.

*Buckaroo* wrote:What I highlighted above (your statements) was exactly the reason the whole fuss in Australia was about. that is applying two different yardstick to different groups of people.

What were you doing when India toured the Aus .. sleeping ?

No it's not. At all. What's going on is simple. I'll have to outline it again. Your comprehension skills are horrendous. I acknowledge that there're stark generalisations coming from the fingers of an Aussie or 5 on here and whilst that meets a reproachful attitude within myself, they still converse, still talk cricket. You, on the other hand, are all about race, championing a country that you don't even live in, oneupmanship, segregationism and nothing else in the slightest.

Where was I during the tw@t versus tw@t series? Just here. Showing disdain for both sides of the ocean. And watching you come up with the biggest load of constant divisive bullsh!t this forum has seen since Lord Lagaan was here.

Firstly I live in India. If you have any doubts regarding that you can confirm with Dello. If I were logging in from elsewhere he would have banned me as Lags-incarnate long ago.

What you are basically peddling is utter hypocrisy ..

If an Aussie calls me a bastard, then it's part of his normal conversation.

But if I call an Aussie a bastard then I am a racist of highest pedigree.

For fark sake can you see what you are floating here ????

You can't see such obvious hypocrisy because you have grown up with it, whereas I on the other hand resent it and shall continue to resent it every possible way.

Fark off, dog-boy, you stupid subi bastard.