Mitch throws down the gauntlet to Bopara.

I hate yazall.

tac wrote:Indeed, if he had bowled half-well we wouldn't have needed his batting . . .

BUT tacastrophic...if our batsmen had batted half-well, we also wouldn't have needed his batting.

footwork wrote:

tac wrote:Indeed, if he had bowled half-well we wouldn't have needed his batting . . .

BUT tacastrophic...if our batsmen had batted half-well, we also wouldn't have needed his batting.

They batted exactly half well . . . unfort, bung's bowling fell short of the pass mark . . .

T1 XI should be XI from T3 v Saffers less Ronnie for North.

So sorry fw, no room for Bung.

skully wrote:T1 XI should be XI from T3 v Saffers less Ronnie for North.

So sorry fw, no room for Bung.

I like to see Gump in there somewhere but if you think McGain should play ....................

tac wrote:

footwork wrote:

tac wrote:Indeed, if he had bowled half-well we wouldn't have needed his batting . . .

BUT tacastrophic...if our batsmen had batted half-well, we also wouldn't have needed his batting.

They batted exactly half well . . . unfort, bung's bowling fell short of the pass mark . . .

'Exactly' half well?

You know full well that Lee bowled at least half well.
I demand a re-mark, to prove your statement is well founded.
Otherwise I'll think you're just a well wisher.

footwork wrote:

tac wrote:

footwork wrote:

tac wrote:Indeed, if he had bowled half-well we wouldn't have needed his batting . . .

BUT tacastrophic...if our batsmen had batted half-well, we also wouldn't have needed his batting.

They batted exactly half well . . . unfort, bung's bowling fell short of the pass mark . . .

'Exactly' half well?

You know full well that Lee bowled at least half well.
I demand a re-mark, to prove your statement is well founded.
Otherwise I'll think you're just a well wisher.

Nonsense, the judge's decision is final . . . this is not your farkin HSC, fw . . .

WideWally wrote:

skully wrote:T1 XI should be XI from T3 v Saffers less Ronnie for North.

So sorry fw, no room for Bung.

I like to see Gump in there somewhere but if you think McGain should play ....................

Aye. Oops. Also Gump for Ohma.

McGain, please....

Sorry JKL. File marked both NTPFAA and FYAP (Fark You Are P!ssweak).

Anderson has thrown down the gauntlet to the Aussies.


Anderson warns Australia

Article By:

document.getElementById("articleAuthor").style.display = "none";
Sun, 24 May 2009 11:36


England pace bowler James Anderson has warned Australia that he is only just beginning to fulfil his potential ahead of the Ashes series later this year.

Anderson has taken 22 first-class wickets already this season in just three matches, including nine in a man-of-the-match display in the second Test victory over the West Indies last week.

That impressive form has seen the Lancashire star tipped by experts, including former England coach Duncan Fletcher, as the man capable of helping England regain the Ashes when the Test series starts in July.

The 26-year-old has a chance to fine-tune his game for the titanic clashes with Australia when the second match of the one-day series against the West Indies takes place at Bristol on Sunday.

"I don't think anyone has seen the best of Jimmy Anderson yet," Anderson said.

"I think I've still got improving to do - and I hope I can do that, whether it's through the Ashes series or beyond that.

"I hope I'll be in similar form. It's not that long away, and if I can have a good series here and the Twenty20 World Cup, then it's time to start thinking about the Ashes."

....so in other words, he hasn't warned Australia, or thrown a gauntlet down at all. He hopes to have a good Ashes, is all.

22 wickets in three matches ...that's fantastic news ....with the Anderson cycle that guarantees he'll have a shite Ashes

Is that a woof?

embee wrote:22 wickets in three matches ...that's fantastic news ....with the Anderson cycle that guarantees he'll have a shite Ashes

Damn, i'd forgotten all about the Anderson Cycle. Let's hope its the new up to date 2009 version eh?

I'm not sure there is an Anderson cycle - he's good in England and utter prolapsed rectum overseas.

Robby making an early bid to get 'prolapsed rectum' into the glossary...

tac wrote:

footwork wrote:

tac wrote:

footwork wrote:

tac wrote:Indeed, if he had bowled half-well we wouldn't have needed his batting . . .

BUT tacastrophic...if our batsmen had batted half-well, we also wouldn't have needed his batting.

They batted exactly half well . . . unfort, bung's bowling fell short of the pass mark . . .

'Exactly' half well?

You know full well that Lee bowled at least half well.
I demand a re-mark, to prove your statement is well founded.
Otherwise I'll think you're just a well wisher.

Nonsense, the judge's decision is final . . . this is not your farkin HSC, fw . . .

A basement dweller AND a Judge, tacmaninov?

Phurt at the HSC. You're talking to a PhLee.

skully wrote:T1 XI should be XI from T3 v Saffers less Ronnie for North.

So sorry fw, no room for Bung.

There was 'no room' for Jezuz either, but he managed to make it big.

JKLever wrote:Robby making an early bid to get 'prolapsed rectum' into the glossary...

It's a bona fide Dellogism which I really like.

footwork wrote:

skully wrote:T1 XI should be XI from T3 v Saffers less Ronnie for North.

So sorry fw, no room for Bung.

There was 'no room' for Jezuz either, but he managed to make it big.

Bung is better than Jesus?

Nah that was a Beatle. Bung would never be so irreverent.

Jesus didn't even play cricket so of corpus Lee's better.
And going by the pics, he's better lookin too.

I think that's probably blasphemy.




Jesus had a beard, he must have been better looking.

Blasphemy - isn't that one of the seven dwarfs?

For Saviours and Jazz musicians beards are mandatory and will always be in fashion.

footwork wrote:Blasphemy - isn't that one of the seven dwarfs?

For Saviours and Jazz musicians beards are mandatory and will always be in fashion.

Indeed, even clams (for whom beards have generally been mandatory) are now regarded more favourably when clean shaven . . . .