Re: Australia v South Africa, 5th ODI, Perth, Jan 30

by horace Fri 30 Jan 2009, 05:58

phurt...now punter has no source of sensible advice

by JGK Fri 30 Jan 2009, 05:59

horace wrote:phurt...now punter has no source of sensible advice that he was going to ignore anyway...

Fixed.

by tac Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:00

Don't matter how bad things get, you know you're farked when you listen to a vomit . . .

by horace Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:06

JGK wrote:
horace wrote:phurt...now punter has no source of sensible advice that he was going to ignore anyway...

Fixed.

which is why you blokes had better start supporting punter..because YT is the only option under serious consideration

by tac Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:10

Apart from Pup and young Hughesy . . .

by Guest Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:12

From behind, doesn't it look like the SA team are wearing yellow suspender belts.

by horace Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:16

tac wrote:Apart from Pup and young Hughesy . . .

pup is thick, lacks a cricket brain and is more injury prone than vawn

phew has to establish himself first...no idea whether he has leadership skills...'spose it does not matter given we have not had a cap with leadership skills since tubby retired

by embee Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:17

horace wrote:
tac wrote:Apart from Pup and young Hughesy . . .

pup is thick, lacks a cricket brain and is more injury prone than vawn

phew has to establish himself first...no idea whether he has leadership skills...'spose it does not matter given we have not had a cap with leadership skills since tubby retired

Good afternoon , qm3...

by embee Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:19

Horrie wrote:pup is thick, lacks a cricket brain and is more injury prone than vawn

...but is still a better option than Ponting

by OP Tipping Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:20

This has got 300 all over it.

Aust to lose by about 40.

by OP Tipping Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:21

"...but is still a better option than Ponting"

I wonder if any of Boycott's sainted aunts are available for captaincy duties.

by horace Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:23

embee wrote:
horace wrote:
tac wrote:Apart from Pup and young Hughesy . . .

pup is thick, lacks a cricket brain and is more injury prone than vawn

phew has to establish himself first...no idea whether he has leadership skills...'spose it does not matter given we have not had a cap with leadership skills since tubby retired

Good afternoon , qm3...

PMSL...??? is clearly out of range today

by JGK Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:27

FFS - we are going to get thrashed by the Saffies seconds.

by horace Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:29

true jgk...i am barracking for the saffy 2nds in the hope a loss to them will see hilditch sacked

by JGK Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:43

Now Punter has given the part timers 11 overs between them. Normally that wouldn't be a problem but Nikki is going at well over a run a ball.

by OP Tipping Fri 30 Jan 2009, 06:44

MJ has been the major disappointment of this tournament, for me.

by embee Fri 30 Jan 2009, 07:07

FFS ...Only Invisible Les seems to be able to get a wicket ...

by Naeem Fri 30 Jan 2009, 07:08

Guess there aren't going to be any hundreds in this series.

by embee Fri 30 Jan 2009, 07:09

dont give up yet ....Morkel has 10 overs and a powerplay

by Naeem Fri 30 Jan 2009, 07:12

He cant come off EVERY time!

by OP Tipping Fri 30 Jan 2009, 07:14

Sad days when Australia is relying on Hopes's bowling to keep us in the match.

by mynah Fri 30 Jan 2009, 07:15

JGK wrote:FFS - we are going to get thrashed by the Saffies seconds.

Nah, we won the toss, which means bad luck this series...

by OP Tipping Fri 30 Jan 2009, 07:17

Seems to be bad luck to have marsupials and large flightless birds on your uniform this summer.

by Naeem Fri 30 Jan 2009, 07:18

I think it was the right choice to bat. The young seamers will be a lot more relaxed in the second innings.

by JGK Fri 30 Jan 2009, 07:19

300 is still on here.

by Sponsored content