Re: Hey, anyone remember Stuey?

by taipan Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:24 pm

Zat wrote:It was posted in whatever forum we were inhabiting at the time, too.

He did 3/4 matches on C4. Chandan used to love them, Said it was just like being there.

by Guest Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:26 pm

Invader Zim wrote:Only a banal dickhead like Robi could enjoy the company of JC...

Best I could do, since I'm denied the opportunity to bask in the glow of your Wildean reparté.

by Zat Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:27 pm

taipan wrote:
Zat wrote:It was posted in whatever forum we were inhabiting at the time, too.

He did 3/4 matches on C4. Chandan used to love them, Said it was just like being there.

Chandan? The cut and paste king? Who never used one word when several hundred thousand would do?

by taipan Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:27 pm

Zat wrote:
taipan wrote:
Zat wrote:It was posted in whatever forum we were inhabiting at the time, too.

He did 3/4 matches on C4. Chandan used to love them, Said it was just like being there.
Chandan? The cut and paste king? Who never used one word when several hundred thousand would do?

Yeah. odd that.

by Zat Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:28 pm

Indeed.

by JKLever Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:29 pm

Zat wrote:Good stuff. One of the better forumers we've lost.

aye, Baggies fan I think.

Along with Rizzo.

by Guest Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:29 pm

Zat wrote:
taipan wrote:
Zat wrote:It was posted in whatever forum we were inhabiting at the time, too.

He did 3/4 matches on C4. Chandan used to love them, Said it was just like being there.
Chandan? The cut and paste king? Who never used one word when several hundred thousand would do?

Chandan's a girl, mate.

by Zat Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:30 pm

Rob I wrote:
Zat wrote:
taipan wrote:
Zat wrote:It was posted in whatever forum we were inhabiting at the time, too.

He did 3/4 matches on C4. Chandan used to love them, Said it was just like being there.
Chandan? The cut and paste king? Who never used one word when several hundred thousand would do?

Chandan's a girl, mate.

So's Red, allegedly.

by Brass Monkey Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:30 pm

Rob I wrote:
I didn't meet any of those.

One would have thought that, in a thread about a prior forummer, one could discuss prior forummers without copping abuse.

One would have thought that a bloke who comes onto a forum and either thrusts himself forward as the moral yardstick, presumes he knows about a day's play / entire match without watching one minute of it OR constantly harps back to the 'good old days' where x, y and z were a better calibre of forummer can expect a few digs about it.

by taipan Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:31 pm

JKLever wrote:
Zat wrote:Good stuff. One of the better forumers we've lost.

aye, Baggies fan I think.

Along with Rizzo.

*Rizzo* was a Baggies fan?

by JKLever Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:34 pm

taipan wrote:
JKLever wrote:
Zat wrote:Good stuff. One of the better forumers we've lost.

aye, Baggies fan I think.

Along with Rizzo.

*Rizzo* was a Baggies fan?

Oh, probably.....

by Guest Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:34 pm

Brass Monkey wrote:
Rob I wrote:
I didn't meet any of those.

One would have thought that, in a thread about a prior forummer, one could discuss prior forummers without copping abuse.

One would have thought that a bloke who comes onto a forum and either thrusts himself forward as the moral yardstick, presumes he knows about a day's play / entire match without watching one minute of it OR constantly harps back to the 'good old days' where x, y and z were a better calibre of forummer can expect a few digs about it.

But what has that to do with Stu hopefully coming back?

by JKLever Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:35 pm

Im pretty sure Stuey found his way to the original FB incarnation...

by taipan Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:36 pm

Rob I wrote:
Brass Monkey wrote:
Rob I wrote:
I didn't meet any of those.

One would have thought that, in a thread about a prior forummer, one could discuss prior forummers without copping abuse.

One would have thought that a bloke who comes onto a forum and either thrusts himself forward as the moral yardstick, presumes he knows about a day's play / entire match without watching one minute of it OR constantly harps back to the 'good old days' where x, y and z were a better calibre of forummer can expect a few digs about it.

But what has that to do with Stu hopefully coming back?

About the same as you chucking in JC and Jeff, I would giuess.

by Demelza Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:37 pm

And Chandan!

by JKLever Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:37 pm

RobI gets nostalgic, hardly a crime people...

by Invader Zim Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:39 pm

Rob I wrote:reparté.

And he went to the trouble of typing an 'é'... clown

by Brass Monkey Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:44 pm

Rob I wrote:

But what has that to do with Stu hopefully coming back?

Not plenty, I suppose I just interjected before you went on one of your whimsical reminiscences.

by Brass Monkey Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:47 pm

JKLever wrote:RobI gets nostalgic, hardly a crime people...

No it's not. As I said though, he's only a yardstick, a presumer or a reminiscer. I fancied a dig. Hardly a crime.

by taipan Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:50 pm

Well Stu did mention to me that he missed the banter.

by Demelza Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:58 pm

I hope he doesn't read this thread!

by Zat Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:01 pm

What? And get a false impression about the place?

by Guest Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:02 pm

He would have been put off by the extreme swearing. I bet he never gets called a poo-poo head in his line of work.

by Zat Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:04 pm

Rob I wrote:I bet he never gets called a poo-poo head in his line of work.

I bet he does. But he can do something about it.

by Anniyan Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:09 pm

Has any one heard from Tom Pagan? Is he still alive?

by Sponsored content