Aussie Revival

(I know the above statement is asking for trouble, but it just seemed SOOO long when we had to say it with the two countries inserted the other other way round.)

Good point.

Yeah, this Aussie attack (any of 5 or 6) will be able to do well in England - especially England's penchant for rabbit head lighting. Their batting looks brittle in ways, though, they have a propensity to collapse. Will be interested to see how Warner goes from here. I think it's still the right top 3 to have all-in-all though. It's miles away from the Ashes, anyway. Loads of cricket to be played.

Indeed, England have to do well in the sub-continent and at home to SA in a pathetically short 3 test series before we even think about the Ashes.

JKLever wrote:Indeed, England have to do well in the sub-continent and at home to SA in a pathetically short 3 test series before we even think about the Ashes.

......and an away series in India

All of what Daniel says is true and the ineptness of this Indian side has also exaggerated any "revival".

Still I am happy that our bowling at least is looking shed loads better than I think anyone would have predicted 12 months ago

True.

G.Wood wrote:All of what Daniel says is true and the ineptness of this Indian side has also exaggerated any "revival".

Still I am happy that our bowling at least is looking shed loads better than I think anyone would have predicted 12 months ago

Aye, at least their is some sign of life unlike the dim dark days 12 months ago.

Ashes should be a walk in the park.

OP Tipping wrote:Ashes should be a walk in the park.

Aye, if you've got a doosra bowler.