Not a no-ball?
+8
lardbucket
taipan
Rachel
PeterCS
embee
doctorspin
OP Tipping
LeFromage
12 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Not a no-ball?
PeterCS wrote:Just coming back to this ....
Surely the bowler has to tell the ump if he switches from quick to slow, or vice versa? (Sobers, Grieg, Symonds, three examples off the top of my head.)
Reason: It might easily affect e.g. how the batsman wishes to take guard. What you can kick away with impunity from a spinner, might trap you LB if it swings or seams? And thus, surely the batsman might want to address the ball differently (stance, guard).
I know I am lazy not checking the Laws. ...
No ..he doesn't PCS ...It's the No Ball Law if you want some directions ...Right or Left Arm ...Over or around the wicket ...are the only things a bowler must declare
embee- Number of posts : 26339
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Not a no-ball?
PeterCS wrote:Just coming back to this ....
Surely the bowler has to tell the ump if he switches from quick to slow, or vice versa? (Sobers, Grieg, Symonds, three examples off the top of my head.)
Reason: It might easily affect e.g. how the batsman wishes to take guard. What you can kick away with impunity from a spinner, might trap you LB if it swings or seams? And thus, surely the batsman might want to address the ball differently (stance, guard).
I know I am lazy not checking the Laws. ...
No way. Quick, slow, seam, swing, spin, shiny side to the right/left/outside/inside; no business of the umpire.
As has been said, over or round the wicket and right or left arm. That is all.
And it is the square leg umpire who can call a chuck so bowling behind the other umpire shouldn't matter in that respect.
And yes, the batsman should be ready when the bowler starts his run up. If something else distracts during the run up and he pulls away, dead ball. But if a bowler releases early, the batsman should be ready and will be assumed to be ready.
doctorspin- Number of posts : 2746
Reputation : 8
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Re: Not a no-ball?
Either umpire can no ball for a throw ...
embee- Number of posts : 26339
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background :
Re: Not a no-ball?
as hair once did methinks
horace- Number of posts : 42595
Age : 115
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background :
Re: Not a no-ball?
Yes, sorry I didn't properly correct my post. In fact it was remembering the Hair call that reminded me that either umpire may call. the point is, the fact that the square leg can call negates the view that the bowler must not release early and far behind as the standing umpire can't see the action.embee wrote:Either umpire can no ball for a throw ...
In any case, it is square leg who is in a far better position. Also he doesn't have to thinkl about and check for front foot no-balls, LBW etc.
doctorspin- Number of posts : 2746
Reputation : 8
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background :
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Bob Willis says the ball was changed in SL match for ball tampering.
» Seven ball over
» ball tampering
» Ball tampering - Not again !!
» The new old white ball
» Seven ball over
» ball tampering
» Ball tampering - Not again !!
» The new old white ball
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Today at 13:28 by lardbucket
» Alan Jones gets his England cap... and #700 approaches
Today at 08:10 by skully
» Celebrity Death List MMXXIV/The Death Thread 2024
Today at 08:02 by skully
» Australian Domestic Season 2024/25
Today at 04:13 by Nath
» Upcoming Test Cricket
Yesterday at 23:14 by skully
» Graeme Swann: Great All-Rounder
Yesterday at 20:53 by Norfolk Ian Goode
» Current International One Day Cricket
Yesterday at 10:42 by skully
» International Rugby Union Thread
Sun 17 Nov 2024, 22:37 by Norfolk Ian Goode
» Article on Pant's road to recovery from near fatal car crash
Sun 17 Nov 2024, 02:29 by Red