Flaming Bails
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Not a no-ball?

+8
lardbucket
taipan
Rachel
PeterCS
embee
doctorspin
OP Tipping
LeFromage
12 posters

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Go down

Not a no-ball? - Page 2 Empty Re: Not a no-ball?

Post by embee Thu 18 Dec 2008, 23:21

PeterCS wrote:Just coming back to this ....

Surely the bowler has to tell the ump if he switches from quick to slow, or vice versa? (Sobers, Grieg, Symonds, three examples off the top of my head.)

Reason: It might easily affect e.g. how the batsman wishes to take guard. What you can kick away with impunity from a spinner, might trap you LB if it swings or seams? And thus, surely the batsman might want to address the ball differently (stance, guard).

I know I am lazy not checking the Laws. ...

No ..he doesn't PCS ...It's the No Ball Law if you want some directions ...Right or Left Arm ...Over or around the wicket ...are the only things a bowler must declare
embee
embee


Number of posts : 26339
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : aus

Back to top Go down

Not a no-ball? - Page 2 Empty Re: Not a no-ball?

Post by doctorspin Fri 19 Dec 2008, 00:34

PeterCS wrote:Just coming back to this ....

Surely the bowler has to tell the ump if he switches from quick to slow, or vice versa? (Sobers, Grieg, Symonds, three examples off the top of my head.)

Reason: It might easily affect e.g. how the batsman wishes to take guard. What you can kick away with impunity from a spinner, might trap you LB if it swings or seams? And thus, surely the batsman might want to address the ball differently (stance, guard).

I know I am lazy not checking the Laws. ...

No way. Quick, slow, seam, swing, spin, shiny side to the right/left/outside/inside; no business of the umpire.

As has been said, over or round the wicket and right or left arm. That is all.

And it is the square leg umpire who can call a chuck so bowling behind the other umpire shouldn't matter in that respect.

And yes, the batsman should be ready when the bowler starts his run up. If something else distracts during the run up and he pulls away, dead ball. But if a bowler releases early, the batsman should be ready and will be assumed to be ready.
doctorspin
doctorspin

Not a no-ball? - Page 2 7EoDRAk

Number of posts : 2746
Reputation : 8
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Not a no-ball? - Page 2 Empty Re: Not a no-ball?

Post by embee Fri 19 Dec 2008, 00:50

Either umpire can no ball for a throw ...
embee
embee


Number of posts : 26339
Age : 57
Reputation : 263
Registration date : 2007-09-03
Flag/Background : aus

Back to top Go down

Not a no-ball? - Page 2 Empty Re: Not a no-ball?

Post by horace Fri 19 Dec 2008, 00:52

as hair once did methinks
horace
horace


Number of posts : 42595
Age : 115
Reputation : 90
Registration date : 2007-09-06
Flag/Background : ire

Back to top Go down

Not a no-ball? - Page 2 Empty Re: Not a no-ball?

Post by doctorspin Fri 19 Dec 2008, 01:51

embee wrote:Either umpire can no ball for a throw ...
Yes, sorry I didn't properly correct my post. In fact it was remembering the Hair call that reminded me that either umpire may call. the point is, the fact that the square leg can call negates the view that the bowler must not release early and far behind as the standing umpire can't see the action.

In any case, it is square leg who is in a far better position. Also he doesn't have to thinkl about and check for front foot no-balls, LBW etc.
doctorspin
doctorspin

Not a no-ball? - Page 2 7EoDRAk

Number of posts : 2746
Reputation : 8
Registration date : 2007-08-31
Flag/Background : eng

Back to top Go down

Not a no-ball? - Page 2 Empty Re: Not a no-ball?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum