Whats the story with the Reputation Buttons?

It is true batty was the only one 'not worrying' about the reps and thus got a sh!tload of them against his i.d.

Kinda like saying, 'just because you are 'not' paranoid, doesn't mean you have no enemies'.

hmmmmm . . . batty, bucky and taips in a battle of witless . . . . thank god for the ignore function . . . and razor blades . . .

taipan wrote:

Batman wrote:

taipan wrote:

Batman wrote:

taipan wrote:FFS it was basically only the 2 of you who were worried about it all.

Not me. Never. So it was just the one.

BS, you had a 10 page thread going on about it.

Dude, I merely asked a couple of questions and certainly didn't stretch it to so many pages all by myself. Don't blame me if half the forum kept themselves busy on it and kept it buzzing.....

Crap, I think something like 18 of the first 20 posts were from you.

So 18 posts out of 18 Pages makes me completely responsible? And how many of thsoe 18 were not in form of questions and in form of any 'grievances?'

tac wrote:hmmmmm . . . batty, bucky and taips in a battle of witless . . . . thank god for the ignore function . . . and razor blades . . .

You just miss not being a part of it.........

Anyways, this thread has outlived it's purpose. So outta here...

Batman wrote:

taipan wrote:

Batman wrote:

taipan wrote:

Batman wrote:

taipan wrote:FFS it was basically only the 2 of you who were worried about it all.

Not me. Never. So it was just the one.

BS, you had a 10 page thread going on about it.

Dude, I merely asked a couple of questions and certainly didn't stretch it to so many pages all by myself. Don't blame me if half the forum kept themselves busy on it and kept it buzzing.....

Crap, I think something like 18 of the first 20 posts were from you.

So 18 posts out of 18 Pages makes me completely responsible? And how many of thsoe 18 were not in form of questions and in form of any 'grievances?'

Twisting what I said. Shows how worked up you were over the whole issue.

Didn't Vicky say he wasn't going to post in this thread any more . . . ?

taips, enough of the quoting, thanks.

Zat wrote:

Demelza wrote:

Zat wrote:

Demelza wrote:Ah, you lot are cruel. Batman has a reputation now of -51. It's his birthday next week so I think you should all be kind and show some compassion for our 'special' class mate.

So you'll treat Batty with the same kindness you showed Bucky? That really was a pathetic display.

Sorry Zat, I don't know what you're on about but Bucky has always been nice to me. I'm not concerned about anyone's political or religious views on here. TBH, I don't usually read them.

So, by extension, you've never seemingly read any of bucky's posts.

And what if I do? What if I don't? The fact remains that he's always been nice to me.

Which means you should be asking yourself exactly what he wants from you.

I think Dem is a dragon like myself and can't tolerate injustice.

and that's that.

us dragos are special in that sense. Yes.

freddled gruntbuggly wrote:Which means you should be asking yourself exactly what he wants from you.

ahh that wonderful ABC logic shows up again ..

McGrath plays for the foundation and Warney plays for the love of the game . . the that stinky subi, gosh; darn surely he has some vested interest and dark plot rolled up his sleeve somewhere.

his motives must surely be always suspect.

subi, schmubi. You're a bloke, that means you have an ulterior motive. End of.

yeah ..

Men are to be distrusted on all counts. Leave the world to women and they shall f**k it up for all.

Gee, you're almost misogynistic enough to be an Aussie.

It was a comment on general western trend to distrust men, not specifically directed at any gender.

*Buckaroo* wrote:It was a comment on general western trend to distrust men, not specifically directed at any gender.

Gold

taipan wrote:

Gold

was explaining the latter part of my statement. Wat the hell ?

freddled gruntbuggly wrote:Didn't Vicky say he wasn't going to post in this thread any more . . . ?

That was until the Rep buttons did a vanishing act. This is now a general thread with no specific issue anymore. I didn't say I won't post here again. I said I wouldn't 'reply' to people here regarding some queries. But the need for that ahs also gone now.

taipan wrote:

Batman wrote:

taipan wrote:

Batman wrote:

taipan wrote:

Batman wrote:

taipan wrote:FFS it was basically only the 2 of you who were worried about it all.

Not me. Never. So it was just the one.

BS, you had a 10 page thread going on about it.

Dude, I merely asked a couple of questions and certainly didn't stretch it to so many pages all by myself. Don't blame me if half the forum kept themselves busy on it and kept it buzzing.....

Crap, I think something like 18 of the first 20 posts were from you.

So 18 posts out of 18 Pages makes me completely responsible? And how many of thsoe 18 were not in form of questions and in form of any 'grievances?'

Twisting what I said. Shows how worked up you were over the whole issue.

Different grapes to different people. If it looked like getting 'worked up' to you, than fine. No two people think the same way about anything anyways...

freddled gruntbuggly wrote:Gee, you're almost misogynistic enough to be an Aussie.

Take that compliment for what it's worth Bucks. You won't get it again.....

Batman wrote:Different grapes to different people. If it looked like getting 'worked up' to you, than fine. No two people think the same way about anything anyways...

Well I have a pretty good idea that a number of forummers agreed with my view.

taipan wrote:

Batman wrote:Different grapes to different people. If it looked like getting 'worked up' to you, than fine. No two people think the same way about anything anyways...

Well I have a pretty good idea that a number of forummers agreed with my view.

You guys just got together to try and get a game together. I didn't even realize that simple questions asked about something could even be a bait game. Hey I am a simple guy living a simple life. So sue me.

You all should be ashamed of yourselves.....

How coame a Subi can never admit to being at fault. Batty, Bucky and Reddy, all the same.

taipan wrote:How coame a Subi can never admit to being at fault. Batty, Bucky and Reddy, all the same.

Subis have always minded their own affairs and not stuck their parts into other people's affairs. By subi I mean Indic in thought, because I cannot assume this for the ideologies of the ragtag bunch on our periphery.

Since we hold ourselves to higher 'dharmic' standards, we believe that we do not have to commit sin and then repent and admit faults.