Flaming Bails
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

+6
Basil
PeterCS
JKLever
Eric Air Emu
LeFromage
Henry
10 posters

Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by Henry Thu 15 Apr 2010, 16:55

I just think he's been given such a raw deal by the England selectors. Almost without doubt the best keeper in England, and his batting over the last 3-4 years stacks up favourably against any other keeper in the country. He was picked for the T20 side last year and did an excellent job with the gloves, whist getting minimal opportunities with the bat.

Forget Keiswetter and Davies- Foster should be England's reserve keeper.
Henry
Henry


Number of posts : 32891
Reputation : 100
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by LeFromage Thu 15 Apr 2010, 17:35

No.

Batting's too weak. He's a slightly stodgier Chris Read.
LeFromage
LeFromage


Number of posts : 26195
Reputation : 426
Registration date : 2007-08-03
Flag/Background : fra

http://www.flamingbails.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by Eric Air Emu Thu 15 Apr 2010, 18:28

Well Prior's been a decent test keeper/bat for a couple of years now- good to have some stability there. Foster's only got weedy arms and can't hit he ball very far so he's no use in the shorter format stuff.

That's why he's not ahead of any of them.
Eric Air Emu
Eric Air Emu


Number of posts : 1954
Reputation : 8
Registration date : 2007-09-10
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by JKLever Thu 15 Apr 2010, 18:29

He should be ahead of Bedwetter for tests, but as above, his batting isn't that good. Batting at least a place too high for Essex.
JKLever
JKLever


Number of posts : 27236
Reputation : 153
Registration date : 2007-08-06
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by JKLever Thu 15 Apr 2010, 18:30

He's actually a decent one day nurdler and can hit the ball at times (hence the 5 sixes in an over in 'Kanerias' match last year)
JKLever
JKLever


Number of posts : 27236
Reputation : 153
Registration date : 2007-08-06
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by LeFromage Thu 15 Apr 2010, 18:34

JKLever wrote:He should be ahead of Bedwetter for tests, but as above, his batting isn't that good. Batting at least a place too high for Essex.

Pecking order would seem to be: Prior, Davies... Wetter and/or possibly Timbrose. For Tests anyway.

ODIs, Craig Moistsheets looks like he's going to get a run.
LeFromage
LeFromage


Number of posts : 26195
Reputation : 426
Registration date : 2007-08-03
Flag/Background : fra

http://www.flamingbails.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by Eric Air Emu Thu 15 Apr 2010, 18:38

Getting it over that garden fence wasn't a big hit- I bet he had to shin it over to collect those five sixes from Mrs Plumtree's garden as well.

His arms are like the arm equivalent of a flamingo's leg.
Eric Air Emu
Eric Air Emu


Number of posts : 1954
Reputation : 8
Registration date : 2007-09-10
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by LeFromage Thu 15 Apr 2010, 18:42

He's like a short Peter Crouch.
LeFromage
LeFromage


Number of posts : 26195
Reputation : 426
Registration date : 2007-08-03
Flag/Background : fra

http://www.flamingbails.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by JKLever Thu 15 Apr 2010, 18:43

but with very manly essex style stubble...
JKLever
JKLever


Number of posts : 27236
Reputation : 153
Registration date : 2007-08-06
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by LeFromage Thu 15 Apr 2010, 18:45

Stubble in a bottle. Like body glitter.

So Essex. So chav.
LeFromage
LeFromage


Number of posts : 26195
Reputation : 426
Registration date : 2007-08-03
Flag/Background : fra

http://www.flamingbails.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by PeterCS Thu 15 Apr 2010, 19:03

It's Dave Masters you should be training your body-fascist sights on.
PeterCS
PeterCS


Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background : ire

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by Basil Thu 15 Apr 2010, 19:53

Don't see how Foster can be slotted in - best keeper maybe, but where does he bat? No. 8 or 9 probably - no use in a side which more often than not needs to play five bowlers, none of whom (or the likely candidates) are good enough to bat at 6.
Basil
Basil


Number of posts : 16055
Age : 65
Reputation : 72
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by eowyn Thu 15 Apr 2010, 20:46

eh?
eowyn
eowyn


Number of posts : 11132
Age : 124
Reputation : 66
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : yrk

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by taipan Fri 16 Apr 2010, 06:49

Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

He's not a Saffie?
taipan
taipan


Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : saf

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by Henry Sat 17 Apr 2010, 02:44

Well he keeps making runs in County cricket. Not really sure what else he can do.
Henry
Henry


Number of posts : 32891
Reputation : 100
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by DJ_Smerk Sat 17 Apr 2010, 13:35

Mark Wallace scored 79* v Middlesex at Lords yesterday and he doesn't even make it onto Trev's little list.

Poor form, Trev.
DJ_Smerk
DJ_Smerk


Number of posts : 15938
Age : 37
Reputation : 26
Registration date : 2007-09-08
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by Neil D Sat 17 Apr 2010, 21:25

You have to feel sorry for Foster. If he hadn't broken his arm in the nets in 2002 - letting Grandpa Alec back in the team - he might've been England's equivalent of Boucher by now.

As it is, he's been leapfrogged by all sorts in recent years - pensioners (Nixon), window-licking retards (Mustard), giant piles of animal faeces (Read), South Africans (Bedwetter) and bizarre gnome-type creatures (Ambrose).
Neil D
Neil D


Number of posts : 665
Reputation : 12
Registration date : 2007-09-01
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by LeFromage Sat 17 Apr 2010, 21:33

He's had chances to really impress though. His last Lions tour, he scored in binary and that was pretty much the end of that.
LeFromage
LeFromage


Number of posts : 26195
Reputation : 426
Registration date : 2007-08-03
Flag/Background : fra

http://www.flamingbails.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by JKLever Sat 17 Apr 2010, 22:02

And let's face it, if you can't get a go when one of your former teammates is head coach when are you?
JKLever
JKLever


Number of posts : 27236
Reputation : 153
Registration date : 2007-08-06
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them? Empty Re: Shouldn't James Foster be ahead of all of them?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum