Ramps: Australian team racially abused me

tac wrote:FFS, Rob the knob only posted this as a wind-up, best to leave Ramps to his "here's a chance to get my name back in the papers" sook . . . hardly worthy of debate, is it?

aye!

Agreer.

JGK wrote:

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:

Invader Zim wrote:No names, no details, no time, no places.

And Harbs wouldn't have called Symonds a monkey 'cos I like the guy'.

Thanks for your contribution Ramps.

I reckon it was Ponting, in the drawing room with the candlestick.


What do you want him to say? He obviously doesn't want to bring up old issues but he does want to point out that there is history.

But Zimmy's right - by not naming details he is inviting people to think the worst and therefore is unfairly tarnishing the whole team. Given the sook from Kumble abouut Hogg, perhaps someone called him a bastard.

Eh? So because Kumble reported Hogg for swearing, that means that Ramps, someone with English as his first language, has somehow confused swearing with racism?

SPC in No Comprehension Shock

Have no fear *Buckaroo* is here

Gwan' Tiger, as our friends in the Caribbean say.

Or don't gwan'.

embee wrote:SPC in No Comprehension Shock

Idiot. It's perfectly clear what he meant.

HH_pink wrote:Agreer.

Disagreer!

But, lets leave it at that. We have a Test to watch. And lose.

Noooo fight,fight,fight!

Furri - you dont rate India as having a chance of winning??

Furri - Here is one major reason why you should be confident of a competitive effort from your team - they are not england

I don't horrie. Forget batting, which may or may not work, look at out bowling.

Best chance was the last Test.

horace wrote:Furri - Here is one major reason why you should be confident of a competitive effort from your team - they are not england

Indeed !

furriner wrote:I don't horrie. Forget batting, which may or may not work, look at out bowling.

Best chance was the last Test.

Who would you have preferred as third seamer ?

"FFS, Rob the knob only posted this as a wind-up, best to leave Ramps to his "here's a chance to get my name back in the papers" sook . . . hardly worthy of debate, is it?"

Too much debate already, mainly of the mass variety.

Tacky, you alone might understand why I made sure the first contribution from Oz was the chicken soup recipe.....And I'll def use 'Rob the Nob' from here on.

*Buckaroo* wrote:

furriner wrote:I don't horrie. Forget batting, which may or may not work, look at out bowling.

Best chance was the last Test.

Who would you have preferred as third seamer ?

Of this lot? Or can we include Munaf/ Sree.

lol...i love chicken soup...made from home made stock....

Rob I wrote:Bet Zimmer will call me a "troll" too.

No quite, but we're getting there.

In both casaes furri ..

Give me a choice from present lot and if Sree/Mun were included ..

A Ramps thread and no Leo - has anybody checked that he's OK?

He's run down the shop for tissues . . .

*Buckaroo* wrote:In both casaes furri ..

Give me a choice from present lot and if Sree/Mun were included ..

1. Bowlers (Assuming Kumble plays Zaheer injured):
RP
Ishwant
Pathan

Edit: Which I see is what they've gone with.

My original point to horrie was that this line up isn't good enough to get the Aussies out twice, forget what our batting does.

2. Bowlers (Assuming Kumble plays/ Zaheer injured):

Sree
Munaf
RP

embee wrote:

HH_pink wrote:

So, because Kumble initially thought there was no point in making mountains out of molehills, he's a sook. Gotcha.

Yes ...

I would have no problem with the complaint being made if he had been initially offended by it ... but the delayed reaction was sooky

Wow....

Come on, I doubt even u believe what u posted there.

[quote="prasad14]


Come on, I doubt even u believe what u posted there.[/quote]

Type words out in full you lazy bast sod....

Fred Nerk wrote:[quote="prasad14]


Come on, I doubt even u believe what u posted there.

Type words out in full you lazy bast sod....[/quote]

Why?