2014 CA contracted players

No Dools but yes to Marsh and Phews!

Name	Age
George Bailey	31
Michael Clarke	32
James Faulkner	23
Aaron Finch	27
Brad Haddin	36
Ryan Harris	34
Phillip Hughes	25
Mitchell Johnson	32
Nathan Lyon	26
Shaun Marsh	30
Glenn Maxwell	25
Chris Rogers	36
James Pattinson	23
Peter Siddle	29
Steve Smith	24
Mitchell Starc	24
David Warner	27
Shane Watson	32

Fink?...Clotto?...no wicket keeper!

There is NO Moises.

This can't be a serious list.

hehehe...so there is an upside

18 contracts is too many.

No contract for Bird?....I'd have him over Pattinson anyday.

Nath wrote:18 contracts is too many.

Not necessarily. There are a few SA players I would put contracts on.

No Doherty, no Ahmed, no Muirhead. So the future of Australia's spin lays with Elmer alone.........FFS  

Wade goes and Haddin is flavour of the month, just as was reported in the T20 game thread that he has reverted to Haddit. Marsh is lucky, maybe Hughes too.

Red wrote:Wade goes and Haddin is flavour of the month, just as was reported in the T20 game thread that he has reverted to Haddit. Marsh is lucky, maybe Hughes too.

The whole list is 'back to the future'. Hughes & Marsh? FFS....Haddin has'nt made a score since the Ashes. The only thing Watson has done is create new & ridiculous ways of getting out. Doolan, while not setting the world on fire, did ok. Certainly other players were given more chances than him before getting dropped.
Quite frankly the sooner Invers goes, the better.

Agree about Doolan, he may not be the ticket but it seems odd that Marsh is preferred to him, even if he occasionally plays the shorter forms when his body is right.

taipan wrote:

Nath wrote:18 contracts is too many.

Not necessarily. There are a few SA players I would put contracts on.

I meant moreso 15 main contracts, and maybe a handful of next tier.

Nath wrote:

taipan wrote:

Nath wrote:18 contracts is too many.

Not necessarily. There are a few SA players I would put contracts on.

I meant moreso 15 main contracts, and maybe a handful of next tier.

I was thinking of a different kind of contract.

taipan wrote:

Nath wrote:

taipan wrote:

Nath wrote:18 contracts is too many.

Not necessarily. There are a few SA players I would put contracts on.

I meant moreso 15 main contracts, and maybe a handful of next tier.

I was thinking of a different kind of contract.

I see   

Big Dog wrote:No contract for Bird?....I'd have him over Pattinson anyday.

Bird is injured again. Back.

Nath wrote:

taipan wrote:

Nath wrote:

taipan wrote:

Nath wrote:18 contracts is too many.

Not necessarily. There are a few SA players I would put contracts on.

I meant moreso 15 main contracts, and maybe a handful of next tier.

I was thinking of a different kind of contract.

I see   

Starting with any derivation of Peterson.