ZIM - Change your avatar

JKLever wrote:Do naked Morphs count?

Do they teach maths at Morph schools?

eowyn wrote:You need to use across the board censorship then. taips borderline anorexic needs to be removed as well. That's more disconcerting in that it promotes an unhealthy body image to young girls.

It's nothing to do with what images "promote" or not.

Basic terms and conditions state no nudity.

Not my rules, but the rules that keep us from being deleted.

Dello wrote:

eowyn wrote:You need to use across the board censorship then. taips borderline anorexic needs to be removed as well. That's more disconcerting in that it promotes an unhealthy body image to young girls.

It's nothing to do with what images "promote" or not.

Basic terms and conditions state no nudity.

Not my rules, but the rules that keep us from being deleted.

Then I'd like to complain about RobI. I believe that he's sitting naked at his computer, masturbating over his Aussie-baiting at the moment.

As long as he doesn't post pictures of it, he can do what he likes.

Okay, so bums are out but guns are okay?

It's a crazy mixed up world we live in.

It's not bum. It's bottom.

Invader Zim wrote:Okay, so bums are out but guns are okay?

It's a crazy mixed up world we live in.

Write to your local MP.

I would but the restraining order forbids me to make any contact at all.

Invader Zim wrote:Okay, so bums are out but guns are okay?

It's a crazy mixed up world we live in.

"Dad's gawn dahna dogtrack
Mavva's playin bingo ..."

It's bollocks, bits of string covering nipples make things okay, you are a hypocrite.

Who, me?

Demelza wrote:It's not bum. It's bottom.

Exactly.

Or BATTAM, it looks more like.

It was a bum, not offensive just a bum. Some far more provocative pics have been let go because there is a bit of clothing on show. Pull it all or not.

BOTTOM

TOP...

She sounds like she's getting a bit arsey, if you ask me . . .

eowyn wrote:It's bollocks, bits of string covering nipples make things okay, you are a hypocrite.

Not my rules. Just the rules I'm required to abide by if I want to keep this forum up and running.

Don't like it, write to the hosts and explain why naked bottoms should be allowed.

I think Dellboy is just saying Rules is Rules, eowyn. That it's beyond his control to lay down or decide what may be acceptable or not. However nuts it may be loaded with, and how dubious allowing "this" over banning "that".

I thought it was a fairly tasteful and aesthetic posterior, myself. As arses go.

But then I am not sure I would get into posting softcore here myself. This isn't exactly Loaded. Let alone Nuts.

Hell, it's not even FHM.

Oh.

It's The Dandy.

Its the Beano?

It's The Bash Street Kids.

The Numskulls, more like.


Wi a bit of Oor Wullie thrown in.

I just can't believe it, all it was was a naked bum and that's not 'bad'. (Bottom means the bottom of anything, a bum is a bum, say what you see in my world).

Are all the other provocative photos are okay? Why? Either it's all okay or it's all not. I don't mind any of it, that bum was a lovely. You need to be consistent, allow all or nothing.

I think Dem was referring to what the jolly buxom Asian girl's chanting, A.