Four Pakistanis arrested for racially abusing South Africans

Article

mynah wrote:Article

Phurt, they probably looked like golly-wogs and deserved the abuse.

When it rains....

Another day, another racist story somewhere in the world

BS

There is no racism in the sub continent.

taipan wrote:BS

There is no racism in the sub continent.

Get onto Pakpassion quick, taips!

can't blow my cover like that

Yep, my bad.

doremi wrote:

Tired?

The Pakistanis are to be lauded. It clearly separates them from the Boers in SA.

mirchy wrote:The Pakistanis are to be lauded. It clearly separates them from the Boers in SA.

Mirchy in a worthy of PP post.

mirchy wrote:The Pakistanis are to be lauded. It clearly separates them from the Boers in SA.

I don't know what the attitude of the Boers was when they were still alive, but you may be right - perhaps they were too busy fighting in the Anglo-Boer War to abuse black South Africans.

mynah wrote:

mirchy wrote:The Pakistanis are to be lauded. It clearly separates them from the Boers in SA.

I don't know what the attitude of the Boers was when they were still alive, but you may be right - perhaps they were too busy fighting in the Anglo-Boer War to abuse black South Africans.

Here is an extract that I was alluding to:
“……Two very different nationalist movements emerge following the formation of the Union. The white Afrikaner nationalist movement has its roots in Boer chauvinism and is represented by the National Party, formed in January 1914. The black nationalist movement is led primarily by the African National Congress (ANC), formed in 1912 as the South African Native National Congress and renamed in 1923.
The Afrikaner nationalist movement grows in popularity over the next 30 years, playing on Afrikaner resentment of the British business class that controls most of South Africa's economy and fear of the black majority. In 1934 South Africa becomes a sovereign state within the British Empire. In 1948 the National Party wins the all-white general election. The party has campaigned on a promise to introduce a system of "apartheid" to totally separate the races. Discrimination against blacks, "coloureds" and Asians will be codified and extended.
Opposition to the apartheid system by the black majority is ruthlessly suppressed. The apartheid system receives increasing support from the white electorate. The National Party will remain in power until 1994. …..”

Just a historic fact. No offense meant.

mirchy wrote:

mynah wrote:

mirchy wrote:The Pakistanis are to be lauded. It clearly separates them from the Boers in SA.

I don't know what the attitude of the Boers was when they were still alive, but you may be right - perhaps they were too busy fighting in the Anglo-Boer War to abuse black South Africans.

Here is an extract that I was alluding to:
“……Two very different nationalist movements emerge following the formation of the Union. The white Afrikaner nationalist movement has its roots in Boer chauvinism and is represented by the National Party, formed in January 1914. The black nationalist movement is led primarily by the African National Congress (ANC), formed in 1912 as the South African Native National Congress and renamed in 1923.
The Afrikaner nationalist movement grows in popularity over the next 30 years, playing on Afrikaner resentment of the British business class that controls most of South Africa's economy and fear of the black majority. In 1934 South Africa becomes a sovereign state within the British Empire. In 1948 the National Party wins the all-white general election. The party has campaigned on a promise to introduce a system of "apartheid" to totally separate the races. Discrimination against blacks, "coloureds" and Asians will be codified and extended.
Opposition to the apartheid system by the black majority is ruthlessly suppressed. The apartheid system receives increasing support from the white electorate. The National Party will remain in power until 1994. …..”

Just a historic fact. No offense meant.

No, that's just an article you spent an hour googling to cover your juvenile comment above. You're a farkin racist piece of shit. Offence meant!

Boer means farmer.

mirchy wrote:The Pakistanis are to be lauded. It clearly separates them from the Boers in SA.

No offence meant?

taipan wrote:

mirchy wrote:The Pakistanis are to be lauded. It clearly separates them from the Boers in SA.

Mirchy in a worthy of PP post.

Maybe causticity is a part of your personality, but you should study your own country’s history before displaying your ignorance.

mirchy wrote:

taipan wrote:

mirchy wrote:The Pakistanis are to be lauded. It clearly separates them from the Boers in SA.

Mirchy in a worthy of PP post.

Maybe causticity is a part of your personality, but you should study your own country’s history before displaying your ignorance.

WTF has the history of my country to do with your racist rants?

taipan wrote:Boer means farmer.

As you well know, I speak Dutch

mirchy wrote:

taipan wrote:Boer means farmer.

As you well know, I speak Dutch

Double Dutch mostly

"WTF has the history of my country to do with your racist rants?"

hehehehe. I gave you a reference. Anyway, you are more stupid than I thought. At least tac doesn't disguise it.

Mirchy.

Living proof that racism(caste) is alive and well in India.

mirchy wrote:"WTF has the history of my country to do with your racist rants?"

hehehehe. I gave you a reference. Anyway, you are more stupid than I thought. At least tac doesn't disguise it.

mirchy, the black man's great avenger, taking it to the white man tonight. Give it all you got, champ. Knock yourself out!

Well Mirchy, how is it qualification for that 'counter' racism. I mean, it was a pathetic throwaway comment. It's not even as if Pakistan had anything to do with apartheid, bar some who emigrated there. I'd have more credence thrashing a Dane or two for invading my country 1,000 years ago. Which is f**king stupid in itself.