Re: Australia v South Africa, 1st Test, Perth, Dec 17-21

by horace Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:00

our stoopidity in the first innings was almost entirely down to the dubbers and the bills...

by Zat Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:07

PeterCS wrote:Apart from the spelling early on? ...

I don't know what you're talking about. Razz

by skully Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:22

Mick Sawyer wrote:WTF is it with spivs and ball watching? Haddin decides to gawk at it tracking towards the boundary while Lee is 15 yards down the wicket?

FFS, are you still sooking abut the Galoot running himself out in Adelaide. Sad

by horace Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:24

it was FLEAS, the selfish redinker who has finally thrown off any semblance of being a wozzie (other then for G Wood) who was at fault

by skully Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:27

JGK wrote:Should Punter have a 3rd man in from ball 1?

Yes, but he'll be far too stoopid to do that. It'll be Ashes 05 all over again this summer, with the Yarps, particularly Sooky, OCD and Maria scoring heavily in that region.

by skully Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:27

horace wrote:it was FLEAS, the selfish redinker who has finally thrown off any semblance of being a wozzie (other then for G Wood) who was at fault

Yes Trev.

by horace Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:28

yes gabba

by horace Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:29

...erm...apologies S that was a bit rough

by skully Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:32

So the nurses put extra arsenic on the porridge this morning, h?

by horace Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:35

uurrhhkkkhh...I prefer arsenic to porridge...eat that stuff and you end up wearing a kilt, supporting the spivs and somehow understanding mudge

by skully Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:39

[cringes at the thought of h in a kilt] sook

by horace Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:40

fear not S ... I never eat porridge and am therefore immune to the perversity of the kilt, spivs, mudge and whatever goes with the above

by OP Tipping Thu 18 Dec 2008, 00:51

My predictions are always rubbish, but here you go:

Australia scrap to 360, Jaapies are 6/240 at stumps.

by PlanetPakistan Thu 18 Dec 2008, 01:07

JGK wrote:Should Punter have a 3rd man in from ball 1?

No, he should have an extra slip.

by Zat Thu 18 Dec 2008, 01:37

Maybe if he had an extra lisp we wouldn't have to hear him talk so much crap.

by OP Tipping Thu 18 Dec 2008, 02:07

In the olden days he would have extra pils.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pils

by PeterCS Thu 18 Dec 2008, 02:10

If he had an extra spil, it'd need mopping up.

by tac Thu 18 Dec 2008, 02:13

if he had extra lips he'd be even more of a qunt face . . .

by PeterCS Thu 18 Dec 2008, 02:23

ah. plis!

by doctorspin Thu 18 Dec 2008, 02:42

Oz 10 and Jack seemingly taking this vaunted SA bowling attack apart...FFS

by Henry Thu 18 Dec 2008, 02:44

Ian Chappell is such a bore. He just recycles the same theories over and over again every summer, but acts like he's saying them for the first time.

by PlanetPakistan Thu 18 Dec 2008, 02:45

I predict a draw

by PlanetPakistan Thu 18 Dec 2008, 02:50

Where has the yorker gone? hardly ever see yorkers in test cricket

by PlanetPakistan Thu 18 Dec 2008, 03:01

AUS move ahead of Sobers

367/9

by Zat Thu 18 Dec 2008, 03:05

PlanetPakistan wrote:Where has the yorker gone? hardly ever see yorkers in test cricket

It's nice to see that Australia's not the only country that has seemingly abandoned this philosophy to dislodge the 9,10,11. And it makes a nice change to see the Aussie last pair get some runs.

by Sponsored content