UK politics thread
+29
Ethics? The Gall!
WideWally
Red
Henry
Aditya
tricycle
PeterCS
Neil D
buckSH
Bradman
MoH
LeFromage
horace
beamer
Growler
Big Dog
Basil
skully
G.Wood
lardbucket
Brass Monkey
JGK
embee
bodyline
eowyn
Merlin
taipan
JKLever
Allan D
33 posters
Page 15 of 40
Page 15 of 40 • 1 ... 9 ... 14, 15, 16 ... 27 ... 40
Re: UK politics thread
And can you imagine how Putin will be salivating over the prospect of regaining the likes of Estonia, Latvia & Lithuania??
This is truly farked up the arse.
This is truly farked up the arse.
skully- Number of posts : 105931
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
I'm trying to think of a worse event in British history:
Suez?
Singapore?
In the end, these came right (well, sort of) but nothing is going to save us now.
Suez?
Singapore?
In the end, these came right (well, sort of) but nothing is going to save us now.
Basil- Number of posts : 15936
Age : 65
Reputation : 72
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
Dunkirk, Basil.
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38088
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
lardbucket wrote:Dunkirk, Basil.
If you measure Dunkirk in terms of the materiel we left behind then it was an unmitigated disaster, but in terms of the men rescued, it was a victory of sorts - guns can't fire themselves. That's why I didn't measure it.
Last edited by Basil on Sat 25 Jun 2016, 14:58; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : pedantry)
Basil- Number of posts : 15936
Age : 65
Reputation : 72
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
skully wrote:Watched "London has fallen" this arvo on DVD. Seemed apt.
Good movie, BTW.
Hey, i watched it yesterday arvo too.
Re: UK politics thread
skully wrote:Dumb qunts given the right to make seismic changes to the way important World business is done. Unbelievable.
My lady's father asked "how come they didn't put a threshold on the vote?" e.g. at least 55% has to vote for "Leave" before it could be ratified, to account for cranky old qunts & bovver boys. I said "good question". I think Cameron farked up deluxe.
Indeed. Under Australian referendum rules it probably doesn't get up because only 2 of the 4 "provinces" voted Leave and if you consider that London is separate from the rest of England, only 2 of 5.
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
Aye, ridiculouslessly loose referendum rules, given the consequences. Cameron asleep at the wheel.
skully- Number of posts : 105931
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
Ridiculouslessly? What? Mekong fused.
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38088
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
Early morning "pick me up" gone too far perhaps?
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
I wonder if Brits are waking up this morning, looked left, looked right and realised they've spent the night in the Farage - Boris sandwich.
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
More spit roast than sandwich ...
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38088
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
Interesting take on it all by a commenter on the Graun...
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2016/jun/25/brexit-live-emergency-meetings-eu-uk-leave-vote#comment-77205935
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2016/jun/25/brexit-live-emergency-meetings-eu-uk-leave-vote#comment-77205935
- Spoiler:
If Boris Johnson looked downbeat yesterday, that is because he realises that he has lost.
Perhaps many Brexiters do not realise it yet, but they have actually lost, and it is all down to one man: David Cameron.
With one fell swoop yesterday at 9:15 am, Cameron effectively annulled the referendum result, and simultaneously destroyed the political careers of Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and leading Brexiters who cost him so much anguish, not to mention his premiership.
How?
Throughout the campaign, Cameron had repeatedly said that a vote for leave would lead to triggering Article 50 straight away. Whether implicitly or explicitly, the image was clear: he would be giving that notice under Article 50 the morning after a vote to leave. Whether that was scaremongering or not is a bit moot now but, in the midst of the sentimental nautical references of his speech yesterday, he quietly abandoned that position and handed the responsibility over to his successor.
And as the day wore on, the enormity of that step started to sink in: the markets, Sterling, Scotland, the Irish border, the Gibraltar border, the frontier at Calais, the need to continue compliance with all EU regulations for a free market, re-issuing passports, Brits abroad, EU citizens in Britain, the mountain of legistlation to be torn up and rewritten ... the list grew and grew.
The referendum result is not binding. It is advisory. Parliament is not bound to commit itself in that same direction.
The Conservative party election that Cameron triggered will now have one question looming over it: will you, if elected as party leader, trigger the notice under Article 50?
Who will want to have the responsibility of all those ramifications and consequences on his/her head and shoulders?
Boris Johnson knew this yesterday, when he emerged subdued from his home and was even more subdued at the press conference. He has been out-maneouvered and check-mated.
If he runs for leadership of the party, and then fails to follow through on triggering Article 50, then he is finished. If he does not run and effectively abandons the field, then he is finished. If he runs, wins and pulls the UK out of the EU, then it will all be over - Scotland will break away, there will be upheaval in Ireland, a recession ... broken trade agreements. Then he is also finished. Boris Johnson knows all of this. When he acts like the dumb blond it is just that: an act.
The Brexit leaders now have a result that they cannot use. For them, leadership of the Tory party has become a poison chalice.
When Boris Johnson said there was no need to trigger Article 50 straight away, what he really meant to say was "never". When Michael Gove went on and on about "informal negotiations" ... why? why not the formal ones straight away? ... he also meant not triggering the formal departure. They both know what a formal demarche would mean: an irreversible step that neither of them is prepared to take.
All that remains is for someone to have the guts to stand up and say that Brexit is unachievable in reality without an enormous amount of pain and destruction, that cannot be borne. And David Cameron has put the onus of making that statement on the heads of the people who led the Brexit campaign.
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
Hmm, very interesting. Perhaps all is not lost.
skully- Number of posts : 105931
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
One wonder if the 28% who didn't vote woke up the next morning wondering WTF!
Red- Number of posts : 17071
Reputation : 17
Registration date : 2007-10-28
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
Red wrote:One wonder if the 28% who didn't vote woke up the next morning wondering WTF!
One would think that if they didn't care enough to vote in the first place, they WGAF now.
taipan- Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
To be honest skulls even if we don't end up leaving the EU, I feel that the country is already lost.skully wrote:Hmm, very interesting. Perhaps all is not lost.
When going out and about I've been seeing it through different eyes now, since the result people are loudly and proudly telling anyone foreign looking to "go back home" in the streets.
You think it can't happen near you but I read a story of it happening just down the road from me, where there is a Polish supermarket. Saw a car with a Polish flag flying yesterday and thought "good on you mate" but then in the evening read that in my area every known Polish person has been sent threats through their letterboxes telling them to go back home "Polish scum".
It's not a nice country at the moment, I'm not sure whether it's just my eyes that have changed, it feels like a nasty, spiteful and massively divided place to live at the moment.
Have mentioned moving already and still very serious about this.
Guest- Guest
Re: UK politics thread
If you moved to Scotland you would be the foreigner.
taipan- Number of posts : 48416
Age : 123
Reputation : 115
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
I'm part Scottish and can pull off a flawless accent. They'd never suspect a thing.
Plus whenever I've visited before they have been very welcoming in every town I've been to.
Plus whenever I've visited before they have been very welcoming in every town I've been to.
Guest- Guest
Re: UK politics thread
taipan wrote:And now it is biting me in the arse. My small portfolio has dropped by over 3%.
Fark know what is happening in my pension funds.
.........small price to pay for the sundowner sodden expat...shite, Nige has the servants out lighting fireworks to celebrate a free Pomgolia.
horace- Number of posts : 42573
Age : 114
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
vilkrang wrote:To be honest skulls even if we don't end up leaving the EU, I feel that the country is already lost.skully wrote:Hmm, very interesting. Perhaps all is not lost.
When going out and about I've been seeing it through different eyes now, since the result people are loudly and proudly telling anyone foreign looking to "go back home" in the streets.
You think it can't happen near you but I read a story of it happening just down the road from me, where there is a Polish supermarket. Saw a car with a Polish flag flying yesterday and thought "good on you mate" but then in the evening read that in my area every known Polish person has been sent threats through their letterboxes telling them to go back home "Polish scum".
It's not a nice country at the moment, I'm not sure whether it's just my eyes that have changed, it feels like a nasty, spiteful and massively divided place to live at the moment.
Have mentioned moving already and still very serious about this.
Very sorry to hear it, vilks.
skully- Number of posts : 105931
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
You could do worse than move to Scotland, IMO.
You could even head out here ...
You could even head out here ...
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38088
Reputation : 173
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
Yeah. Move to Perth, you'll feel right at home.
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 65
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jun/25/view-wales-town-showered-eu-cash-votes-leave-ebbw-vale
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
Brexit leaders are walking back some of their biggest promises
June 27, 2016 - 10:37AM
After Brexit, UK gripped by profound case of denial
In the days after Britain's momentous decision to withdraw from the European Union, there has been much talk of voter's remorse. Some who voted in favour of a British exit have said they merely wanted to lodge a protest vote and hadn't expected the "leave" camp to actually win. Others said they had no idea that the implications of such a vote would be so dire.
But one of the biggest reasons for regret may end up being that promises made to "leave" voters by leading Brexit proponents are being walked back by those very leaders. On talk shows over the weekend, three of them in particular were confronted by flabbergasted hosts over their playing down of integral elements of the Brexit campaign.
Nigel Farage was perhaps the loudest voice calling for Britain's exit from the European Union, though he wasn't officially part of the "Leave" campaign. As leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party, he represented the isolationist, anti-immigration core of the Brexit movement. Speaking to the host of ITV's "Good Morning Britain," Farage called one of the "leave" campaign's biggest promises a "mistake," though he distanced himself from the decision to make the promise in the first place.
Host: "The 350 million pounds ($633 million) a week that we send to the EU, which we will no longer send to the EU, can you guarantee that's going to go to the NHS [Britain's National Health Service]?"
Farage: "No, I can't, and I would never have made that claim. It is one of the mistakes that, I think, the 'leave' campaign made."
Host: "Hold on a moment. That was one of your adverts."
They then sparred over whether it was the "leave" campaign's advertisement or Farage's in particular, before moving on. The advertisement was the campaign's, not Farage's.
Host: "That's why many people voted."
Farage: "They made a mistake doing that."
Host: "You're saying after 17 million people have voted for 'leave,' based — I don't know how many people voted on the basis of that advert, but that was a huge part of the propaganda —you're now saying that's a mistake?"
On "The Andrew Marr Show," another leading "leave" campaigner, Iain Duncan Smith, said that the £350-million figure was "an extrapolation" and that the campaign had never said that all of that money would go to the NHS, just a good portion of it. Many were quick to point out that the "leave" campaign had a bus emblazoned with the monetary figure and at least strongly implied that the money would be reallocated to the NHS. Smith is pictured below alongside the bus.
The Brexit vote was as much a referendum on Britain's immigration policies as anything else, so the promises made around that issue carried outsize weight. Immigration flows to Britain have been increasing, and levels of resentment are high among certain segments of the British public.
That explains the exasperation of a BBC Radio 5 host who was talking to "leave" campaigner Nigel Evans.
Host: "Was it not inferred that if you vote 'leave,' immigration would go down?"
Evans: "Well, we said we would control it, and that is the most important point."
Host: "Control it by bringing it down, Nigel?"
Evans: "No, but there are two differences here, and this is where there is some misunderstanding."
Evans goes on to offer some background on how the "leave" campaign's immigration promises were made, but the host cuts him off.
Host: "Straight question, straight answer, Nigel. Will immigration fall significantly when the UK leaves the EU?"
Suffice it to say that Evans does not have a straight answer.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/brexit-leaders-are-walking-back-some-of-their-biggest-promises-20160627-gpside.html#ixzz4CktCQ8DE
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook
June 27, 2016 - 10:37AM
After Brexit, UK gripped by profound case of denial
In the days after Britain's momentous decision to withdraw from the European Union, there has been much talk of voter's remorse. Some who voted in favour of a British exit have said they merely wanted to lodge a protest vote and hadn't expected the "leave" camp to actually win. Others said they had no idea that the implications of such a vote would be so dire.
But one of the biggest reasons for regret may end up being that promises made to "leave" voters by leading Brexit proponents are being walked back by those very leaders. On talk shows over the weekend, three of them in particular were confronted by flabbergasted hosts over their playing down of integral elements of the Brexit campaign.
Nigel Farage was perhaps the loudest voice calling for Britain's exit from the European Union, though he wasn't officially part of the "Leave" campaign. As leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party, he represented the isolationist, anti-immigration core of the Brexit movement. Speaking to the host of ITV's "Good Morning Britain," Farage called one of the "leave" campaign's biggest promises a "mistake," though he distanced himself from the decision to make the promise in the first place.
Host: "The 350 million pounds ($633 million) a week that we send to the EU, which we will no longer send to the EU, can you guarantee that's going to go to the NHS [Britain's National Health Service]?"
Farage: "No, I can't, and I would never have made that claim. It is one of the mistakes that, I think, the 'leave' campaign made."
Host: "Hold on a moment. That was one of your adverts."
They then sparred over whether it was the "leave" campaign's advertisement or Farage's in particular, before moving on. The advertisement was the campaign's, not Farage's.
Host: "That's why many people voted."
Farage: "They made a mistake doing that."
Host: "You're saying after 17 million people have voted for 'leave,' based — I don't know how many people voted on the basis of that advert, but that was a huge part of the propaganda —you're now saying that's a mistake?"
On "The Andrew Marr Show," another leading "leave" campaigner, Iain Duncan Smith, said that the £350-million figure was "an extrapolation" and that the campaign had never said that all of that money would go to the NHS, just a good portion of it. Many were quick to point out that the "leave" campaign had a bus emblazoned with the monetary figure and at least strongly implied that the money would be reallocated to the NHS. Smith is pictured below alongside the bus.
The Brexit vote was as much a referendum on Britain's immigration policies as anything else, so the promises made around that issue carried outsize weight. Immigration flows to Britain have been increasing, and levels of resentment are high among certain segments of the British public.
That explains the exasperation of a BBC Radio 5 host who was talking to "leave" campaigner Nigel Evans.
Host: "Was it not inferred that if you vote 'leave,' immigration would go down?"
Evans: "Well, we said we would control it, and that is the most important point."
Host: "Control it by bringing it down, Nigel?"
Evans: "No, but there are two differences here, and this is where there is some misunderstanding."
Evans goes on to offer some background on how the "leave" campaign's immigration promises were made, but the host cuts him off.
Host: "Straight question, straight answer, Nigel. Will immigration fall significantly when the UK leaves the EU?"
Suffice it to say that Evans does not have a straight answer.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/brexit-leaders-are-walking-back-some-of-their-biggest-promises-20160627-gpside.html#ixzz4CktCQ8DE
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: UK politics thread
Deary me, what a cluster fark!!
skully- Number of posts : 105931
Age : 112
Reputation : 246
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Page 15 of 40 • 1 ... 9 ... 14, 15, 16 ... 27 ... 40
Similar topics
» UK politics thread
» the Geo-Politics thread
» UK politics thread (II)
» Aus Federal Politics thread (XI)
» Aus Federal Politics thread (II)
» the Geo-Politics thread
» UK politics thread (II)
» Aus Federal Politics thread (XI)
» Aus Federal Politics thread (II)
Page 15 of 40
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Today at 11:29 by embee
» *The United States Presidential Election * (III)
Today at 03:13 by skully
» T20 World Cup
Yesterday at 23:57 by skully
» Is this such a bad test match record?
Yesterday at 22:15 by lardbucket
» Rugby League 2024
Yesterday at 14:32 by skully
» Express postage
Yesterday at 14:30 by skully
» Formula One World Championship
Yesterday at 13:48 by lardbucket
» Jesus, this place is dead...
Yesterday at 09:20 by skully
» In other news ....
Mon 06 May 2024, 22:06 by skully