Cricket is BACK baby!
+6
Lara Lara Laughs
PeterCS
taipan
Henry
JKLever
Brass Monkey
10 posters
The Flaming Bails Cricket ForumPage 1 of 4
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4 
Cricket is BACK baby!
by Brass Monkey Wed 12 Oct 2011, 22:07
Ind v Eng - 1 T20I, 5 ODIs
SA v Aus - 2 T20Is, 3 ODIs, 2 Tests
Pak v SL - 3 Tests, 5 ODIs, 1 T20I
Zim v NZ - 2 T20Is, 3 ODIs, 1 Test
Ban v WI - 1 T20I(Ban won), 3 ODIs, 2 Tests
Check this sh!t. OK, mainly unsatisfactory in terms of the matches being played, but it beats the sh!t out of half-heartedly supporting the non-IPL side. Just as a 'bit of fun', name the winners if you see fit, we'll chuck a 1er in each and the proceeds go to the donut-punching factory in Hounslow.
Ind v Eng: T20 - 1-0 Eng; ODIs - 3-1 Ind
SA v Aus: T20 - 1-1; ODIs - 2-1 Aus; Tests - 1-0 SA
Pak v SL: Tests - 1-0 SL; ODIs - 3-2 SL; T20 - 1-0 Pak
Zim v NZ: T20 - 2-0 NZ; ODIs - 2-1 NZ; Test - 0-0
Ban v WI - ODIs - 2-1 WI; Tests - 1-1
SA v Aus - 2 T20Is, 3 ODIs, 2 Tests
Pak v SL - 3 Tests, 5 ODIs, 1 T20I
Zim v NZ - 2 T20Is, 3 ODIs, 1 Test
Ban v WI - 1 T20I(Ban won), 3 ODIs, 2 Tests
Check this sh!t. OK, mainly unsatisfactory in terms of the matches being played, but it beats the sh!t out of half-heartedly supporting the non-IPL side. Just as a 'bit of fun', name the winners if you see fit, we'll chuck a 1er in each and the proceeds go to the donut-punching factory in Hounslow.
Ind v Eng: T20 - 1-0 Eng; ODIs - 3-1 Ind
SA v Aus: T20 - 1-1; ODIs - 2-1 Aus; Tests - 1-0 SA
Pak v SL: Tests - 1-0 SL; ODIs - 3-2 SL; T20 - 1-0 Pak
Zim v NZ: T20 - 2-0 NZ; ODIs - 2-1 NZ; Test - 0-0
Ban v WI - ODIs - 2-1 WI; Tests - 1-1
Brass Monkey
- Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background :
-
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by JKLever Thu 13 Oct 2011, 00:14
Ind v Eng: T20 - 1-0 Ind; ODIs - 4-1 Ind (if we're lucky)
SA v Aus: T20 - 1-1; ODIs - 2-1 SA; Tests - 1-1
Pak v SL: Tests - 1-1 SL; ODIs - 3-2 SL; T20 - 1-0 SL
Zim v NZ: T20 - 2-0 NZ; ODIs - 3-0 NZ; Test - 1-0
Ban v WI - ODIs - 2-1 Ban; Tests - 2-0 BAN
SA v Aus: T20 - 1-1; ODIs - 2-1 SA; Tests - 1-1
Pak v SL: Tests - 1-1 SL; ODIs - 3-2 SL; T20 - 1-0 SL
Zim v NZ: T20 - 2-0 NZ; ODIs - 3-0 NZ; Test - 1-0
Ban v WI - ODIs - 2-1 Ban; Tests - 2-0 BAN
JKLever
- Number of posts : 27236
Reputation : 153
Registration date : 2007-08-06
Flag/Background :
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Henry Thu 13 Oct 2011, 05:32
Ind v Eng - T20- India, ODIs-3-2- England
SA v Aus - T20s-1-1, ODIs- 2-1-RSA, Tests- 1-1
Pak v SL - Tests-1-0-Pak, ODIs- 3-2- SL, T20- Pak
Zim v NZ - T20s- 1-1, ODIs- 3-0-NZ, Test- Draw
Ban v WI - ODIs- 2-1-WI, Tests- 1-0-WI
SA v Aus - T20s-1-1, ODIs- 2-1-RSA, Tests- 1-1
Pak v SL - Tests-1-0-Pak, ODIs- 3-2- SL, T20- Pak
Zim v NZ - T20s- 1-1, ODIs- 3-0-NZ, Test- Draw
Ban v WI - ODIs- 2-1-WI, Tests- 1-0-WI
Henry
- Number of posts : 32891
Reputation : 100
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Brass Monkey Thu 13 Oct 2011, 08:40
Blimey, Lever has some faith in the disarrayed Banglas. I reckon the WI attack will be too much for them, not the batsmen obviously.
Pak/SL is tough to call because of the likely ultra-gash pitches.
Strines/Hairy is tough because you don't know which SA will turn up, or which Aus either.
Pak/SL is tough to call because of the likely ultra-gash pitches.
Strines/Hairy is tough because you don't know which SA will turn up, or which Aus either.
Brass Monkey- Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : -
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Henry Thu 13 Oct 2011, 09:30
Brass Monkey wrote:Blimey, Lever has some faith in the disarrayed Banglas. I reckon the WI attack will be too much for them, not the batsmen obviously.
Pak/SL is tough to call because of the likely ultra-gash pitches.
Strines/Hairy is tough because you don't know which SA will turn up, or which Aus either.
Hardly. We all know that for South Africa, the "ooooohhhh yaaaarrrr Daylo!", 'school girl screams when we take a wicket' team will turn up, whereas for Aus, it will be the "noice Watto!", gum chewing, on field confrontation starting Aussie team that will show up.
In other words, both teams will come across as thoroughly arrogant and unlikeable.
Unless you're talking about performances?
Henry- Number of posts : 32891
Reputation : 100
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Guest Thu 13 Oct 2011, 09:35
Ind v Eng: T20 - 1-0 Eng; ODIs - 4-1 Ind
SA v Aus: T20 - 1-1; ODIs - 2-1 Aus; Tests - 1-0 SA
Pak v SL: Tests - 1-1 ; ODIs - 3-2 PAK; T20 - 1-0 SL
Zim v NZ: T20 - 2-0 NZ; ODIs - 2-1 NZ; Test - 1-0 NZ
Ban v WI - ODIs - 2-1 WI; Tests - 2-0 WI
SA v Aus: T20 - 1-1; ODIs - 2-1 Aus; Tests - 1-0 SA
Pak v SL: Tests - 1-1 ; ODIs - 3-2 PAK; T20 - 1-0 SL
Zim v NZ: T20 - 2-0 NZ; ODIs - 2-1 NZ; Test - 1-0 NZ
Ban v WI - ODIs - 2-1 WI; Tests - 2-0 WI
Guest- Guest
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Brass Monkey Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:17
Henry wrote:
Hardly. We all know that for South Africa, the "ooooohhhh yaaaarrrr Daylo!", 'school girl screams when we take a wicket' team will turn up, whereas for Aus, it will be the "noice Watto!", gum chewing, on field confrontation starting Aussie team that will show up.
In other words, both teams will come across as thoroughly arrogant and unlikeable.
Unless you're talking about performances?
Heck yeah, I meant performances. This is the contest for the biggest dry-f*cking wicket celebration, I know they'll all be walking round cupping their balls like Jacko.
Brass Monkey- Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : -
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by JKLever Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:19
Brass Monkey wrote:Blimey, Lever has some faith in the disarrayed Banglas. I reckon the WI attack will be too much for them, not the batsmen obviously.
If they aren't roads and turn a bit I can see the Bangles winning. Doesn't Chris Gayle have more important sh!t like the Under 15 Beach T20 comp or something?
JKLever- Number of posts : 27236
Reputation : 153
Registration date : 2007-08-06
Flag/Background :
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Guest Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:21
I thought India were the kings of "screaming like schoolgirls when we take a wicket".
*clears throat*
But of course, we didn't really see that during the England tour!
*clears throat*
But of course, we didn't really see that during the England tour!
Guest- Guest
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by taipan Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:22
Brass Monkey wrote:Henry wrote:
Hardly. We all know that for South Africa, the "ooooohhhh yaaaarrrr Daylo!", 'school girl screams when we take a wicket' team will turn up, whereas for Aus, it will be the "noice Watto!", gum chewing, on field confrontation starting Aussie team that will show up.
In other words, both teams will come across as thoroughly arrogant and unlikeable.
Unless you're talking about performances?
Heck yeah, I meant performances. This is the contest for the biggest dry-f*cking wicket celebration, I know they'll all be walking round cupping their balls like Jacko.
Fark me. And this is from the home of Stuart Broad.
taipan
- Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Brass Monkey Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:30
JKLever wrote:
If they aren't roads and turn a bit I can see the Bangles winning. Doesn't Chris Gayle have more important sh!t like the Under 15 Beach T20 comp or something?
Think he's selling tickets to people so they can spend time shaving and sh!tting with him.
Brass Monkey- Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : -
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Brass Monkey Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:32
taipan wrote:
Fark me. And this is from the home of Stuart Broad.
Yeah, they politely tickle his balls. Not the all out c*ck on c*ck frotting your boys seem determined to beat Aus at.
Brass Monkey- Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : -
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by taipan Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:33
Brass Monkey wrote:taipan wrote:
Fark me. And this is from the home of Stuart Broad.
Yeah, they politely tickle his balls. Not the all out c*ck on c*ck frotting your boys seem determined to beat Aus at.
You mean like the "sprinkler"?
taipan- Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Henry Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:34
Brass Monkey wrote:JKLever wrote:
If they aren't roads and turn a bit I can see the Bangles winning. Doesn't Chris Gayle have more important sh!t like the Under 15 Beach T20 comp or something?
Think he's selling tickets to people so they can spend time shaving and sh!tting with him.
To be fair to Gayle, he has said he is available to play for the Windies. It's just that the WICB refuses to pick him.
Henry- Number of posts : 32891
Reputation : 100
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Brass Monkey Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:37
taipan wrote:
You mean like the "sprinkler"?
Well not really. That's just mincing idiocy. It's not: "if there was no TV cameras I'd be f*cking the side of your mouth right now"
Brass Monkey- Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : -
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by taipan Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:38
Brass Monkey wrote:taipan wrote:
You mean like the "sprinkler"?
Well not really. That's just mincing idiocy. It's not: "if there was no TV cameras I'd be f*cking the side of your mouth right now"
So you are invoking the poo defence.
taipan- Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Brass Monkey Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:38
Henry wrote:
To be fair to Gayle, he has said he is available to play for the Windies. It's just that the WICB refuses to pick him.
Aye I've seen the girly dispute. I was on his side at one time. I dunno... I just don't believe him anymore.
Brass Monkey- Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : -
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Brass Monkey Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:39
taipan wrote:
So you are invoking the poo defence.
Hmmmmmm, not really. I don't think. Have I mentioned poo today?
Brass Monkey- Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : -
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Guest Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:41
Kind of.Brass Monkey wrote:taipan wrote:
So you are invoking the poo defence.
Hmmmmmm, not really. I don't think. Have I mentioned poo today?
Brass Monkey wrote: "A chrome dome is when you spraypaint your c*ck silver, and you find yourself a nice hot grandmother with no hair and you ****** her ass until she loses control of her bowel. then she sucks your c*ck."
Guest- Guest
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by taipan Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:41
Brass Monkey wrote:taipan wrote:
So you are invoking the poo defence.
Hmmmmmm, not really. I don't think. Have I mentioned poo today?
Probably. Somewhere.
taipan- Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Brass Monkey Thu 13 Oct 2011, 10:47
Cricketers cannot be chrome domed. It's against chromedoming policy. NATO would get involved.
Brass Monkey- Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : -
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Brass Monkey Tue 18 Oct 2011, 14:19
Brass Monkey wrote:
Ind v Eng: T20 - 1-0 Eng; ODIs - 3-1 Ind
SA v Aus: T20 - 1-1; ODIs - 2-1 Aus; Tests - 1-0 SA
Pak v SL: Tests - 1-0 SL; ODIs - 3-2 SL; T20 - 1-0 Pak
Zim v NZ: T20 - 2-0 NZ; ODIs - 2-1 NZ; Test - 0-0
Ban v WI - ODIs - 2-1 WI; Tests - 1-1
JKLever wrote:
Ind v Eng: T20 - 1-0 Ind; ODIs - 4-1 Ind (if we're lucky)
SA v Aus: T20 - 1-1; ODIs - 2-1 SA; Tests - 1-1
Pak v SL: Tests - 1-1 SL; ODIs - 3-2 SL; T20 - 1-0 SL
Zim v NZ: T20 - 2-0 NZ; ODIs - 3-0 NZ; Test - 1-0
Ban v WI - ODIs - 2-1 Ban; Tests - 2-0 BAN
Henry wrote:
Ind v Eng - T20- India, ODIs-3-2- England
SA v Aus - T20s-1-1, ODIs- 2-1-RSA, Tests- 1-1
Pak v SL - Tests-1-0-Pak, ODIs- 3-2- SL, T20- Pak
Zim v NZ - T20s- 1-1, ODIs- 3-0-NZ, Test- Draw
Ban v WI - ODIs- 2-1-WI, Tests- 1-0-WI
vilkrang wrote:
Ind v Eng: T20 - 1-0 Eng; ODIs - 4-1 Ind
SA v Aus: T20 - 1-1; ODIs - 2-1 Aus; Tests - 1-0 SA
Pak v SL: Tests - 1-1 ; ODIs - 3-2 PAK; T20 - 1-0 SL
Zim v NZ: T20 - 2-0 NZ; ODIs - 2-1 NZ; Test - 1-0 NZ
Ban v WI - ODIs - 2-1 WI; Tests - 2-0 WI
Brass Monkey- Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : -
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Henry Tue 18 Oct 2011, 14:34
Hmm. England will need the comeback of all comebacks to fulfill my prediction of a series win...
Henry- Number of posts : 32891
Reputation : 100
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
PeterCS
- Number of posts : 43743
Reputation : 104
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Flag/Background :
Re: Cricket is BACK baby!
by Brass Monkey Tue 18 Oct 2011, 14:39
I thought that there'd have been a rained off match already, so my prediction's f*cked. Still, the way we're going, any of us will be lucky to get the prediction as India would've whomped us.
Brass Monkey- Number of posts : 44858
Age : 115
Reputation : 415
Registration date : 2007-09-02
Flag/Background : -
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics» A wacky cricket celebrity baby name...
» Is Fat back in fashion in Cricket?
» Brian Lara is back playing first class cricket
» Shane Bond might be coming back to international cricket
» Illingworth & Fletcher set English cricket back 10 years
» Is Fat back in fashion in Cricket?
» Brian Lara is back playing first class cricket
» Shane Bond might be coming back to international cricket
» Illingworth & Fletcher set English cricket back 10 years
Page 1 of 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|
» Formula One World Championship
» AFL 2024
» Celebrity Death List MMXXIV/The Death Thread 2024
» The Football (soccer) thread
» Rugby League 2024
» T20 World Cup
» Jesus, this place is dead...
» English Domestic Season 2024