Re: Kiki and Sassy to blog for Cricket Australia

by HH_pink Wed 01 Apr 2009, 03:02

I doubt filo is a middle-aged mother of 4.

by tac Wed 01 Apr 2009, 03:05

middle-aged, but not a mother of 4 . . . . unless you start counting the farkin chips on her shoulder . . .

by freddled gruntbuggly Wed 01 Apr 2009, 08:44

Eric Air Emu wrote:[This is Rachel]
taily,

For once, I would love to hear your view.

Well, I've just winced through the 'Saffa Debrief'. Maybe I'm too old to appreciate their style? Maybe they don't sound like air-headed oinks when they talk about Leeg? Maybe they're just pretending to be Reds-in-training? Or maybe I'm just too prejudiced against them by their insistence on 'Saffa', which is just plain WRONG.
Mind, I've just finished a course of root canal therapy and, apart from the bill, the world now looks a better place, so maybe it's a good thing I read that tonight and not a few days ago.

Oh, and with regard to your other comment: "CA will not be allowing negative comments to appear on these pages if they don't have a valid point to make." (my italics)
All depends what they feel is a valid point . . .

by Rachel Wed 01 Apr 2009, 11:25

Well looking at their rugby league site, they were better there because they weren't edited. Without the swearing and borderline libellous remarks, their 'schtick' is reduced to airhead burblings.

Unfortunately, this is a problem with bloggers-turned-writers. The thing that made them worth reading - their ability to have their own agenda and not that of the company they are working for - is the first thing for the chop once they go 'legit'.

by Zat Thu 02 Apr 2009, 01:01

Well, their 'column' is supposed to attract a new audience to cricket.

If the game needs more empty-headed morons to come along and watch it, then it might achieve that.

What an achievement.

by DJ_Smerk Thu 02 Apr 2009, 01:44

Zat wrote:Well, their 'column' is supposed to attract a new audience to cricket.

If the game needs more empty-headed morons to come along and watch it, then it might achieve that.

What an achievement.

I came before Kiki and Sassy, don't worry.

by Zat Thu 02 Apr 2009, 01:57

DJ_Smerk wrote:I came before Kiki and Sassy, don't worry.

Smerk in sexually inadequate fantasy shocker.

by freddled gruntbuggly Thu 02 Apr 2009, 07:51

Maybe he just wanted to get out of the room before they woke up and started talking . . .

by Henry Thu 02 Apr 2009, 08:23

Cricet Australia's brilliant idea- Dumb cricket down and the girls will like it.

by taipan Thu 02 Apr 2009, 08:24

Henry wrote:Cricet Australia's brilliant idea- Dumb cricket down and the girls will like it.

Noice

by Big_Bad_Bob Sat 04 Apr 2009, 14:24

Snigger...

Posted by BBB at 01/04/2009 07:06 AMHey! What a breath of fresh air you guys are! Best of luck with all the blogging, and love the cool phrase 'hetero life mates'. So how are your cricketing skills on the beach? When presented with a row of middle stumps, do you reckon you could knock one out?

Sarcasm and sexual innuendo completely passed the censors by.

by Zat Mon 06 Apr 2009, 02:54

Well done BBB.

by taipan Mon 06 Apr 2009, 07:16

Can't we sign Kiki and Sassy up?

by DJ_Smerk Mon 06 Apr 2009, 07:33

taipan wrote:Can't we sign Kiki and Sassy up?

What to the Forum you mean?

Do you want more people on Ignore Taips?

by taipan Mon 06 Apr 2009, 07:36

DJ_Smerk wrote:
taipan wrote:Can't we sign Kiki and Sassy up?

What to the Forum you mean?

Do you want more people on Ignore Taips?

Yes, we need some nutters now that Bucky has lefr us.

by DJ_Smerk Mon 06 Apr 2009, 07:37

taipan wrote:
DJ_Smerk wrote:
taipan wrote:Can't we sign Kiki and Sassy up?

What to the Forum you mean?

Do you want more people on Ignore Taips?

Yes, we need some nutters now that Bucky has lefr us.

Buckys running around in a new ID isn't he?

by taipan Mon 06 Apr 2009, 07:41

DJ_Smerk wrote:
taipan wrote:
DJ_Smerk wrote:
taipan wrote:Can't we sign Kiki and Sassy up?

What to the Forum you mean?

Do you want more people on Ignore Taips?

Yes, we need some nutters now that Bucky has lefr us.

Buckys running around in a new ID isn't he?

Won't last. Dello is hell on multi ID's

by DJ_Smerk Mon 06 Apr 2009, 07:44

taipan wrote:
DJ_Smerk wrote:
taipan wrote:
DJ_Smerk wrote:
taipan wrote:Can't we sign Kiki and Sassy up?

What to the Forum you mean?

Do you want more people on Ignore Taips?

Yes, we need some nutters now that Bucky has lefr us.

Buckys running around in a new ID isn't he?

Won't last. Dello is hell on multi ID's

One P!sstake too many on my part. (Edit)

by Henry Mon 06 Apr 2009, 08:03

Smerk, do you ever sleep?

by DJ_Smerk Mon 06 Apr 2009, 08:05

Henry wrote:Smerk, do you ever sleep?

That's a very personal question Trev.

I do sleep yes, when the time suits.

Is there a Sleeping rule on the Forum? I can't stay away for too long.

by Zat Tue 07 Apr 2009, 00:28

taipan wrote:
DJ_Smerk wrote:
taipan wrote:Can't we sign Kiki and Sassy up?

What to the Forum you mean?

Do you want more people on Ignore Taips?

Yes, we need some nutters now that Bucky has lefr us.

Wash your mouth out.

by Zat Wed 09 Sep 2009, 23:12

CBF to read whetehr this was mentioned before, but they now have their own site.

http://www.sheknowstherules.com/

Full of glaring errors and ommissions.

Which should go a long way to helping women who use the site to 'learn about sport' sound even less knowledgeable than they are.

I tried to send them some 'feedback' but the send button doesn't seem to actually do anything. Maybe they've already blocked my IP...

Anyway, have a look, virtual minite to the best stuff up you can find there.

By the way, the site is apparently supported by Cricket Australia. No wonder we lost the f*cking Ashes, the people in charge of the game in this country have taken their eye well and truly off the ball...

by Big Dog Thu 10 Sep 2009, 08:57

Who or what is a Kikki & Sassy?
I've seen these innocuous posts on the Cric Oz site but I've never understood the relevance (if any). It just seems like a total waste of bandwidth to me. What is it supposed to represent?
WTF ARE THESE @RSEHOLES??

by lardbucket Thu 10 Sep 2009, 08:57

you were looking for 'relevance'?

by Big Dog Thu 10 Sep 2009, 08:59

lardbucket wrote:you were looking for 'relevance'?

..or deliverence.....one or the other.

by Sponsored content