Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
+17
Leo
WideWally
Zat
Hass
G.Wood
lardbucket
Mick Sawyer
horace
Invader Zim
Bradman
bodyline
skully
embee
Paul Keating
JGK
Big Dog
taipan
21 posters
Page 37 of 40
Page 37 of 40 • 1 ... 20 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
G.Wood wrote:Big Dog wrote:G.Wood wrote:I can't believe that nobody has come out and said how abhorrent it is that the clubs think that it is their right to be able to continue to profit from the misery of these poor farkers
I should have worn a hat
Its up the the "poor farkers" to take responsibility for their own actions. Wilkie is meddling in area's that should'nt concern the Government. Just another example of Big Brother, Nanny State politics that is slowly removing our freedom of choice.
err that is what the legislation is designed to allow.
They get to set their limit when they are relatively sane, and not rely on making decisions after they have become hypnotised by the evil things
No, its about penalising the majority for the sake of the few. The majority of responsible gamblers shouldn't have to be subjected to this farcical contrivance which won't work anyway as it will just force the problem gamblers to other forms of unrestricted gambling. Quite frankly its none of the Governments damn business how much i, or anyone else, choses to gamble.
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
HTF does it penalise the majority? If you want put a lazy 20 through you don't need a card. if you want to play big you just set yourself a $6 million limit.
G.Wood- Number of posts : 12070
Reputation : 99
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
G.Wood wrote:HTF does it penalise the majority? If you want put a lazy 20 through you don't need a card. if you want to play big you just set yourself a $6 million limit.
The fact is that a great many of the responsible casual gamblers will just not bother playing anymore. This is where the jobs will be lost & club revenues will suffer and as it will do little to solve the problem, the whole thing is a sham.
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
Casual gamblers don't need a card
G.Wood- Number of posts : 12070
Reputation : 99
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
G.Wood wrote:Casual gamblers don't need a card
Doesn't matter, it depends on what you can afford to wager. The point i am trying to make is that it isn't the Governments responsibility anyway. This is just old fashioned extreme left wing politics where the Government wants to control every aspect of peoples lives & they do it under the guise of social reform. Its time people started to take responsibility for their lives & stop relying on the Government to make decisions for them.
Wilkie is a one trick pony who, without doubt, will get booted out at the next election. It would be a shame to see an entire industry destroyed because of a one term wonder.
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
blow up the pokies
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38844
Reputation : 174
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
WA doesn't have pokies and its' clubs seem to do OK.
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
A letter to the editor in today's SMH was comparing the nanny state of government's limiting gambling and that of the policy to sell half strength beer at sporting events.
Is that acting like Big Brother too? Let's blame Gillard for that monstrosity of a blunder regarding the half strength beer. Which by the way doesn't seem to have decreased patronage or ticket sales to sporting events.
Is that acting like Big Brother too? Let's blame Gillard for that monstrosity of a blunder regarding the half strength beer. Which by the way doesn't seem to have decreased patronage or ticket sales to sporting events.
Paul Keating- Number of posts : 4663
Reputation : 8
Registration date : 2007-10-25
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
the pokies are a blight on the environment, and should be banned for that, if not to save their hopelessly addicted patrons
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38844
Reputation : 174
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
It's just like random breath testing. It is an inconvenience for those who aren't stupid enough to drink and drive. Of course we pay for RBT in our taxes...Big Dog wrote:G.Wood wrote:Big Dog wrote:G.Wood wrote:I can't believe that nobody has come out and said how abhorrent it is that the clubs think that it is their right to be able to continue to profit from the misery of these poor farkers
I should have worn a hat
Its up the the "poor farkers" to take responsibility for their own actions. Wilkie is meddling in area's that should'nt concern the Government. Just another example of Big Brother, Nanny State politics that is slowly removing our freedom of choice.
err that is what the legislation is designed to allow.
They get to set their limit when they are relatively sane, and not rely on making decisions after they have become hypnotised by the evil things
No, its about penalising the majority for the sake of the few. The majority of responsible gamblers shouldn't have to be subjected to this farcical contrivance which won't work anyway as it will just force the problem gamblers to other forms of unrestricted gambling. Quite frankly its none of the Governments damn business how much i, or anyone else, choses to gamble.
Zat- Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
Actually, the opposition to the Wilkie scheme, and the statements being made about it are remarkably similar to the opposition to the introduction of RBT way back when.
Zat- Number of posts : 28872
Reputation : 86
Registration date : 2007-09-04
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
Craig Thomson in more trouble ... must be causing Julia's hair to fall out. Maybe her pubes, too.
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38844
Reputation : 174
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
Everything has restrictions on it. Except parenthood. Gambling on pokies (well it's not actually gambling) is way too easy. If you want to gamble learn poker or how to read a formsheet.
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 66
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
Bradman wrote:Everything has restrictions on it. Except parenthood. Gambling on pokies (well it's not actually gambling) is way too easy. If you want to gamble learn poker or how to read a formsheet.
and that is the one thing we should restrict...tax families with 2 or more kids...ban IVF for first mothers past 35
..
horace- Number of posts : 42595
Age : 115
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
Amen brother!
Bradman- Number of posts : 17402
Age : 66
Reputation : 35
Registration date : 2008-08-13
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
no wuzzes comrade
horace- Number of posts : 42595
Age : 115
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
So this 3 day gab-fest on tax reform and jobs - I guess it will achieve as much as the Vulture's govt has i.e. fark all at great expense.
And that Oakeschott is a complete arseclown and a dopey flip to boot. Can't wait to see my home town Fed seat wipe the floor with his arse at the next Election.
And that Oakeschott is a complete arseclown and a dopey flip to boot. Can't wait to see my home town Fed seat wipe the floor with his arse at the next Election.
skully- Number of posts : 106779
Age : 113
Reputation : 247
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
horace wrote:Bradman wrote:Everything has restrictions on it. Except parenthood. Gambling on pokies (well it's not actually gambling) is way too easy. If you want to gamble learn poker or how to read a formsheet.
and that is the one thing we should restrict...tax families with 2 or more kids...ban IVF for first mothers past 35
..
these days most families with 2 or more kids are receiving benefits, not paying tax
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38844
Reputation : 174
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
skully wrote:So this 3 day gab-fest on tax reform and jobs - I guess it will achieve as much as the Vulture's govt has i.e. fark all at great expense.
And that Oakeschott is a complete arseclown and a dopey flip to boot. Can't wait to see my home town Fed seat wipe the floor with his arse at the next Election.
Actually many in the press are seeing it as a worthwhile exercise given that most of the speaking was done by people who know what they are talking about. It might have something to do with the Opposition not being there resulting in an absence of politics poisoning the forum.
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
no debate then, just a series of oracular pontifications?
lardbucket- Number of posts : 38844
Reputation : 174
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
No. Plenty of debate as I understand it.
One observation is that some of the lobby groups had to try to justify their own selfish positions in front of people who could call their bluff - and their bluff was called.
One observation is that some of the lobby groups had to try to justify their own selfish positions in front of people who could call their bluff - and their bluff was called.
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
JGK wrote:No. Plenty of debate as I understand it.
One observation is that some of the lobby groups had to try to justify their own selfish positions in front of people who could call their bluff - and their bluff was called.
So the government have put in place a forum whereby issues are canvassed openly with accountability?
What a waste of time.
Mick Sawyer- Number of posts : 7267
Reputation : 21
Registration date : 2007-09-11
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
Mick
If they ACT on and IMPLEMENT the reforms suggested that passed scrutiny then the forum will be worthwhile .
if it's just another repeat of the 2020 Kevfest (or even the Henry Report) then it will be a waste of time
If they ACT on and IMPLEMENT the reforms suggested that passed scrutiny then the forum will be worthwhile .
if it's just another repeat of the 2020 Kevfest (or even the Henry Report) then it will be a waste of time
embee- Number of posts : 26339
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
what if they try to implement the reforms but the opposition stops them? Is it still worthwhile then?
JGK- Number of posts : 41790
Reputation : 161
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Aus Federal Politics thread (III)
That was my point. The Vulture and the Goose opened proceedings with "The Carbon Tax, Mining Tax and GST apportionment are non-negotiable - now what would you like to talk about?".embee wrote:Mick
If they ACT on and IMPLEMENT the reforms suggested that passed scrutiny then the forum will be worthwhile .
if it's just another repeat of the 2020 Kevfest (or even the Henry Report) then it will be a waste of time
There seemed general agreement that State taxes such as Stamp Duty are inefficient but if the Goose isn't gonna change the GST handouts then the States have no choice but to leave such taxes in place.
A total waste-of-time gabfest that will deliver nothing despite Farkschott's pleas for "outcomes, outcomes, outcomes, [various outcome scenarios f@rted], whatever takes your biscuit." WTF?
Last edited by skully on Thu 06 Oct 2011, 06:11; edited 1 time in total
skully- Number of posts : 106779
Age : 113
Reputation : 247
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Page 37 of 40 • 1 ... 20 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
Similar topics
» Aus Federal Politics thread (VI)
» Aus Federal Politics thread (XI)
» Aus Federal Politics thread (II)
» Aus Federal Politics thread (XV)
» Aus Federal Politics thread
» Aus Federal Politics thread (XI)
» Aus Federal Politics thread (II)
» Aus Federal Politics thread (XV)
» Aus Federal Politics thread
Page 37 of 40
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Yesterday at 23:46 by lardbucket
» Celebrity Death List MMXXIV/The Death Thread 2024
Yesterday at 21:15 by Fred Nerk
» Alan Jones gets his England cap... and #700 approaches
Yesterday at 08:10 by skully
» Australian Domestic Season 2024/25
Yesterday at 04:13 by Nath
» Upcoming Test Cricket
Mon 18 Nov 2024, 23:14 by skully
» Graeme Swann: Great All-Rounder
Mon 18 Nov 2024, 20:53 by Norfolk Ian Goode
» Current International One Day Cricket
Mon 18 Nov 2024, 10:42 by skully
» International Rugby Union Thread
Sun 17 Nov 2024, 22:37 by Norfolk Ian Goode
» Article on Pant's road to recovery from near fatal car crash
Sun 17 Nov 2024, 02:29 by Red