Ramps: Australian team racially abused me

embee wrote:

Batman wrote:

embee wrote: Harby's comment was Racial and he'd already been told what he said was off limits ...

In context to Sydney still unproven, my dear friend.

Only because you have an unrealistic burden of proof ....Which of the versions given by India is the truth?

Please provide links to these different versions that u speak of.

As far as I know the only version is that Bhajji did not make any racist comment.

Batman wrote:

furriner wrote:
If Kumble 'sooked' so did Symmo and Ponting.

Not at all. Punter and sooking? Never. Just ask the people at Mumbai.

Anti Custer 6/9 ...nothing wrong with that wicket ...probably worth a sook

eowyn wrote:

Rob I wrote:

JGK wrote:Not sure why they would waste their time against someone averaging 30 in tests.

As Leo will point out, Ramps averaged 42 against Australia, though.

Enjoying the fireworks?

It's OK. Not as good as the NFI inplosion.

prasad14 wrote:

embee wrote:

Batman wrote:

embee wrote: Harby's comment was Racial and he'd already been told what he said was off limits ...

In context to Sydney still unproven, my dear friend.

Only because you have an unrealistic burden of proof ....Which of the versions given by India is the truth?

Please provide links to these different versions that u speak of.

As far as I know the only version is that Bhajji did not make any racist comment.

It's in the threads ...

Kumble was asked what Harby said .....Violet replied " He said nothing"

Next version was the "Maa Ki" mishearing

embee wrote:

Batman wrote:

furriner wrote:
If Kumble 'sooked' so did Symmo and Ponting.

Not at all. Punter and sooking? Never. Just ask the people at Mumbai.

Anti Custer 6/9 ...nothing wrong with that wicket ...probably worth a sook

Ofcource its worthy when ever Aussies sook

Batman, there is the truth for ya. Aussies sook and by default its worthy for a sook but not when others do it.

Rob I wrote:

eowyn wrote:

Rob I wrote:

JGK wrote:Not sure why they would waste their time against someone averaging 30 in tests.

As Leo will point out, Ramps averaged 42 against Australia, though.

Enjoying the fireworks?

It's OK. Not as good as the NFI inplosion.

Stupid whinging trolling ****** pommy ******

embee wrote:

prasad14 wrote:

embee wrote:

Batman wrote:

embee wrote: Harby's comment was Racial and he'd already been told what he said was off limits ...

In context to Sydney still unproven, my dear friend.

Only because you have an unrealistic burden of proof ....Which of the versions given by India is the truth?

Please provide links to these different versions that u speak of.

As far as I know the only version is that Bhajji did not make any racist comment.

It's in the threads ...

Kumble was asked what Harby said .....Violet replied " He said nothing"

Next version was the "Maa Ki" mishearing

huh..

kumble said, Bhajji did not say anything racist and not he said nothing. Something was said, that was clear to the whole world. What was in contention whether the said thing was racist or not.

Please provide evidence for your different versions. Don't just say its in the threads, thats not evidence by remote chance.

I am sure u can backup u'r posts.

furriner wrote:

HH_pink wrote:Agreer.

Disagreer!

But, lets leave it at that. We have a Test to watch. And lose.

Maybe India will draw it. Who knows? Even win it? I hope Punter does not win this one. Prayer on the lips? If Indians can't win this one for pride, or even draw it, then they shouldn't be playing test cricket.

This is still going? There's a game happening boys.

embee wrote:
Only because you have an unrealistic burden of proof ....Which of the versions given by India is the truth?

Only because you have an unfair advantage of being the accuser. Then you should be able to back it with evidence. It can't come to the point where anyone can be accused of anything and the word of the accuser becomes judgement surely. This has been debated to death now friend. With so much technology available these days, something like that would have been picked up soemwhere, with so much attention to players reactions. How come the TV didn't pick anything? I Aus players 'could' pick it from a fair distance, why didn't the umpires standing close by? India has not changed to any version yet. Don't go along with page fillers that media cooks up everyday. And who would you trust buddy? Kumble or Indian media?

So let's not get down this road of thorns again and wait for what the Indian appeal results in. This debate is not required here again and again and certainly not on this thread. Can't we just stand back as well and watch the fireworks? Lets sing out Stakka Bo's single,"Here We Go Again..."

embee wrote:

prasad14 wrote:

embee wrote:

Batman wrote:

embee wrote: Harby's comment was Racial and he'd already been told what he said was off limits ...

In context to Sydney still unproven, my dear friend.

Only because you have an unrealistic burden of proof ....Which of the versions given by India is the truth?

Please provide links to these different versions that u speak of.

As far as I know the only version is that Bhajji did not make any racist comment.

It's in the threads ...

Kumble was asked what Harby said .....Violet replied " He said nothing"

Next version was the "Maa Ki" mishearing

When you're asked right after/before the hearing what Bhajji said, you probably assume it's about the racist comments. It was clear to everyone both Bhajji and Symonds were having a crack at each other.

Exactly. But no, one reads words as one pleases, doesn't one?

Why did it take so long to come out with the "your mother" line?

It's not racist ...it is highly abusive ...but would certainly be a defence to the charge

Had Symonds not informed him that he considered Monkey to be racial ...

Cue Blazing Saddles ...."The Sheriff is a near" ....

Batman wrote:

embee wrote:
Only because you have an unrealistic burden of proof ....Which of the versions given by India is the truth?

Only because you have an unfair advantage of being the accuser. Then you should be able to back it with evidence. It can't come to the point where anyone can be accused of anything and the word of the accuser becomes judgement surely. This has been debated to death now friend. With so much technology available these days, something like that would have been picked up soemwhere, with so much attention to players reactions. How come the TV didn't pick anything? I Aus players 'could' pick it from a fair distance, why didn't the umpires standing close by? India has not changed to any version yet. Don't go along with page fillers that media cooks up everyday. And who would you trust buddy? Kumble or Indian media?

So let's not get down this road of thorns again and wait for what the Indian appeal results in. This debate is not required here again and again and certainly not on this thread. Can't we just stand back as well and watch the fireworks? Lets sing out Stakka Bo's single,"Here We Go Again..."

Did you cut and paste that from one of those threads about cricket balls which tamper with themselves?

embee wrote:Anti Custer 6/9 ...nothing wrong with that wicket ...probably worth a sook

But that means you couldn't capitalize on that? A bad pitch sure. Undeniably. But with no umpiring issues and equal chances to both sides in the low scorer, surely a fair result? Then why blame the pitch? I think it was purely Punter's ego that got hurt. Gilchrist led Aus to the series win [with two wins earlier] and Punter couldn't make his only test as captain and player count. That was where I think the sook came from. He couldn't handle his failure.

embee wrote:

Batman wrote:

embee wrote:
Only because you have an unrealistic burden of proof ....Which of the versions given by India is the truth?

Only because you have an unfair advantage of being the accuser. Then you should be able to back it with evidence. It can't come to the point where anyone can be accused of anything and the word of the accuser becomes judgement surely. This has been debated to death now friend. With so much technology available these days, something like that would have been picked up soemwhere, with so much attention to players reactions. How come the TV didn't pick anything? I Aus players 'could' pick it from a fair distance, why didn't the umpires standing close by? India has not changed to any version yet. Don't go along with page fillers that media cooks up everyday. And who would you trust buddy? Kumble or Indian media?

So let's not get down this road of thorns again and wait for what the Indian appeal results in. This debate is not required here again and again and certainly not on this thread. Can't we just stand back as well and watch the fireworks? Lets sing out Stakka Bo's single,"Here We Go Again..."

Did you cut and paste that from one of those threads about cricket balls which tamper with themselves?

If thats what you choose to believe, than perhaps I did.

embee wrote:Why did it take so long to come out with the "your mother" line?

It's not racist ...it is highly abusive ...but would certainly be a defence to the charge

Had Symonds not informed him that he considered Monkey to be racial ...

Cue Blazing Saddles ...."The Sheriff is a near" ....

Hear the song friend, hear the song....Here We Go Again.

This whole forum has been down this road enough. You are neither proving anything more here nor achieving anything with it This thread is fast moving away from Ramps to Bhajji. Get back to Ramps and leave Bhajji for BCCI and ICC.

Batman wrote:

embee wrote:Why did it take so long to come out with the "your mother" line?

It's not racist ...it is highly abusive ...but would certainly be a defence to the charge

Had Symonds not informed him that he considered Monkey to be racial ...

Cue Blazing Saddles ...."The Sheriff is a near" ....

Hear the song friend, hear the song....Here We Go Again.

This whole forum has been down this road enough. You are neither proving anything more here nor achieving anything with it This thread is fast moving away from Ramps to Bhajji. Get back to Ramps and leave Bhajji for BCCI and ICC.

Well with Gavakar on the ICC, who can trust them?

Batman wrote:

embee wrote:Anti Custer 6/9 ...nothing wrong with that wicket ...probably worth a sook

But that means you couldn't capitalize on that? A bad pitch sure. Undeniably. But with no umpiring issues and equal chances to both sides in the low scorer, surely a fair result? Then why blame the pitch? I think it was purely Punter's ego that got hurt. Gilchrist led Aus to the series win [with two wins earlier] and Punter couldn't make his only test as captain and player count. That was where I think the sook came from. He couldn't handle his failure.

Probably right about Punter's frustration....still a substandard pitch ...like the one's in Snoozyland that India loved so much

Batman wrote:

embee wrote:Why did it take so long to come out with the "your mother" line?

It's not racist ...it is highly abusive ...but would certainly be a defence to the charge

Had Symonds not informed him that he considered Monkey to be racial ...

Cue Blazing Saddles ...."The Sheriff is a near" ....

Hear the song friend, hear the song....Here We Go Again.

This whole forum has been down this road enough. You are neither proving anything more here nor achieving anything with it This thread is fast moving away from Ramps to Bhajji. Get back to Ramps and leave Bhajji for BCCI and ICC.

I've made my points on Ramps ...

embee wrote:Why did it take so long to come out with the "your mother" line?

Unless Kumble and Bhajji use that alibi at the final hearing, you are burning coals over nothing here.

taipan wrote:
Well with Gavakar on the ICC, who can trust them?

Who the hell is Gavakar? Did he play cricket?

Batman wrote:

taipan wrote:
Well with Gavakar on the ICC, who can trust them?

Who the hell is Gavakar? Did he play cricket?

Oh SUC in picking up typo shock

I always knew Cash was a stirrer.
Wonder how much he got paid for "lifting" the lid on a 10 year old can of worms?

10 pages, no one wins the bet.