Flaming Bails
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

+24
Ross
noelene
furriner
embee
Zat
horace
Mick Sawyer
PearlJ
Brass Monkey
Basil
WideWally
please don't yell
Fred Nerk
JKLever
holcs
Lara Lara Laughs
Henry Nolonga
taipan
THICKEDGE
skully
JGK
tac
Invader Zim
Red
28 posters

Page 1 of 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by Red Thu 13 Dec 2007, 08:32

http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,22919504-23212,00.html
Red
Red


Number of posts : 17071
Reputation : 17
Registration date : 2007-10-28
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by Invader Zim Thu 13 Dec 2007, 08:32

Well I'm torn now between agreeing with them or calling them sooks.
Invader Zim
Invader Zim


Number of posts : 6396
Reputation : 51
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : none

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by tac Thu 13 Dec 2007, 08:44

It's a tough one. If he chucks, ban him . . . but not til after he makes a few kiwis and subis jump this summer.
tac
tac


Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : pon

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by JGK Thu 13 Dec 2007, 08:55

Can't imagine that the kiwi top order batsmen will be thrilled about this.

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by skully Thu 13 Dec 2007, 08:57

Fark me, he chucks far less than Murali, so by definition he's not a chucker. Has anyone been watching the current Test as Chuck pings with impugnity? Half hour ago he came in and almost dropped the ball just as his arm reached his ear. The elbow was at 90 degrees FFS as he pulled out of the delivery. Farkin makes me sick.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105888
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by Invader Zim Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:00

Aye, saw that.

But we all know [sings]to subis, the rules do not apply[/sings]...
Invader Zim
Invader Zim


Number of posts : 6396
Reputation : 51
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : none

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by THICKEDGE Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:03

As Michael Holding says "there are a lot of one way streets in Australia"
THICKEDGE
THICKEDGE


Number of posts : 434
Reputation : 0
Registration date : 2007-09-08
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by tac Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:03

skully wrote:Fark me, he chucks far less than Murali, so by definition he's not a chucker. Has anyone been watching the current Test as Chuck pings with impugnity? Half hour ago he came in and almost dropped the ball just as his arm reached his ear. The elbow was at 90 degrees FFS as he pulled out of the delivery. Farkin makes me sick.

He pinged it pretty well in Oz, but do you think he might actually have been holding back for fear of abuse? He is twice as open about it now he's back in SL.
tac
tac


Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : pon

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by Invader Zim Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:05

THICKEDGE wrote:As Michael Holding says "there are a lot of one way streets in Australia"
Thanks, but some context would be nice.
Invader Zim
Invader Zim


Number of posts : 6396
Reputation : 51
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : none

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by skully Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:07

THICKEDGE wrote:As Michael Holding says "there are a lot of one way streets in Australia"
Happy for Tait to be called if the rule is applied uniformily across all countries and players. But we know that is not going to happen.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105888
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by taipan Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:11

skully wrote:
THICKEDGE wrote:As Michael Holding says "there are a lot of one way streets in Australia"
Happy for Tait to be called if the rule is applied uniformily across all countries and players. But we know that is not going to happen.

it is, Johan Botha got nailed, remember.
taipan
taipan


Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : saf

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by tac Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:13

But he really pinged it . . . (and he's white) . . .
tac
tac


Number of posts : 19270
Reputation : 24
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : pon

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by JGK Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:14

taipan wrote:
skully wrote:
THICKEDGE wrote:As Michael Holding says "there are a lot of one way streets in Australia"
Happy for Tait to be called if the rule is applied uniformily across all countries and players. But we know that is not going to happen.

it is, Johan Botha got nailed, remember.



And rightly so - he was worse than CBER.

JGK


Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : jnt

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by skully Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:15

taipan wrote:
skully wrote:
THICKEDGE wrote:As Michael Holding says "there are a lot of one way streets in Australia"
Happy for Tait to be called if the rule is applied uniformily across all countries and players. But we know that is not going to happen.

it is, Johan Botha got nailed, remember.
And he still does, judging by his efforts in the recent ODI series v Snoozers. I doubt he'll ever get summoned for remedial action again because the Chuck situation has made it a free for all.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105888
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by skully Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:16

JGK wrote:
taipan wrote:
skully wrote:
THICKEDGE wrote:As Michael Holding says "there are a lot of one way streets in Australia"
Happy for Tait to be called if the rule is applied uniformily across all countries and players. But we know that is not going to happen.

it is, Johan Botha got nailed, remember.



And rightly so - he was worse than CBER.
WTF??? No Kanute chucks worse than Mumu.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105888
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by Henry Nolonga Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:33

tac wrote:But he really pinged it . . . (and he's wshite) . . .

Fixed.

Oh and does anyone have any screencaps of Murali chucking it? I haven't seen any of the test matches mainly because i've been at work but i heard that quite a few times people could tell that he was chucking.
Henry Nolonga
Henry Nolonga


Number of posts : 1639
Reputation : 7
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : none

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by Lara Lara Laughs Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:40

CHUUUUUCK, Chuck, Chuck, Chuck, Chuck, Chuck, CHUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCKK!


BGARK!!
Lara Lara Laughs
Lara Lara Laughs


Number of posts : 8943
Reputation : 17
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by skully Thu 13 Dec 2007, 09:46

Henry Nolonga wrote:
tac wrote:But he really pinged it . . . (and he's wshite) . . .

Fixed.

Oh and does anyone have any screencaps of Murali chucking it? I haven't seen any of the test matches mainly because i've been at work but i heard that quite a few times people could tell that he was chucking.
Farkin every ball.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105888
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by holcs Thu 13 Dec 2007, 10:00

I saw a snap of Ahktar the other day, and jeez, that was horrific, his arm was bent (the opposite to his hyperextension excuse).

Add that to his hyperextension and he's better than a baseball pitcher!!!
holcs
holcs


Number of posts : 5481
Age : 44
Reputation : 3
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by skully Thu 13 Dec 2007, 11:01

Need I say - it's a frickin blight on the game. All through p!ss poor inaction by the ICC 10 years ago after Big D pulled the trigger.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105888
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by holcs Thu 13 Dec 2007, 11:09

Aye. Although I would say the ICC did take action. They changed one of the fundamental rules of cricket!!!!
holcs
holcs


Number of posts : 5481
Age : 44
Reputation : 3
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by skully Thu 13 Dec 2007, 11:11

Yeah, quite unbelievable actually. Years and years of navel gazing on many topics then they make the biggest fundamental change to the game since they added an extra stump - just to bring Chuck within the Rules. Farkin disgraceful.
skully
skully


Number of posts : 105888
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : baggy

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by holcs Thu 13 Dec 2007, 11:14

Yup yup and yup....

What would have been easier is to just bring in a bit of kit that had to be worn when bowling, a brace of some description that kept the arm straight!!!

Then see how well these people bowl!

Anyway, not alot can be done now. Bugs the shoite out of me, but we have to live with it!
holcs
holcs


Number of posts : 5481
Age : 44
Reputation : 3
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by taipan Thu 13 Dec 2007, 11:18

holcs wrote:Yup yup and yup....

What would have been easier is to just bring in a bit of kit that had to be worn when bowling, a brace of some description that kept the arm straight!!!


Griffen did a test with a plaster cast on. The sods still banned him
taipan
taipan


Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : saf

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by holcs Thu 13 Dec 2007, 11:21

taipan wrote:
holcs wrote:Yup yup and yup....

What would have been easier is to just bring in a bit of kit that had to be worn when bowling, a brace of some description that kept the arm straight!!!


Griffen did a test with a plaster cast on. The sods still banned him

Nice!
holcs
holcs


Number of posts : 5481
Age : 44
Reputation : 3
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Tait's action questioned by New Zealand Empty Re: Tait's action questioned by New Zealand

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum