Re: What was your username on the channel 4 cricket forum?

by taipan Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:20 pm

Merlin wrote:
taipan wrote:
Merlin wrote:
The One wrote:
taipan wrote:The funny part was that I was bitching.

sounds about right

So you reported it to the Mods ?

No I made a post about it as anyone with half a brain can see......
The question wasn't directed at you numbskull....
Jesus .. you can really be thick at times.

Nah just used to you jumping on the bandwagon.

by skully Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:21 pm

The Emporer of Zog is firmly of the belief that TO reported him any number of times. Seems a bit churlish really.

by taipan Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:22 pm

I think we all knew that TO was one of the main culprits.

by Merlin Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:23 pm

Ah ... the bandwagon riposte ... predictable AND thick .. and a snitch.

Carry on nark.

by The One Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:23 pm

Merlin wrote:
The One wrote:
The funny part was that I was bitching.

sounds about right

So you reported it to the Mods ?

meh, couldnt be bothered who is banned or who is not. people take this forum too seriously it seems. no one on here is really your friend, no one your enemy. just a place to discuss some cricket

by Merlin Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:23 pm

taipan wrote:I think we all knew that TO was one of the main culprits.

So you got there .........eventually! Rolling Eyes

by skully Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:24 pm

But TO, we aren't talking about this place, we are talking about the old place.

by taipan Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:25 pm

Merlin wrote:Ah ... the bandwagon riposte ... predictable AND thick

You think it's your private property the number of times you have used it?

by The One Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:25 pm

skully wrote:The Emporer of Zog is firmly of the belief that TO reported him any number of times. Seems a bit churlish really.

lol! another paranoid forumer. not too intelligent either it seems. seriously people, get a life

by taipan Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:26 pm

Merlin wrote:
taipan wrote:I think we all knew that TO was one of the main culprits.
So you got there .........eventually!

Struggling to understand the tenses?

by Fred Nerk Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:27 pm

C4 Forums <chat@channel4.com> wrote:

C4 Forums Membership Information

Dear Fred Nerk,

The site administrators have removed your access rights for the following reason: GIVING OUT PERSONAL CONTACT INFORMATION We’re sorry but, for your own safety, we do not allow users to give out any kind of personal contact information or anything that would enable another forum user to find out who you are/where you live. This includes msn IDs, email addresses, phone numbers, exact places of work etc. You may think you know the people you are chatting to on the forum, but you do not know the many thousands of casual guests who wander the forums and can read what you post. If you would like to dispute this suspension please email chat@channel4.com and include any information related to this issue. Your account will then be reviewed.

Re: C4 Forums Membership InformationFriday, 26 January, 2007 7:54 AM

From: "Fred Nerk"

To: "C4 Forums" <chat@channel4.com>

Congratulations. The Forum has become the ed's own Big Brother and I've been voted off his stagnant little island. O the shame, the humiliation!!! Mainly thanks to the childish ego-tripping favoritism of the eds, the forum is shot to hell in any case. I've been suspended on a technicality three times and as I understand it that's the end of the road, but nobody ever does sweet FA about terminal nuisances like Lord Lagaan under his many different guises, who contribute nothing at all to the forum, except provide amusement for the eds by being irritating. No great loss. Unless an adult starts running it soon, the whole site will disappear up its own backside within months anyway.

by skully Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:27 pm

You referring to me, TO? I am emotionlessly reporting something that was stated to me. shrug

As you know mate, I am more than happy to talk cricket with you, and have no bone to pick. So let's not go off all half-cocked, ay?

by The One Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:29 pm

skully wrote:But TO, we aren't talking about this place, we are talking about the old place.

you can talk about any place you want. my life does not become brighter by banning someone on an internet forum, nor does it become gloomier if some idiot goes ballistic and stays on

by skully Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:30 pm

And there was me telling Zat that TO ain't so bad. shrug

by doremi Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:31 pm

doremi, and then maybe IMDWalrus.

by The One Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:31 pm

skully wrote:You referring to me, TO? I am emotionlessly reporting something that was stated to me.

As you know mate, I am more than happy to talk cricket with you, and have no bone to pick. So let's not go off all half-cocked, ay?

well, youre not the one who thinks i got him banned, so obviously i wouldnt be referring to you as the paranoid forumer

i have no bones with anyone. i have had arguments with many on many matters, but a proper non-abusive debate is always welcome. play the ball, not the man

by Merlin Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:31 pm

taipan wrote:

Struggling to understand the tenses?

You wouldn't if you briefly stopped to read a post before doing your usual climbing in with both feet and making an arse of yourself after I had to explain it to you ... viz., TO.
Get a grip and return to your bandwagon.

by skully Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:32 pm

dori comes in at just the right time to get thinks back On Topic. Well played, sir.

by taipan Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:32 pm

Merlin wrote:
taipan wrote:

Struggling to understand the tenses?
You wouldn't if you briefly stopped to read a post before doing your usual climbing in with both feet and making an arse of yourself after I had to explain it to you ... viz., TO.
Get a grip and return to your bandwagon.

Whose bandwagon is this anyway?

by Big_Bad_Bob Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:33 pm

Fred Nerk wrote:C4 Forums <chat@channel4.com> wrote:

C4 Forums Membership Information

Dear Fred Nerk,

The site administrators have removed your access rights for the following reason: GIVING OUT PERSONAL CONTACT INFORMATION We’re sorry but, for your own safety, we do not allow users to give out any kind of personal contact information or anything that would enable another forum user to find out who you are/where you live. This includes msn IDs, email addresses, phone numbers, exact places of work etc. You may think you know the people you are chatting to on the forum, but you do not know the many thousands of casual guests who wander the forums and can read what you post. If you would like to dispute this suspension please email chat@channel4.com and include any information related to this issue. Your account will then be reviewed.

Re: C4 Forums Membership InformationFriday, 26 January, 2007 7:54 AM

From: "Fred Nerk"

To: "C4 Forums" <chat@channel4.com>

Congratulations. The Forum has become the ed's own Big Brother and I've been voted off his stagnant little island. O the shame, the humiliation!!! Mainly thanks to the childish ego-tripping favoritism of the eds, the forum is shot to hell in any case. I've been suspended on a technicality three times and as I understand it that's the end of the road, but nobody ever does sweet FA about terminal nuisances like Lord Lagaan under his many different guises, who contribute nothing at all to the forum, except provide amusement for the eds by being irritating. No great loss. Unless an adult starts running it soon, the whole site will disappear up its own backside within months anyway.

Sage.

by tac Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:33 pm

Merlin wrote:
taipan wrote:

Struggling to understand the tenses?
You wouldn't if you briefly stopped to read a post before doing your usual climbing in with both feet and making an arse of yourself after I had to explain it to you ... viz., TO.
Get a grip and return to your bandwagon.

merls in form tonight . . .

by skully Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:33 pm

The One wrote:
skully wrote:You referring to me, TO? I am emotionlessly reporting something that was stated to me.

As you know mate, I am more than happy to talk cricket with you, and have no bone to pick. So let's not go off all half-cocked, ay?

well, youre not the one who thinks i got him banned, so obviously i wouldnt be referring to you as the paranoid forumer

i have no bones with anyone. i have had arguments with many on many matters, but a proper non-abusive debate is always welcome. play the ball, not the man

No argument from me, my friend. Good cricket critique and comparision of opinion. Let's keep it going.

by Fred Nerk Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:36 pm

chat@channel4.com wrote: (in response to the above)

Dear Sir, Thanks for your email. Your account was suspended for the following posts:

25-01-07 18:49 Topic: ***Australian Open - official thread***

URGENT MESSAGE FOR ANDY! Ring ROGER 646062

05-01-07 11:35 Re: What Harmy needs is a GPS

What Honi the Haemorroid needs is a bucket of nuclear waste to stick his head in

02-01-07 11:31 THE IGNORE FUNCTION

Made for dealing with the Honiyans of this world. Everybody should make use of it.

Regards
C4 Communities

RE: C4 Forums Membership InformationMonday, 29 January, 2007 9:46 AM
From: "Fred Nerk"

To: chat@channel4.com

You really aren't all that clever in there are you? 'Andy' is Andy Roddick and 'Roger' is a bloke called Roger Federer. They are both well-known tennis players. Last week they played each other and that mock phone number is the scores. In tennis, you win a 'set' when you win six games.....oh never mind! And Honiyan: He's a bloody nuisance. You lot need to decide whether you are there to run the forum properly for the benefit of its users, or just to use it as a source of cheap amusement for yourselves. If you keep treating him as the Golden Child and giving him licence to annoy as he pleases, and banning anybody who gives him anything of his own back, you'll kill the forum. Because we're all getting well and truly sick and tired of the joke.

In replying to this email make the subject 'Golden Child'. At least then I'll know you've bothered to read the damned thing.

by tac Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:36 pm

I don't think this has been posted for a while . . . and here seems an appropriate place . . .

by Merlin Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:37 pm

tac wrote:
Merlin wrote:
taipan wrote:

Struggling to understand the tenses?
You wouldn't if you briefly stopped to read a post before doing your usual climbing in with both feet and making an arse of yourself after I had to explain it to you ... viz., TO.
Get a grip and return to your bandwagon.

merls in form tonight . . .

It's easy with a tosser at the other end, mate.

And I thought clearing up Winston's bogies was a hard job ...
comparing it to comprehending the Jaarpie's blatherings it's a stroll in the park!

by Sponsored content