England v South Africa, 2nd Test , Leeds, 18-22 July

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:Filth? That's what you get up to on the old webcam. But it wasn't what Monty was bowling.

Yep, he never scored did he?

That's why you feel close to him?

Hmmm, perhaps you should try to make sense with your insults.

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:Hmmm, perhaps you should try to make sense with your insults.

Yep the imaginary girlfriend will be impressed with that.

How many years do you still intend sponging off the British taxpayer, pretending to be a student?

Oh dear. It gets worse.

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:Oh dear. It gets worse.

Yep, you arrived on C4 five years ago, pretending to be a student.

So what gives?

5 years ago? About half that actually. Get back to cybersex. It's what you're good at.

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:5 years ago? About half that actually. Get back to cybersex. It's what you're good at.

Good cos you are good at fark all, you useless qunt

Can't you just start a thread for all your feuds, LLL? I'm sick of clicking on this thread under the mistaken impression that someone is about to provide an eloquent, informative snippet about the forthcoming game.

Augustus wrote:Can't you just start a thread for all your feuds, LLL? I'm sick of clicking on this thread under the mistaken impression that someone is about to provide an eloquent, informative snippet about the forthcoming game.

Sage

Augustus wrote:Can't you just start a thread for all your feuds, LLL? I'm sick of clicking on this thread under the mistaken impression that someone is about to provide an eloquent, informative snippet about the forthcoming game.

Que? All my feuds. Synopsis - taipan said something only a simpleton would say (Monty bowled filth), I pointed out that only a simpleton would say it. He then tried to insult me with some stuff that made little sense. I pitied the fool.

Lara Lara Laughs wrote: Synopsis - taipan said something only a simpleton would say (Monty bowled filth), I pointed out that only a simpleton would say it.

60 overs for how many?

Augustus wrote:Can't you just start a thread for all your feuds, LLL? I'm sick of clicking on this thread under the mistaken impression that someone is about to provide an eloquent, informative snippet about the forthcoming game.

You might take yourselves a little less seriously you know. Or read Wisden for 'eloquent, informative snippet(s)'.

still i think the redoubtable Augie has made a good point...personally I am looking forward to this test. which i think will tell us a bit more about both sides.

horace wrote:still i think the redoubtable Augie has made a good point...personally I am looking forward to this test. which i think will tell us a bit more about both sides.

Don't need another Test to tell us more about each team.

Jaarpiss will be all the wiser for Lord's.
Will bowl less filth and bat as they did second dig.

England have never repeated the dose after doing it once (ie., scoring big first innings to make the game safe).
Not for a long long time ... and not against decent oppos.

All that changes and becomes a lottery if it's a green top!

McKenzie is doubtful for the 2nd Test. They say the groin strain is not serious, but that the short time between the Tests means that he doesn't have much time to recover, so young JP Duminy could make his debut. I, for one, will be very excited should that happen, even though he will be making his debut as an opener. He is a truly exquisite batsman to watch, someone who can make batting look ridiculously easy.

My nipples are erect once more.

taipan wrote:

60 overs for how many?

For less than 2 an over. An econ a SA spinner would kill for.

Quality really - you were paying tribute to some 'amazing batting' by 'f*cking amazing South Africa' and then you're calling the bowling gash.

Make your mind up champ - you've lost the plot a little.

bliksem wrote:...so young JP Duminy could make his debut. I, for one, will be very excited should that happen, even though he will be making his debut as an opener. He is a truly exquisite batsman to watch, someone who can make batting look ridiculously easy.

Totally agree. He looks all class.

bliksem wrote:

My nipples are erect once more.

Will that cause uneven bounce on the first day?

Only if I lie face down on the pitch.

Flintoff is definitely playing but big doubt for Sidebottom.

Flintoff for Sidders then...

Does that strengthen the batting?

Tremlett is called up for Sidebottom.

Flintoff is batting at 7
Still not ruling Sidebottom out.

Demelza wrote:Flintoff is batting at 7
Still not ruling Sidebottom out.

Where does it state that he will bat 7?

Flintoff back for England
From correspondents in Leeds, England
July 17, 2008
ANDREW Flintoff will play his first Test for 18 months after England captain Michael Vaughan confirmed the all-rounder has been named in the team to play South Africa in the second Test, starting at Headingley on Friday.

A combination of ankle and side injuries have ruled Flintoff out of Test cricket since captaining the side during a defeat against Australia at Sydney in January 2007 which saw England lose the Ashes 5-0.

England have fielded the same team for a world record six successive Tests. But although Vaughan said Flintoff would bat at No 7, he did not reveal who he would replace in the side that drew the first Test at Lord's.

Vaughan said left-arm quick Ryan Sidebottom was still struggling with the back strain that hampered him at Lord's and that, as a consequence, England would not name their side until the morning of the match in order to give the Nottinghamshire seamer time to prove his fitness.

England have added Hampshire seamer Chris Tremlett to their 12-man squad as a cover for Sidebottom.

Agence France-Presse