Re: Aus Federal Politics thread

by Big Dog Sun 15 May 2011, 08:24

Zat wrote:
Big Dog wrote:
Zat wrote:
lardbucket wrote:not much difference between the parties:

stop the boats
swap the boats
Aye lardy, this week has shown that in the Federal sphere at the moment, it's the Bland versus the Blind. Can we arrange for smallpox to be released into a hermetically sealed Parliament House to kill the lot of them? Qunts, every last one of them.

So...you would rather we be invaded by an armarda of welfare seeking, unemployable, potentially violent, foreigners who care nothing for this country apart from what they can exploit?
BD, if you reckon there's anyone of quality leading on either side of Aussie politics at the moment, then you really need to get your hand off it. Any election we get is now a case of voting for the least worst rather than a good candidate or party. It's not a good situation. The days when our politicians were generally well-respected members of the community who tried to better the place are long gone, now we have a conga line of professional pollies lining up to get their snouts in the trough and get what they can for themselves. They are, almost to a man, or woman, assholes.

Yeah...maybe, although some would argue this has always been the case.

by skully Sun 15 May 2011, 09:17

Hard to argue with Zoggy. It really is dross on either side of the speaker.

Biggest news of the day was the hairdresser's indication that he'd like to ask the Vulture to marry him. Of course, it's all just a front for his real life.

by Big Dog Sun 15 May 2011, 09:24

skully wrote:Hard to argue with Zoggy. It really is dross on either side of the speaker.

Biggest news of the day was the hairdresser's indication that he'd like to ask the Vulture to marry him. Of course, it's all just a front for his real life.

Aye...nothing.....not even marriage, could make an 'honest' women of her.

by skully Sun 15 May 2011, 09:31

"There will be no marriage to my boyfriend in a government I lead."

by Big Dog Sun 15 May 2011, 10:00

skully wrote:"There will be no marriage to my boyfriend in a government I lead."

by Big Dog Sun 15 May 2011, 10:12

The expensive farce that is the NBN revealed:

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/257038,opinion-advance-australia-where.aspx

by skully Sun 15 May 2011, 10:20

Have pinkos delivered anything but farce? It's just the expensive ones, and there have been plenty, that get a run in the news.

by lardbucket Sun 15 May 2011, 10:26

Is the truce over?

by skully Sun 15 May 2011, 10:30

Only one clown wants to argue the truce and fark things up.

The truce only consists of specific references. We are each free to critique the other parties, as long as certain topics are not raised. See the BPCF thread.

by Paul Keating Mon 16 May 2011, 00:09

It's all over. The ALP is poison. Give the other team a go. I have had enough of good people being hacked to death by a biased media. There is no point anymore. Just give the other team a go now.

by skully Mon 16 May 2011, 00:13

Bad weekend, Ponts? You don't seem your normal self. columbo

by G.Wood Mon 16 May 2011, 00:58

How is being a bitter loon not normal for Ponts?

by skully Mon 16 May 2011, 01:17

See Ponts. Now you've been sledged. Now sledge him back. Cool

by Paul Keating Mon 16 May 2011, 02:13

LOL - I would, but somehow I think his comeback and knocks would be stronger and more hard hitting than mine. So I will leave it.

by skully Mon 16 May 2011, 02:22

Paul Keating wrote:LOL - I would, but somehow I think his comeback and knocks would be stronger and more hard hitting than mine. So I will leave it.

Smart man. I usually adopt the same policy with Woody. Well played. Cool

by horace Mon 16 May 2011, 02:43

woody's epitaph "the smaller they are -the smalller they are"

by skully Mon 16 May 2011, 02:50

First rule of sledging, h - make sure there's no typos. Rolling Eyes

by embee Mon 16 May 2011, 02:51

horace wrote:woody's epitaph "the smaller they are -the amller they are"

horries epitaph " hwaislhfisnoutsinthetroughoaehpsrehgwlmanlyuygbronniebishopfq3ofenw;espivsoienswlabourwuhu"

by G.Wood Mon 16 May 2011, 03:02

Paul Keating wrote:LOL - I would, but somehow I think his comeback and knocks would be stronger and more hard hitting than mine. So I will leave it.

Turn it up. I'm softer than Freeo in a big a game

Although, I've never forgiven you for including Paul Okon and johny warren in your all-time gayball socceroo side so I may get that off my chest one day.

by skully Mon 16 May 2011, 03:03

Hehehe, see if you can dig that thread up. Cool

by G.Wood Mon 16 May 2011, 03:08

It was so long ago I think Drunky had not lost the Ashes yet.

It may not even be on this version of FB

by skully Mon 16 May 2011, 03:09

Shame. Sounds like it may have been worth reading for a laff.

by Paul Keating Mon 16 May 2011, 03:12

G.Wood wrote:
Paul Keating wrote:LOL - I would, but somehow I think his comeback and knocks would be stronger and more hard hitting than mine. So I will leave it.

Turn it up. I'm softer than Freeo in a big a game

Although, I've never forgiven you for including Paul Okon and johny warren in your all-time gayball socceroo side so I may get that off my chest one day.

LOL - that might have been the same thread where I got lambasted by the likes of Dello and Lever for not including Henry in an all time EPL eleven.

I still maintain both my stances on Paul Okon and T Henry.

by embee Mon 16 May 2011, 03:12

Has Oz had eleven players good enough to name an all time side or is it Kewell and Cahill 5 times each with either Bosnich or Schwarzer in goal?

by G.Wood Mon 16 May 2011, 03:16

embee wrote:Has Oz had eleven players good enough to name an all time side or is it Kewell and Cahill 5 times each with either Bosnich or Schwarzer in goal?

Paul Keating wrote:err that would be Kewell and Cahill 4 times each + Paul Okon twice.

by Sponsored content